this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2023
137 points (96.6% liked)

politics

19102 readers
3301 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

An escalating campaign, led by Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) and other Republicans, has cast a pall over programs that study political disinformation and the quality of medical information online

top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ATQ@lemm.ee 45 points 1 year ago (1 children)

GOP: We absolutely can not let people study lying liars.

Normal people: Why’s that?

GOP: …

[–] meco03211@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Jimcarey.jpeg "BECAUSE IT'S DEVASTATING TO MY CASE!"

[–] theodewere@kbin.social 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

so Jim is in the pocket of the Fentanyl people.. they must be the ones hooking him up with the ghoulish pall oozing from that skinbag draped over his skeleton..

[–] geosoco@kbin.social 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This was the intent of the inquiries.

However, I think the title is a bit misleading. I wouldn't say the research is "buckling". It's definitely been a headache, and sure there are some people who would rather not deal with the ever-increasing death threats, but that applies to many areas of research.

The question is how they're going to try and stop funding research into this. The research around this is especially important from a national security perspective, because it's become easier than ever to slide propaganda into social media and news media. If you've got enough resources, you can likely sway elections even easier than before.

[–] mibo80@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah, you can kind of play chess with a lot of GOP stratagems and it gets increasingly hard to see what moves are left for them. Keep the base stupid enough to win votes - sure, but they're at the point of fanaticism over Trump that without him there is no GOP. No one is going to listen to the Jim Jordans or Matt Gaetz types because they are no one in this new world. So why continue keeping them dumb? They have to see how once you get all the monkeys riled up what will happen. They aren't ruling the new America so why continue this bet? Death threats for not going along with the MAGA message? why do people with comfortable lives want to watch the world burn?