this post was submitted on 06 Jan 2025
644 points (98.3% liked)

News

23764 readers
4067 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 58 points 1 day ago

Man, I wonder why

[–] pjwestin@lemmy.world 64 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's very interesting that pro-Luigi posts are immediately and universally censored while pro-Jan. 6th posts are given a lot more leeway. Both were attacks on powerful members of the ruling class, but only one group of sympathizers is being completely shut down. It's tempting to think that it's because tech billionaires have a right-wing bias, but I actually think it's worse than that. I think it's because the January 6th riots represented a partisan divide, while Luigi's (alleged) actions have received bipartisan sympathy. Apparently, violence and terrorism are acceptable unless they lead to class solidarity.

[–] Zugyuk@lemmy.world 6 points 20 hours ago

What they gon do? Fill jury with ceos?

[–] DrFistington@lemmy.world 62 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You mean it's a challenge to censor and suppress popular sentiment? Maybe stop fucking trying

[–] SoJB@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 day ago

Can you even fucking imagine if this was about China? The liberal Reddit Lemmitors would be frothing at the mouth about The Great Evil. Meanwhile it’s just another boring article in the freest greatest nation in the world.

[–] Scrollone@feddit.it 102 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Why are they removing those posts? Luigi Mangione is innocent until proven guilty.

[–] Saleh@feddit.org 29 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Let's be real though. People are not sympathetic with Luigi because they believe he is innocent. They are sympathetic with him, because they believe he killed the mass murderer CEO Brian Thompson. If he is found innocent and another suspect is produced, Luigi would get sympathy for being wrongfully persecuted and the other suspect would get sympathy for killing the mass murderer CEO Brian Thompson.

Now the question is, why sympathy towards killing a mass murderer is seen as a problem, but being a mass murderer in the way Brian Thompson was is not only accepted, but for mainstream media apparently making him particularly deserving of empathy.

The answer is very obvious, but you won't read it in any of the mainstream media outlets. Because the rich and powerful are fighting a class war against everyone else and the mainstream media is representing the class interests of the rich and powerful, even as the middle class income article writer has his family murdered by the very same people who he tries to invoke empathy for.

The problem with Luigi is not that people are sympathetic towards violence. If the violence is racist or bigoted, if dozens of school children are murdered this is fine. It is not threatening the power of the ruling class. But people realizing that the power of the ruling class is not based on merit, but on brutality, deception and scrupulousness and can easily be toppled by an organized population, that is a gigantic threat.

And that is why the very same people that would demand for precision in talking about suspects of corruption or rich and famous criminals to always be considered innocent until proven guilty, will quickly toss this principle aside in cases like Luigis.

[–] zeroday@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 1 day ago

Hi! I'm one of those people who has sympathy for Luigi because he did it. I think the deaths of CEOs like Thompson, billionaires, etc are necessary to create any sort of systemic change that will alleviate the suffering of the working class. It's not because he's hot like mainstream news seems to think, but because I'm tired of being the punching bag of the rich in this class war that we've all been thrust into, and because Luigi fought back.

It's also interesting that the news is saying Luigi is hot and that's why people support him, when it's more the other way around and people find him hot because he shot Thompson.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 52 points 1 day ago

its only challenging to moderate because corporate media is struggling to silence the majority without making it look like they are silencing the majority and provoking outrage towards them and their CEOs.

[–] Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 40 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Apparently there was a subreddit too but daddy corporate didn't like that.

[–] ef9357@lemmy.sdf.org 62 points 1 day ago

Let’s keep posting about Brian Thompson, and every other billionaire, being a mass murderer. That’s all the billionaire class is. Criminals, grifters, less than human murderers protected by the ruling class. US “democracy” working as intended.

[–] distantsounds@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago
[–] rekabis@programming.dev 201 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Why moderate?

The working class is under no obligation to mourn the deaths of those who are actively trying to kill them for profit.

[–] jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de 75 points 1 day ago

There's a difference between not mourning a piece of shit and asking for the murder of his peers. The hypocrisy of oligarch-run media (social and traditional) is that they stop having an issue with murder if there's an Excel spreadsheet between the instigator and the victim.

[–] JonsJava@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (9 children)

Because this instance (and all other instances) physically reside in countries with content laws. If we don't follow those laws, we can be shut down, and the admin/owners that reside in those countries could face legal consequences.

[–] zergtoshi@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah, it's a pity that the laws appear to be protecting those the best, who are responsible for the most suffering - after all those have the power to get those laws written.
But that's the thing: there's a difference between 'legal' and 'legitimate/true' behaviour.
While I understand that lemmy instances (et al) have to adhere to legal behaviour, I hope that people adhere to legitimate/true behaviour.

[–] Azzu@lemm.ee 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Most people don't just randomly stumble into legitimate/true behavior. We're apes, we see something and then do. If it all gets moderated away, the chance for legitimate/true behavior drops dramatically.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Grass@sh.itjust.works 133 points 1 day ago (2 children)

censorship, not moderation. and of course free speech only applies to enabling racism and such

[–] callouscomic@lemm.ee 30 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I mean free speech actually only applies to government, not social media.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago

And it doesn't always apply to governments. The Lemmy.world server is in The Netherlands. It's illegal in The Netherlands to threaten violence. So posts threatening violence are deleted so that Lemmy.world can stick around.

This makes some people who feel like they should be allowed to say whatever they want, wherever they want angry at us moderators, but we like Lemmy.world and they don't have to be here if they don't want to. Unfortunately, some people have a massive sense of entitlement, as the ban evader in World News who told me that he shall not be censored found out the hard way this morning.

Sorry, your right to threaten to kill someone is less important to me than Lemmy.world sticking around. There are other Lemmy servers that might allow it, but this one doesn't for legal reasons.

[–] MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You censor via moderation though right?

[–] Fiivemacs@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 day ago

Only thing that needs moderation is the parasites paycheques..

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] return2ozma@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

Somebody even made a Luigi cake

[–] xc2215x@lemmy.world 34 points 1 day ago

I am okay with it being there.

[–] Apytele@sh.itjust.works 111 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

I'll tell you what, I'll advocate right now for nonviolence. I really like that luigi didn't kill any of the general public, regardless of anything else he may or may not have done. It's really important to remember in this day and age to not cause widespread suffering to a large number of everyday people who are just going about their normal daily lives.

[–] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 day ago

It’s really important to remember in this day and age to not cause widespread suffering to a large number of everyday people who are just going about their normal daily lives.

Someone needs to tell the CEOs.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I agree with you, but I am very worried that any possible copycats might be less discerning. Especially if CEOs start hiring security forces and there are either gun battles or bombings where people get caught in the crossfire.

Not every person with the same agenda as Luigi Mangione's will be as careful to only hit their target.

[–] deaf_fish@lemm.ee 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I see having a reasonable take on this is also giving you downvotes. I think the pro Luigi group has a problematic subgroup that wants to murder anyone.

If it were up to me, I'd start figuring out a way to separate that subgroup out. Otherwise you're going to end up with someone randomly murdering and painting the whole thing as just murderers with no ideological point. That will kill whatever good work this is done.

[–] dragonfucker@lemmy.nz 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

And yet some people are already trying to paint this act of self defence as a murder, and citing as evidence collateral damage that hasn't even happened yet and may never happen. It's a slippery slope fallacy. We have laws. Luigi is innocent and we can't punish Luigi just because somebody might copy what he allegedly did badly and cause collateral.

[–] deaf_fish@lemm.ee 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Self defense? Are you implying the CEO was going harm Luigi directly? Or eventually though healthcare denial?

[–] lud@lemm.ee 1 points 23 hours ago

And that the murder he (allegedly) committed did in some way save him.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 day ago

This is actually a good point. It seems like, these days, most public violence like this, ends up with a senseless killing spree, and dead bystanders.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] WilderSeek@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The behaviors of some CEOs are making it easy. Oops! Did I victim-blame?

[–] banshee@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago
[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 day ago
[–] NutWrench@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 day ago

What's to moderate? That insurance companies prevent doctors from delivering effective health care? That insurance companies regularly abuse the contracts they have with customers and deny their claims for arbitrary reasons? That by removing all non-violent options for customers to appeal an unjust decision, they leave only violent ones? This is just basic reality. Removing complaints about insurance company practices is not "moderation." That's just censorship.

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Holds up empty glass Refill Pls

[–] nutsack@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

why moderate it? i don't think all of it is breaking terms of service necessarily

load more comments
view more: next ›