this post was submitted on 01 Jan 2025
339 points (95.2% liked)

No Stupid Questions

36279 readers
918 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Can one still claim that the USA is a liberal democracy? Where do you draw the line?

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

if money = power then liberal (democracy) = oligarchy

[–] Blaze@sopuli.xyz 4 points 6 days ago

Feel free to crosspost to !AskUSA@discuss.online

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

It's at least a Soft Oligarchy yes. There's no legally or extra legally enforced class system. If you can make it into the upper classes, by guile, luck, or sheer bastardry they'll accept you and let you run some things, maybe even political offices. See J.D. Vance, a millennial from Appalachia who has risen to the Vice Presidency via guile and sheer bastardry.

But it's a Soft Oligarchy because opportunities are far from equal. Before anyone starts screeching, equality of outcome isn't an expectation here, merely equality of opportunity. In the large majority of cases your zip code can predict your future socioeconomic level. And not because rural areas are cheaper, that just means middle and upper class start at lower numbers there. Those classes are still not being obtained. Along with this are several studies over the last couple decades telling us that socioeconomic mobility is all but dead, both individually, and more recently, intergenerational mobility.

So while you aren't going to be killed or imprisoned for earning too much or asking for stuff above your station, it is very rare to access those levels without being born to them. Thus the "soft" in Soft Oligarchy.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

There's no legally or extra legally enforced class system.

Lol wat?

US has a strict class system. There is owner class and working class, they get treated differently under the law.

For example, look at how owners get taxed v how regular people get taxed. That's legally enforced class.

.D. Vance, a millennial from Appalachia who has risen to the Vice Presidency via guile and sheer bastardry.

Regime propaganda relies on these stories to justify the class system. Every generation gets a few of this class traitors so pedons can be told... You see loser, if you worked harder, daddy would reward you too! Now back on the planstation, start making daddy some mother fucking money.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

The tax system doesn't care where you came from. In a Hard Oligrachy it would. You would never escape the working class tax system or justice system and those systems would be designed to prevent you from changing classes, to the point of destroying anyone with the pretensions to try. The fact that you can access that other standard of treatment means the class system isn't enforced. If you want to say it's highly encouraged I would agree with you, but this isn't some conspiracy to have a couple winners that get highly propagandized, and there's no law against socioeconomic mobility.

Examples of Hard oligarchies are countries like Russia and Saudi Arabia. In Russia you will go out a window because someone powerful didn't like your competition and you have no protections; and in Saudi Arabia you will be arrested for pissing off the Royals.

The US is bad enough without exaggerating shit to make it seem like the worst. That leaves us unable to see what we might want to keep. Like the way the justice and healthcare systems treat rich people, we should all have that.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

You would never escape the working class tax system or justice system and those systems would be designed to prevent you from changing classes, to the point of destroying anyone with the pretensions to try

This is practically how it functions, working class rarely becomes owner class.

there's no law against socioeconomic mobility.

There is a set of laws that protect owners property, they get cash transfers from the government budgets, their legal entities get preferential tax treatment. Sure anyone can start business technically but capital is needed...

US increasingly doesn't have social mobility, you parents social rank correlates strongly with your own out comes.

In Russia you will go out a window because someone powerful didn't like your competition

Boeing milled its whistleblower, nothing happened.

Esptain committed "suicide"

JFK, mlk and malcom X got killed by the ruling class.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 0 points 5 days ago (1 children)

So it's conspiracy theories.

Have a nice day.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 1 points 5 days ago

So it's conspiracy theories.

Lol, they are about as valid as whatever the government is shilling. It does make one wonder why so much of government records related to these murfers are classified still...

[–] dullbananas@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

The closest thing we have to democracy is our ability to begin democracy by fighting against first-past-the-post voting systems

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 days ago

The government controls all media. If they do not control one and it get big, it gets 'regulated' like TikTok or even banned. The general public will vote for the oligarchy as instructed.

it's very close to turning into one.

It's not quite there, but trump is definitely not one to shy away from it, so it mostly depends on who he appoints and interacts with. And how corrupt he will be.

[–] 7fb2adfb45bafcc01c80@lemmy.world -4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

No, we will never be an oligarchy. A plutocracy, yes, but I think money is the deciding factor here.

[–] Furbag@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

A Plutocracy is merely an Oligarchy by virtue of wealth. It's not as if you or I could ever earn enough money legitimately to move up to the ruling class. That makes it functionality indistinguishable from an Oligarchy that is hand picked by arbitrary factors.

[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 159 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Pretty sure it crossed that line decades ago.

[–] pdxfed@lemmy.world 48 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Late 19th century. There was some pushback, some anti-trust laws with teeth, and then decades of bloody union battles to secure rights workers and their elected officials have thrown away for 50 years.

The concentration of wealth and influence of 10-16 people trumps that of hundreds of millions and is as bad or worse than it was during the robber baron era.

Political representatives are bought and paid for which means the poor have no voice against the wealthy.

We have a justice system that is incapable of prosecuting the wealthy and powerful, when it isn't being stocked by ideologues.

Meritocracy is dead; Birth has much greater correlation to wealth and power.

Media is fully captured by the wealthy; they own the vast majority of media consumed: TV, film, news, social junk.

Nice country you got here.

[–] Eldritch@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

Remember when unions thought they were so Irreplaceable and important. That they would withhold Support for a second term from a Democrat, they didn't think did enough for them. One of the biggest miscalculations and blunders of the post World War II era. Because first they came for the unions and labor power.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SARGE@startrek.website 117 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I say this in nearly complete seriousness:

Always has been

🌎🧑‍🚀🔫🧑‍🚀

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] AndrewZabar@lemmy.world 91 points 1 week ago (6 children)

It has been an oligarchy for a long time. This has been studied and proven.

[–] Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

proven

Please explain. I don't disagree with the conclusion, but this supporting statement doesn't ring true to me.

[–] AndrewZabar@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

By demonstrating the facts which make the system meet the definition. Look it up there's plenty of articles citing studies. Someone else linked a major one here.

[–] Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

"Look it up" is never a good argument. With that said, I understand what you mean now; Thank you.

[–] AndrewZabar@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

“Look it up” is not an argument, it’s a suggested course of action. I explained my point and then suggested you look it up in order to see it more elaborated and supported.

I wasn’t aware there was an argument taking place; certainly not one involving me.

[–] Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Sorry, I just assumed that you were being hostile for some reason.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] CMahaff@lemmy.world 81 points 1 week ago

Well in 2015 Jimmy Carter said that the United States is "just an oligarchy, with unlimited political bribery being the essence of getting the nominations for president or to elect the president. And the same thing applies to governors and U.S. senators and congress members. "

That same year The Economist's Democracy Index downgraded the United States to a "flawed democracy" and it has continued to trend downwards since then.

If you're looking for something more recent, Bernie Sanders is saying the same thing: "We are moving rapidly into an oligarchic form of society. Never before in American history have so few billionaires, so few people, have so much wealth and so much power".

So between the massive (and growing) income inequality in the country, and rulings like Citizen's United it's hard not to believe it's not at least on the trajectory towards an oligarchy. Now throw in the blatantly corrupt picks of the Trump administration, where cabinet positions are favors to rich friends, or being given to billionaires with a direct interest in killing the government agency they are running - not to mention all the things he's routinely done / will do to enrich himself / friends with tax payer dollars and it certainly seems like an oligarchy to me.

And just on a personal vibes level, living here, it feels like legislation to help normal people or solve normal people's problems is almost non-existent. And when it does happen, it also conveniently throws a ton of money at the rich at the same time (see recent tax cuts, pandemic relief funds, etc.). Even something like the Affordable Care Act, which did a ton of net good things for this country, enriched a whole lot of private healthcare companies along the way rather than creating an actual public option with negotiated prices to keep government costs down.

[–] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 77 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Turned? Have you ever heard of the Rockefeller and Morgan families?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] gi1242@lemmy.world 62 points 1 week ago (1 children)

the US is run by billionaires and corporations.

you can live in peace as long as you don't inconvenience them too much, and keep paying them

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 19 points 1 week ago

Stop dancing to their tune and you quickly discover how much freedom you really got

The only solution is to quit being ~~boomer~~ poor lol

Edit: Interesting auto correct

[–] Dead_or_Alive@lemmy.world 43 points 1 week ago
[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 34 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Tbh I think the most recent election and its implications makes the facts abundantly clear.

[–] snekerpimp@lemmy.world 29 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I would say corporatocracy. Ever since Citizens United, corporations have been making more and more policy and political decisions, placing in power who they believe will advance their agendas of unlimited and never ending profit.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 27 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Corporations are fiction of law.

Owners are a few very wealthy individuals who abuse this fiction and the state against the pedon class.

It is a class war and always has been.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ___@lemm.ee 27 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I think it’s worse. I think we have noble houses fighting for the throne again. The Bush family, the Clinton family, they wanted Michelle Obama.. In what sane democracy does the family member or wife of the last elected leader make sense as being the best option? Forget oligarchy, we have a straight up monarchy brewing with a nice democratic paint job.

[–] stinky@redlemmy.com 2 points 1 week ago

Blood descendants are a foundation of monarchy though

[–] Draces@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago

The Bush family, the Clinton family, they wanted Michelle Obama

That's how an oligarchy works though. A few powerful people, usually dynastic families, decide how the country should be run. You're giving an example of oligarchs picking an oligarch. How is that evidence of monarchy rather than oligarchy?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SplashJackson@lemmy.ca 23 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The rich were behind the mutiny in the first place, so, always has been

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I'll take merchants over nobles, but that doesn't mean they both don't deserve a guillotine.

[–] SplashJackson@lemmy.ca 4 points 6 days ago

But the nobles were the good guys, don't you see? It was all in the name, "noble". How could bad guys possibly be so noble?

[–] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 21 points 1 week ago (2 children)

citizens united is where I would draw the line and no I don't think we are an oligarchy but a plutocracy. Honestly Im not even sure if that is the right word because the money itself has the effect and the various wealthy people spending it. I don't think they even really understand what they are doing. So its more like being ruled by money rather than the wealthy per se and honestly the ones calling the shots are the financial entities so corporations. Part of it may just be their relative power and active global decision making bend. News articles talk about musk possibly being the first trillionaire but mean while corps have based a trillion as early as 2008 and now many multi trillion dollar companies are around and the top add up to tens of trillions. So corptocracy. We had enough of that to begin with but now its out of control. Someone recently posted the international agreement that allows corps to sue countries and that finished up in the 90's so it not only started before but is also not just a us thing.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 week ago (3 children)

That was the case since the 80s

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›