this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2025
38 points (95.2% liked)

Selfhosted

41635 readers
662 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
ruud@lemmy.world
Loki@lemmy.world
CannaVet@lemmy.world
devve@lemmy.world
HybridSarcasm@lemmy.world
HybridSarcasm@lemmy.hybridsarcasm.xyz
38
Looking for a Bookmark Manager (sopuli.xyz)
submitted 23 hours ago by theorangeninja@sopuli.xyz to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world
11 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I'm looking for a bookmark manager with offline capabilities. I want to host it at home and don't want to expose any ports so I should cache the links when it can't reach the server and also keep newly added links in cache and upload them when the server is reachable again (i.e., I am at home).

Is anyone aware if Linkwarden, Hoarder, Linkding (or something else) has this feature?

all 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] savx@lemmy.world 11 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

linkwarden can grab webpage for offline access. but i prefer archivebox, archivebox let you choose which method will be use, linkwarden will use every method in configuration. it's generally fine but i want some flexibility. archivebox also have more method to cache webpages. the downside of archivebox is its kinda unpolished, also they dont have a webui for mobile device.

and some webpages are too complicated for those apps, like require login or something, singlefile is a good solution, it directly download the webpage with your browser.

https://github.com/gildas-lormeau/SingleFile

[–] klangcola@reddthat.com 2 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

+1 for SingleFile

I recently tried LinkWarden, Linkding and Archivebox for making offline copies. They all had the same issue of running in to a Captcha or login wall for the sites I wanted to capture.
SingleFile to the rescue, as it uses your current browser session as a logged in and verified human.

Linkeding allows you to upload the singlefile html file attached to it link, but I didn't see such an option for Linkwarden.

[–] retro@infosec.pub 3 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

Hoarder has just released support for SingleFile also. You can set Hoarder as a save location in the SingleFile extension.

[–] peaceb@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

This is huge for me. My main hesitation with Hoarder. Thanks!

[–] klangcola@reddthat.com 1 points 8 hours ago

Game changing! I've never heard of Hoarder before, but will look in to it now.

LinkDing also has a REST API but I don't see the option to send attachment files

[–] theorangeninja@sopuli.xyz 1 points 19 hours ago

Thank you, this is not exactly what I am looking for but in the future I will look into this topic. It is a bit advanced and I need more hard drive space.

[–] Dungrad@feddit.org -4 points 11 hours ago

Yeah, good ones are hard to find nowadays. Did you try LinkedIn?

[–] ocean@lemmy.selfhostcat.com 3 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

I think there is a way to sync bookmarks to linkding. But you can also use floccus.

[–] theorangeninja@sopuli.xyz 1 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

Can floccus keep new links in cache if the server is not available? I think I tried floccus once but didn't manage to get this to work.

[–] rutrum@lm.paradisus.day 4 points 22 hours ago

Floccus just syncs, so whatever hasnt been synced would just wait in your bookmarks until the server was available.

[–] prostetnic_jeltz@lemmy.world 3 points 22 hours ago

Floccus saves a local copy. Sync is triggered by a timer or manually. If the connection fails, it shows a different/failed-sync icon. It will catch up with the next sync trigger.

My experience with floccus is in combination with Linkwarden.