this post was submitted on 01 Feb 2025
83 points (94.6% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

55872 readers
642 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

TL;DR: Chinese LLMs (including DeepSeek) are trained on my illegal archive of books and papers — the largest in the world. The West needs to overhaul copyright law as a matter of national security.

all 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Onihikage@beehaw.org 2 points 8 hours ago

Intellectual property as a concept ultimately stifles progress every time it's been tried. Information wants to be free, and we prosper far more when we accept that reality.

Everyone should read Against Intellectual Monopoly by Michele Boldrin and David K. Levine. It's on David's website, Internet Archive, Anna's Archive, and various bookstores. Feel free to buy or print some copies and distribute them to your favorite people, libraries, bookstores, and congress critters~

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 25 points 1 day ago

Amazing how this was not an issue when Sam altman did it...

🤡

[–] ocean@lemmy.selfhostcat.com 29 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I deleted my comment because I missed that your summary is their summary lol.

I feel their summary is not the same point as their article. They’re arguing that freedom of information is important for technological advancement. Summary feels like they’re suddenly pro copyright.

Thanks for sharing. Freedom of information is important. Period.

[–] ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I assume they’re being pragmatic. Appealing the us to remove copyright is a fools errand. Appealing to shorten the length of the prection period is too frankly given the nature of corporate protectionism but it’s far more likely than America ever entertaining the idea of free information, regardless of the benefits that could ensue. Think of the shareholders! And yourself! Gotta hang that carrot in front of you. What if you finally write that novel and it blows up! I know you secretly want to be a multimillionaire! No one just makes art or has passion to study and document something without financial gain, that’s dumb. Ignore all those forum posts where people do exactly that

[–] ocean@lemmy.selfhostcat.com 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Thanks for the reply.

If I wrote a book I do wish I could get paid to live off of it. That said I get your point. My work will never make any money sadly lol

[–] ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago

Well of course. Me too! The only way that changes is if we change the framework of our entire economic system, really

And mine either!!

[–] veniasilente@lemm.ee 6 points 1 day ago

They had me in the first half, not gonna lie.

[–] krolden@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago

Lmao you want us to ban tiktok too? Wtf is with this paranoia