this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2025
312 points (99.4% liked)

politics

19656 readers
3626 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Officials in California have revealed that President Donald Trump nearly flooded the region’s farms when his administration tried to send an excessive amount of water south, a feat he bragged about on Friday.

“Today, 1.6 billion gallons and, in 3 days, it will be 5.2 billion gallons. Everybody should be happy about this long fought Victory!” Trump gloated in a Truth Social post.

Experts told The New York Times that the water released by the Army Corps on Friday has no way of reaching the region affected by the wildfires, which is over 200 miles away, and could have been useful to farmers months from now as irrigation.

all 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 4 points 1 hour ago

People just don’t get what’s happening here. He’s fucking America’s food supply to please Putin.

[–] CouncilOfFriends@slrpnk.net 12 points 7 hours ago

DonOld just wanted to make someone wet for the first time in his life.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 19 points 9 hours ago

I was expecting a fascist coup, even the camps aren’t that surprising, but I honestly wasn’t expecting the “weaponing civilian infrastructure” part of the war to start in less than 2 weeks.

[–] anindefinitearticle@sh.itjust.works 11 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Tulare county?

Good.

That should be a lake, not cotton fields.

Used to be one of the biggest lakes in the US.

In the 1862 flood it was bigger than lake ontario.

Then the cotton farmer arrived post civil war.

Flood 'em and rebuild the natural ecology.

Best thing he could have done for long-term stability of the region.

Gotta give props when he does the right thing.

Refill the swamp!

[–] anindefinitearticle@sh.itjust.works 9 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

Only Trump can get away with ruining the land of the cotton barons (wealthy elite) to restore the natural ecosystem. I may not agree with how it's being done, but this one had the right spirit. I hope he keeps it up and gives the great central swamp of California some time to recover. That would help wildfire resilience, and probably improve groundwater stores for the future. No human alive knows this ecosystem, they've just been living in its grave. As the husk dries, it's prone to burning. Let's regrow the wetlands.

[–] anindefinitearticle@sh.itjust.works 5 points 10 hours ago (3 children)

With the loss of our major cotton fields and high tariffs on imports, clothing will be hard to come by.

Q-tips. Medical gauze.

We need a better relationship with clothing.

Death to fashion. Let's build something new.d

[–] meyotch@slrpnk.net 4 points 5 hours ago

No it wont create clothing shortages. There’s enough fast fashion crap already made to keep us modest and warm for decades. I will be rocking that Ocean Pacific t-shirt from high school for another decade at least.

The medical concerns are somewhat based but cotton comes from many regions.

But if I smell what the rock is cooking, a nude protest would make for a fun news cycle.

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago

You guys have to stop wearing Q-tips, it's not sustainable!

[–] anindefinitearticle@sh.itjust.works 2 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

The deep south is poised to make a lot of money if they play their cards right. The US economy hemmed in by tariffs is powered by the south making cotton. They are the region best poised to make up the loss of supply that lake corcoran will replace.

It's time to return to our roots. It's what Trump promised and is delivering.

But please, no more (land)lords, no more masters, no more (wage)slaves.

The people that grow the crop need to get the profit.

If we can pull that off, that's a form of reparations. They get the land and the profit from the revived colonial machine to get us through a few hard years when the country really needs a cotton supply, and then when the country opens back up they get to do whatever they want with it. Infuse the region with cotton money and build a strong backbone of southern culture. Build the future MLK dreamed of. It's what you promised at inauguration. I dare you.

A chance to return to our roots and do it right. Give people land and get them growing cotton. The American way, just this time without the slavery. A chance to fix one of our mistakes.

Somehow we need to show solidarity for these workers. This could go badly for them, and they are probably the most vulnerable group of American citizens right now.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 2 points 2 hours ago

I doubt a crop rotation plan is in place.

[–] xenomor@lemmy.world 106 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (2 children)

This is terrorism and people need to start treating it that way. The State of California should seriously start considering seizure of federal lands and facilities within our territory.

The state should also start negotiating treaties directly Canada, Mexico and China that circumvent the petty and counterproductive economic warfare enacted by the administration.

[–] ShadowRam@fedia.io 30 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

states rights? right?

That's what Repub's want more than anything

[–] Arbiter@lemmy.world 7 points 10 hours ago

Only the states right to be racist.

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 12 points 16 hours ago (1 children)
[–] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 hours ago

And the get to hurt women, children, and then rest of the people they hate.

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 16 hours ago

They care about state's rights as much as they care about legal immigration.

[–] spencerwi@lemm.ee 11 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

Yeah! Let's start with Fort Sumner!

...wait

[–] Gerudo@lemm.ee 21 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

Isn't this just going to eventually just run into the ocean? Like, if they can't use it, it's just wasted as washing downstream.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 34 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

It's not going towards the fires

It was kept in the reservoir to water farmland during the summer drought

It will just flow down to the ocean

Trump is an idiot

[–] auraithx@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 17 hours ago

Yes, we are in the dumbest timeline. He flooded the farms and got rid of their water for the summer for a photo op and maga are still gargling his balls

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 28 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

Man, the media continues to fail to address Trump.

  • NYT: "Trump Officials Release Water in California That Experts Say Will Serve Little Use"
  • WP: "Trump opened the ‘valve’ on California water. It will probably be wasted."
  • LAT: "Acting on Trump’s order, federal officials opened up two California dams"
  • Newseek: "Trump Administration Releases California Dam Water Without State Approval"

LA Times and Newseek both completely omit that it won't help the wildfires from their title. Maybe the State didn't get asked, but that's just Trump bypassing those dithering California Dems. WP and NYT both hedge that it probably won't help or will have little use, but the truth is it won't have any use for the fires and should be reported as such. It's not experts being biased or cautious or the problem being hard so it's not a simple solution, it's useless.

The only mainstream publication on the first page of my search that kinda got it was Politico, but even they didn't mention that it was useless for the fires.

  • Politico: "Trump says he opened California’s water. Local officials say he nearly flooded them."
[–] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 84 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

Flood the fields now, then they won't have enough water in the summer dry season to irrigate the fields with. Good thinking, moron.

[–] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 55 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

How cute, you think he's thinking that far ahead.

6 months from now, when crops fail because of this bullshit, he'll blame it on the Green New Deal.

Then he'll probably try to irrigate the fields with water straight from the Pacific Ocean. "Free unlimited water, right at our doorstep? So what if our food tastes a little more salty? Free Water = less costs = cheaper food #MAGA"

[–] grue@lemmy.world 33 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

How cute, you think he isn't doing it on purpose.

Seriously though, stop pretending Trump is incompetent. Because it carries with it an implicit assumption of good intent, characterizing what he does as a mistake paradoxically gives him too much credit.

Even if he is incompetent, there are enough competent people around him to negate it as any sort of excuse. Trump absolutely knows that this is fucking over California -- "woke" urban people and Big Ag alike -- and he insisted upon it anyway because he is malicious and intending to destroy.

[–] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 12 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

He can be both malicious and incompetent. The two don't have to be mutually exclusive. A competent man with malicious intent in Trump's position would be able to do a lot more damage.

[–] Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world 14 points 21 hours ago

Then when the plants all die because they can’t absorb water he’ll blame fire prevention, which of course is DEI. 175 million people will agree with him and the rest shrug.

[–] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 10 points 20 hours ago

In his office a few days ago: "Fire bad. Water puts fire out. More water means more better."

"But Mr President, what about the flo-"

"YOU'RE FIRED. I SAID MORE WATER!"

[–] hperrin@lemmy.ca 51 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Fun fact: all those farmers probably voted for Trump, and now they get to experience the devastation he promised them.

[–] ShadowRam@fedia.io 17 points 20 hours ago (6 children)

Did they thou?

So many farmers got absolutely FUCKED first time around with the Tariff stuff, you would have thought they learned that lesson.

[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today 5 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

And they voted for him again. And still think he is doing the right thing.

Like, this will probably pivot to be "anti woke " flooding.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 2 points 2 hours ago

I watched a man that owns a trucking company rip apart, bit by bit, some y'all quaeda YouTuber claiming that tariffs weren't going to cause prices to go up and fuel prices would come down. That trucking company owner has no degree but plenty of sense. Would there were more like him.

[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 17 hours ago

https://www.politico.com/2024-election/results/california/

The red parts are mostly farming areas. There are some exceptions, like Napa and Sonoma, but they’re wine counties and tend to attract a different crowd.

[–] hperrin@lemmy.ca 20 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

They always blame it on the Democrats.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 9 points 17 hours ago

They learned the lesson to the same degree that America as a whole did.

[–] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 6 points 19 hours ago

But the mega agro corps live to see the little guys suffer.

[–] auraithx@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 17 hours ago

They did not, and they won’t this time either.

[–] hperrin@lemmy.ca 15 points 20 hours ago

There are fires in Florida? Better flood Virginia.

California is bigger than most people realize.

[–] ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.org 13 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

What a clot... His Project 2025 and billionaire handlers really need to tell him to stop playing with thing he doesn't understand and to confine him to his room.

[–] OneWomanCreamTeam@sh.itjust.works 17 points 19 hours ago

He isn't making an incompetent mistake. He's making a deliberate choice to fuck over California, and by extension the US.

[–] blakenong@lemmings.world 3 points 19 hours ago

You get what you pay for.