What are they gonna do? UNcopy the data?
this post was submitted on 06 Feb 2025
94 points (94.3% liked)
politics
19784 readers
3515 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Aren't these the same guys who want to communicate exclusively thorough non FOIA means and also have full unfettered access to the entire system? Security audits tend to lose their punch when there's no proof of anything and the logs have been purged as part of the stuff that's not "read only"
I suspect that the damage (for the most part) has already been done.
more than likely. the backdoors installed, all the data copied.
Yup..one the back doors are installed they can fire musk for publicity. It doesn't matter
Even if they don't do things to disrupt, they could use all the data they pirated in the same bullshit way they did the "Twitter Files" (and fuck Matt Taibbi for that - leftist, my ass) to a credulous bunch of right-wing dumbasses again as an excuse for why they carried out their hacking activities/biggest data breach on America and Americans.
World's most powerful military, biggest most far reaching and all intrusive global security organization, all seeing, all knowing, all capable ... and all it took to undo it all was an unelected billionaire and six unqualified, unsecured, inexperienced young men with computers.
the truth at the center of every political ideology is that every human organization is a coagulation of trust. the politics we engage in are simply about getting the most power to the most trust worthy people. personally i'm of the view that this means power should be distributed to the populace, make of that what you will. but this has always been possible. the only thing preventing it was keeping untrustworthy people away from power. we failed this election to do that. it is what it is. now we have to start coalition building all over from the start, so we will.
so bear the following in mind: any decision that affects more than two people is political. relationships are political. everything you do and say is propaganda. so build strong relationships. support people because strong people support people. reduce the harm that this system does to the people you support because hurt people hurt people. building a better future starts at home.
America is dying with a whimper
Headline is, for all practical purposes, false. Let me explain.
"The Defendants will not provide access to any payment record or payment system of records maintained by or within the Bureau of the Fiscal Service," the [Trump Administration] proposed order says.
My first thought was "They're lying." But then:
The order would allow exceptions for two special government employees at the Treasury — Tom Krause and Marko Elez — saying they are permitted access "as needed" to perform their duties, "provided that such access to payment records will be 'read only.'"
So ... they actually will still have access. The Independent reports:
Elez has reportedly been given administrator-level privileges that theoretically allow someone to change user permissions, delete and modify critical files that contain highly sensitive and confidential information.
Full and unfettered access, because read only my ass.
The proposed order also carves out exceptions for:
- Any person who is an employee (but not a Special Government Employee) of the Department of the Treasury and who has a need for the record or system of records in the performance of their duties;
Okay, sure, actual Treasury employees need access to data. Still, I wonder if they've also changed the "performance of their duties" part such that they're basically delivering whatever the disallowed people would have.
- Any person who is entitled to access the relevant record or system of records under the Internal Revenue Code.
I wonder who they have at IRS.
Yea, two days after they downloaded everything and made the changes they wanted to.
I also like to tell people I have read only access to their files. Makes them feel more comfortable.
But to be fair it's literally a part of my job and i say it so my tech illiterate coworkers don't have a panic attack when i need to remote into their computer. I'm not trying to destroy the company I work for like these guys, I'm just saying it's bullshit.
They shouldn't have let him in to begin with.
Agreed he has our personal info that's horrifying.
He already had that. This is the Treasury system, which controls basically all of the funding for the country. It's way worse than privacy concerns.
“The fox has been guarding the hen house all week but don’t worry, we’ve asked him to stop now.”
They already got what they came for, not that we should Trust this administration to police itselfeven for a second lol
I bet anything that nothing at all happens to fElon even though what he has done and is doing is off-the-chart illegal and traitorous.
The guy should be up against the wall.
It doesn't matter. They've already had unfettered access, so there's no way it can ever be considered secure again.