this post was submitted on 06 Jan 2025
184 points (98.9% liked)

InsanePeopleFacebook

3758 readers
167 users here now

Screenshots of people being insane on Facebook. Please censor names/pics of end users in screenshots. Please follow the rules of lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MsPenguinette@lemmy.world 82 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Aight, the judge should take his car because he was using it to commit commerce with Publix to buy butter!

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 52 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Even though the Sovcit was carrying a writ of mandamus to buy butter, the Sovcit bought margarine which was not covered by the writ. Classic rookie mistake. /s

[–] thesohoriots@lemmy.world 16 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Imagine the paperwork they’d submit for an exchange instead of a receipt

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 21 points 5 months ago

"Sir, this is a Publix. We don't accept 'negotiable instruments' in payment for groceries, only cash or card. You have put down a quarter, which is indeed cash, but you keep referring to it as '0.1808 troy ounces of silver'."

[–] jaybone@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago

I Can’t Believe It’s Not Sui Juris

[–] ArtieShaw@fedia.io 2 points 5 months ago

I can't believe it's not mandamus.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 60 points 5 months ago (1 children)

"They got me on the way to get butter at the Publix" should be the official motto of this community.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago

Could be a sovcit country song, by the Winn-Dixie Chicks.

[–] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 55 points 5 months ago

Was that duty free butter? Of course not, Publix doesn't have a Customs agency, dork. You need to buy your groceries at an airport so you can say that you are travelling to a transportation center and using the roads as an easement, granting an unobstructed path. And police count as an obstruction. Just ignore them and only stop when you get to the property line of the airport. If you travel onto the tarmac, then only airport police can chase you and it will significantly reduce the amount of police who might confuse your rights if they try to detain you.

SovCits just don't know their rights. /S

[–] Aganim@lemmy.world 28 points 5 months ago (1 children)

UNIFORM TRAFFIC CITATION you say? Perhaps SovCit should try to convince the judge he wasn't wearing a uniform at the time, nor does his vessel constitutes a uniform.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

I was not participating in traffic.

[–] msfroh@lemmy.ca 22 points 5 months ago

Shoulda known better than to drive [Private] to Publix. That's how they get ya.

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 19 points 5 months ago

I can't believe it's not registered!

[–] NineMileTower@lemmy.world 17 points 5 months ago

These people are voting for representation. How can you be so tremendously stupid? HOW!?

[–] thefartographer@lemm.ee 16 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I did have a FL Driver License on me, but I told them that I was not in the capacity of a driver or driving.

Does anyone else think this sounds like they quickly popped over to the passenger seat before arguing with a police officer?

[–] misterdoctor@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago (1 children)

That’s what I was trying to figure out. He was pulled over while driving and then said he wasn’t driving, like..? Even for the sovcit community, that seems exceptionally stupid.

[–] meco03211@lemmy.world 21 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

He was "traveling". That's their workaround for not needing to have a driver's license normally.

To an extent, they are right. Everyone has the right to travel freely. As in, a state is not allowed to restrict your ability to go from point A to point B. However, ~~wroth~~ with all things legal, it's subject to reasonable limitations. You can walk from A to B unless that causes you to cross a busy highway on foot. You can't drive around other taxpayers on taxpayer funded roads without a valid DL.

[–] misterdoctor@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I feel like these guys are generally well intentioned, and I empathize with the broad strokes of what they’re going for. They just seem to always go about it in the most poorly thought out way possible.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.world 14 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Not sure how many of them are well intentioned. Seems like a lot of them are just looking for excuses to get away with not doing shit everyone else has to do.

[–] AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I don't know if I'd consider it "well intentioned", but I sympathise with sovcits because actually there's a hell of a lot that regular people are expected to do but the rich and the powerful aren't: "rules for thee but not for me" energy. SovCits are silly for thinking that they can say some magic words to make the system's loopholes work for them, but I don't think they're too unreasonable for wishing that to be the case. I don't think their approach is productive, but I think that they at least are seeing and responding to the same injustice that motivates me and many in my community

[–] jaybone@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I get to some extent where you are coming from. But there’s a reason we register cars and pay taxes for roads and stuff like that. (Yes the wealthy exploit this. And that is wrong. That needs to be fixed. But the concept of being part of a society is that we all contribute.)

[–] AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net 2 points 5 months ago

Oh yeah, I definitely agree with you on this — the answer to "society is being harmed by selfish people who are exploiting the system while not contributing back" isn't "I will give up on society and instead try to become one of the selfish people who see themselves as exempt from the social contract". My comment was just explaining why, as well as scoffing at SovCits, I also grieve for them, for lack of a better word; As silly and arrogant as they often are, I pity and even somewhat sympathise with them.

Certainly there have been many times in my life where I have bought into a lie because it was easier than acknowledging that some awful injustices could be allowed to happen. In particular, in recent years I have been grappling with negative self talk that arose after a severely traumatic period in my life, where it was more palatable to convince myself that I deserved what happened to me than to acknowledge the truth that no-one deserves that, that it shouldn't ever happen in a just world, and yet it did. Those lies are less public than the ones that SovCits fall for, but buy-in comes from a similar place, I feel.

[–] thesohoriots@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago

You were not in capacity, or incapacitated shall we say

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 5 months ago

Surprised they didn’t tow the vehicle.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

Shoulda conveyed, the laws cover traveling now

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Was sovcit's mom stuck somewhere?

[–] BonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

She was trying to pay for her house with a silver coin and the bank wouldn't listen.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 3 points 5 months ago

I was talking about the butter.

[–] TheFriar@lemm.ee 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

With everything going on right now, some dumbass sovcits eating shit is exactly what I wanted to read. Thank you, Bonesofthemoon.

[–] BonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

You're welcome! I'm endlessly amazed by their persistent belief in something that has never worked for anyone.