this post was submitted on 02 Jan 2025
493 points (97.0% liked)

Technology

60330 readers
4493 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] doingthestuff@lemy.lol 14 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I was just commenting on a thread about public transportation (there's none where live) and someone commented that they're moving to micro transportation by just buying a $3 Uber every time they need to go somewhere. Even if uber is only taking $1 of that, $2 isn't paying someone to drive you somewhere. Uber drivers should make at least $30/hr.

[–] wellheh@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I haven't done the math but if you don't drive that much, did it beat their yearly costs (maintenance/insurance/gas)? Honestly that scheme is wild but makes total sense for a customer because not having to deal with car maintenance and insurance seems like a good tradeoff. I wonder when the dominos are all gonna tumble for these driving companies

[–] doingthestuff@lemy.lol 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I don't know where the person who commented that lives, but you can't get an Uber five blocks for under $10 around here. If I was that close and walkable I'd just walk. I do know uber is losing drivers locally though because they don't pay enough, certainly not enough for people to maintain their cars. It's predatory employment at this point, and it is becoming normalized.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I took one recently and found out Lyft was taking the ride at a loss. (They must average out the rides). I needed to drop my vehicle somewhere for maintenance, called a Lyft and it was something like 5.42 before I added a tip. I asked the driver when it had gotten so much cheaper and he said he had been doing well and checked and was getting paid $9 before tip for the ride. Told him I was giving him $10 for going out of his way as a tip, and the app actually wouldn't allow me to tip that much, I couldn't get above 9.58 or something. Anyways, slower areas they must be taking a loss to try to get more market in the area.

Also, Lyft has always been better for me when needed, Uber won't allow me to schedule a ride, so you have to wait till you want to leave, and in a slow area that just means... There might not be anyone. If I schedule it with Lyft for a set time I've never had an issue with that.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

I think the problem is: what they call a "Tip" is more like a "Bid"/"Offer". People see "Tip" and thus believe its optional, I mean it technically is optional, but the base pay is like $2.50 so its customarily required. I think for even the shortest delivery of a place 10 minutes away with a 2 mile distance is supposed to tip at least $5. and if the delivery is done in 30 minutes, that's an effective wage of $15/hour, that is, if they get orders back-to-back.

Customers don't understand how this works and puts $0 as the "Tip", buts its really a "Bid", effectively making anyone who is willing to accept the order, to work below minimum wage. And also new drivers doesn't understand how this works and acceepts orders without a good enough "Bid", effectively working below minimum wage.

I mean, why even call it a "Tip" if its customarily required, just change the base pay to $7.50 (which I'm sure those companies will charge the customer for it, but anyways...). So for an order that takes 30 minutes, its an effective wage of $15/hour, assuming they get orders back-to-back. Much less confusion amongst both customers and drivers.

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

I think for even the shortest delivery of a place 10 minutes away with a 2 mile distance is supposed to tip at least $5. and if the delivery is done in 30 minutes, that’s an effective wage of $15/hour, that is, if they get orders back-to-back.

Since these shitty companies don't provide vehicles or gas money most of that $15 is going to vehicle costs.

When I delivered for a pizza place in the late 90s in a midwest college town with my own car I got 15-20 per hour between base pay, gas and car use subsidy, and tips. That business was 90% deliveries, so the delivery was baked into the cost.

[–] LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Americans be crazy. I never tipped in my life and ain't about to start.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

why even call it a "Tip" if its customarily required,

Nice psyop there tbh... Why fuck over your worker when you can shift that blame on your idiot customers?

It is your fault Joe delivery guy doesn't get paid!!!!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] PedroMaldonado@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

Buddy, I cant use that service in any good concience...

[–] cyrano@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

“Minimum wage and the idea that hard work should lead to economic security, can be — and are being — destroyed by these A.I. systems.”

[–] jbloggs777@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Not A.I, just a terrible system that incentivises (and even demands for public companies) abusive behaviour.

[–] Atherel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yep, blaming it on A.I. is just an easy way for corporates to shift the blame to something they can't control. A.I. is just a tool, the people using it and HOW they use it are responsible for the outcome.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] higgsboson@dubvee.org 6 points 1 week ago

Lol. AI has so very little to do with this. That's only mentioned because it's the latest bogeyman.

[–] RagingSnarkasm@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›