this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2025
860 points (99.4% liked)

News

24300 readers
5793 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MehBlah@lemmy.world 19 points 8 hours ago (4 children)

Grow a spine and make it 100 percent. The quicker trumps masters learn it wont work the better.

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 13 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Tariffs hurt the country imposing them the most

[–] Croquette@sh.itjust.works 7 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Go tell that to the idiots who think that the tariffs are paid by the companies exporting the goods.

[–] OrteilGenou@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

Nah, keep shtum on that one until people in the US start to flip out

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Mescalito@lemmy.world 4 points 5 hours ago
[–] blady_blah@lemmy.world 29 points 9 hours ago (9 children)

So from the conservative viewpoint, what is the rationale for the tariffs? Are people really supposed to believe it has something to do with fentanyl? Like do conservatives actually believe that or is there some other narrative besides Donald Trump is looking to flex his power?

[–] kava@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

or is there some other narrative

I believe a couple different things

a) he's intentionally weakening the US economy to both weaken establishment institutions and spread mass discontent. he wants people nice and angry and fearful for the future. so when he takes more extreme actions later on, it doesn't seem as bad. also he's probably preparing for some sort of riot movement that includes political violence in the next couple years. as the establishment gets weaker, he'll be in a better position to essentially ignore them. so for example Supreme Court says something unconstitutional? Maybe he just ignores it and enforces his will regardless

b) in the near future we may see a serious decoupling of the US economy from the world. maybe it's due a planned war or some other circumstance and this is in preparation for that. tariffs tend to cut off the economy from the outside world. it'll hurt less later on if we do some of it now

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 6 points 6 hours ago

It's not conservatism, it's fascism. The strongman says jump and those loyal to him say "how high?" even when he's being stupid. There is no analysis of Trump's actions or why people go along with it beyond that.

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 16 points 8 hours ago

For the most part it's not getting the kind of attention you might expect, they are seeing this as all "part of the plan" and celebrating their great trade-warrior leader punishing the "bad guys" and the white house has deliberately withheld a LOT of the information about what's going on. Most of the breaking stories we've gotten have been from foreign press. We didn't even hear the tariff schedule until fucking France media issued stories.

There is not going to be the satisfaction we all hope for, not until there's literally a new dust-bowl as we get ravaged by a new great depression, which as bad as it could be, might be our only hope for a more balanced political system going forward. I hate that these clowns have made me into an accelerationist but here are.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

He's talking about Canada being 51st state. So not sure if he wants to just annex Canada.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Pika@sh.itjust.works 22 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

honestly countries affected should just go the nuclear route and embargo the US. in retaliation. Canada especially.

Yes it will fuck both sides, but it'll get the point across these tariffs are stupid

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 20 points 8 hours ago

The very best thing that can happen for our future is for these tariffs to have disastrous consequences. It will suck for all of us and people will suffer needlessly, but we're here because people have lost all sense of consequence and think this is all semi-fake WWE roleplay and that their "side" is somehow destined to win some great ideological battle.

If we crash and burn as a nation and hit a new great depression, I like to think that people may generally put more thought into who they elect to represent their needs.

Either way we're cooked, so I would like to see some good come from this.

Stockpile about a month's worth of food and fresh water and get a gun.

[–] jaxxed@lemmy.ml 26 points 11 hours ago (3 children)

Does this break/invalidate the existing free trade agreements between the countries? Does this mean that NAFTA and TRUMPFTA are now void?

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 8 hours ago

No, silly, this means America is Great Again. /s

[–] festus@lemmy.ca 10 points 10 hours ago

I don't think it's void exactly - there's some stuff around visas that's still active. But yeah, as far as being a trade agreement it's pretty worthless.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kaput@lemmy.world 15 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Personnaly I would put a mirror tarrif. Tax the stuff going out to USA. Canadian economy will slow down, don't make life more expensive for Canadians. And that way Americans might notice it faster if they pay 50 percent more.

[–] PhAzE@lemmy.ca 8 points 9 hours ago

The problem here, specifically, is that once imported items go up in price, there needs to be regulations that blocks local manufacturers from just upping their prices to match. Otherwise the imported items are still a viable purchase and tariffs will not work as a counter measure.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›