Memory, Sorrow, and Thorn by Tad Williams
this post was submitted on 28 Dec 2024
25 points (100.0% liked)
Books
10450 readers
60 users here now
Book reader community.
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
Hmmm.
- „The dark is rising“ Series by Susan Cooper
- „The Moon of Gomrath“ by Alan Garner
- „The Innkeepers Song“ by Peter S. Beagle
- „Stardust“ by Neil Gaiman
- „The Night Circus“ by Erin Morgenstern
- „Jonathan Strange & Mr. Norrel by Susanna Clarke
Those were on top of my head. There are probably many many more. Also check out other books by the authors I mentioned.
I'm more of a sci-fi guy but I listened to Joe Abercrombies The First Law trilogy as audio books and holy shit was it great. Ended up devouring the 3 standalone books and the following Age of Madness trilogy that plays out in the same world. Very dark stuff and I believe fits within the requested "soft magic" setting.
The Priory of the Orange Tree might fit what you are looking for. I've only learned the term soft magic just now so I might be wrong but magic in that world is mysterious and feels similar to Lord of the Rings. However there's multiple types of magic and one of the main characters understands a bit more about one of those types and thus knows a bit about its limitations iirc so we as the reader are introduced to those a bit. Overall I'd say it probably fits.
Howl's Moving Castle - the book showcases it a lot better than the movie. Kind of kiddush but that makes it a fast read, and I really appreciated the magic system.
A serial web story by Wildbow named "Pact" has a pretty interesting soft magic system with a decent amount of depth.
Description of Magic System
All characters who can use magic in the story are not able to lie on penalty of their magic power being greatly reduced. The magic system is based around tiny spirits who listen to and judge people. There are powers in 3s, power in performance, powers in name, yet despite this the magic system still feels ad hoc, like you can make magic happen that you would not normally be capable of if you are just smart enough, poetic enough, and persuasive enough to the spirits...
Magical beings feel Eldritch, actively dangerous, and typically very clever. The ones who are clever typically have very good mental models of what makes humans tick, yet clearly do not fall under the same rules.
Did someone say The Wheel of Time? I recently read the first two books and it seriously has me hooked. Definitely has a softer magic system similar to LotR, at least so far! I definitely recommend.
The wheel of time is the greatest fantasy series ever written and i will die on this hill
The Chronicles of Amber. By Roger Zelazny
The Riftwar Cycle might fit. The magic system starts off with the users having a hard understanding of how magic works only to learn how soft and pliable it really is.
That said, this series is like 30+ books and is put it at half of them being really good and half being a grind while nearly all of them are dated in fantasy style.
Not exactly an answer to your question, but I wanted to put in a pitch for one of my favorite talks about magic in fiction:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jeb_mSOgrVg
The Lord of the Rings and "The Last Unicorn" are the only works of fiction I'm aware of that have magic that works the way TF is describing it.
I appreciate it nonetheless. I'm gonna check it out here in a few, thanks!
Maybe Robin Hobb’s Farseer trilogy? I feel like it fits the soft magic definition somewhat
And it’s also fantastic
"The Realm of the Elderlings" in general I'd say.
what makes a magic system soft. just not a lot of it like lotr?
https://habitwriting.com/hard-magic-vs-soft-magic/
Hard Magic System: A type of magic that has specific rules that the reader understands and which limit a magic user in what they can do.
Soft Magic System: A type of magic that–though rules may apply to it–does not have specific limits that are expressed to or known by the reader or audience.
Basically how much readers are exposed to the mechanics of the magic system, and thus how realistic or constrained-to-reality the magic seems. Harry Potter and LotR are probably more in the soft magic category, whereas Brandon Sanderson's novels have good examples of hard magic.
Sanderson, who coined the terms, describes Potter as being a pretty good example of a mixed magic system.
Which makes sense to me. The spells they learn at school are a pretty hard magic system. But then things like "the power of love" are more reminiscent of a soft system.
Thank you, I do think this was mentioned in the article I linked, and it does seem like Harry Potter is a good example of a mixed system. In my mind what makes it a soft system more fundamentally is how the author is inconsistent and the way magic is never really restricted by rules, even if there is a lot of focus on classes and how the spells are conjured, etc.
The magician by Lev Grossman
Magician (and the rest of the riftwar cycle) by Feist
Might be worth taking a look at David Zindell's "The Ea Cycle".