this post was submitted on 07 Jan 2025
40 points (97.6% liked)

Interesting Global News

2859 readers
601 users here now

What is global news?

Something that happened or was uncovered recently anywhere in the world. It doesn't have to have global implications. Just has to be informative in some way.


Post guidelines

Title formatPost title should mirror the news source title.
URL formatPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
[Opinion] prefixOpinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. No social media postsAvoid all social media posts. Try searching for a source that has a written article or transcription on the subject.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

Icon attribution | Banner attribution

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Donald Trump on Tuesday pushed NATO members to boost their defense spending to five percent of GDP, underlining his long-standing claims that they are underpaying for US protection.

"They can all afford it, but they should be at five percent not two percent," the incoming US president told reporters.

"Europe is in for a tiny fraction of the money that we're in," Trump said. "We have a thing called the ocean in between us, right? Why are we in for billions and billions of dollars more money than Europe?"

Trump has long been skeptical of NATO, the cornerstone of security in Europe since World War II, and last month reiterated a familiar threat to leave the alliance if its members did not step up spending.

The transatlantic alliance's 32 countries in 2023 set a minimum level for defense spending of two percent of gross domestic product, and Russia's war in Ukraine has jolted NATO to strengthen its eastern flank and ramp up spending.

Trump is not the only top official to call for an increase -- NATO chief Mark Rutte likewise said last month that "we are going to need a lot more than two percent." Rutte also warned that European nations were not prepared for the threat of future war with Russia, calling on them to "turbocharge" their defense spending.

In his remarks on Tuesday, Trump claimed that President Joe Biden decided Ukraine should be able to join NATO, suggesting that this helped lead to Russia's all-out invasion in February 2022. "Somewhere along the line, Biden said, no, they should be able to join NATO. Well, Russia has somebody right on their doorstep, and I could understand their feeling about that," Trump said.

NATO allies in reality agreed to Ukrainian membership in 2008 -- when Republican president George W. Bush was in office -- while the United States and Germany have more recently backed away from allowing Kyiv to join out of fear it could drag the alliance into a war with Russia.

The conflict "should have never been started," Trump said Tuesday, adding: "I guarantee you, if I were president, (the) war would have never happened."

top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] x00z@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

Trump does not understand a peaceful world. 2% is already a lot when most of your money is going to stuff that is actually good for the people; like healthcare, pensions, social welfare, green subsidies, you name it.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 hour ago

If USA is willing to oppress its victims in favor of endless money for the MIC, then why shouldn't europe do the same? \s

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 30 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Minimum 4 more years of this bloated orange shit stain. Fml.

[–] Professorozone@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

Don't be so optimistic. After all he did say we wouldn't have to vote again.

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 4 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Hey, don’t be so pessimistic, maybe he’ll die in office! Hoping for a Harrisonesque inauguration

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 3 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, but then it's vance, all the vitriol of trump but enough braincells to focus the hatred.

[–] Drusas@fedia.io 1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

He doesn't have the cult of personality.

[–] psmgx@lemmy.world 2 points 15 hours ago

The social media oligarchy has already kissed the ring. Vance will get whatever personality he needs from them.

[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 day ago

the US's own spending hasn't been that high since before the fall of the wall.

[–] MNByChoice@midwest.social 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They better do it. Might get invaded.

[–] Questy@lemmy.world 10 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

I mean, yea, he's already threatening to annex my country so I would like to see more spending. Specifically on a sovereign nuclear deterrent.

[–] MNByChoice@midwest.social 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I don't think a nuclear deterrent will work. Too much brinkmanship. Need an army that can be used.

[–] Questy@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I have to say it's exactly the opposite. There's no realistic conventional deterrent we could deploy that would be more than a bump in the road. On the other hand, a couple KSS-3 subs off each coast with several nuclear tipped ballistic missiles puts tens of millions of lives and trillions of dollars of infrastructure on the table. It's about making invasion unthinkable, not desperately fighting an asymmetrical conventional battle we're doomed to lose.

[–] MNByChoice@midwest.social 2 points 1 hour ago

invasion unthinkable

Only works with a thinking adversary.