this post was submitted on 18 Dec 2024
1137 points (99.1% liked)

Memes

8497 readers
1718 users here now

Post memes here.

A meme is an idea, behavior, or style that spreads by means of imitation from person to person within a culture and often carries symbolic meaning representing a particular phenomenon or theme.

An Internet meme or meme, is a cultural item that is spread via the Internet, often through social media platforms. The name is by the concept of memes proposed by Richard Dawkins in 1972. Internet memes can take various forms, such as images, videos, GIFs, and various other viral sensations.


Laittakaa meemejä tänne.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 hours ago

They want to make Luigi an example. "Don't do what he did, he's being quickly processed with terrorism added to the charges. You don't wanna be a terrorist do you?"

[–] PanArab@lemm.ee 45 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

They are terrified. He did terrorize their class. So maybe just maybe being a terrorist isn’t bad, it depends on who you terrorize?

[–] AbsoluteChicagoDog@lemm.ee 6 points 2 hours ago

The only difference between a terrorist and a freedom fighter is your point of view.

[–] KneeTitts@lemmy.world 23 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

funny how murikans are Super against gun violence all of a sudden when it happened to a rich white male.. but not so much when its a class full of poor kids

[–] knexcar@lemmy.world 7 points 3 hours ago

Seems like most Americans are pro Luigi, but the government isn’t

[–] ignotum@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago

The kids were already born, they don't give a shit about them after that

[–] dogsoahC@lemm.ee 65 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

It pretty neatly fits the definition of (individual) terrorism (which doesn't really exist). It was an act of violence, not based on personal grievance with the direct victim, but based on grievance with the system he represented. But, yeah, they probably wouldn't ever pull that when someone gets murdered for racist reasons, which you could also classify as terrorism.

🎶 Because it's about class and not about justice. 🎶

[–] Strawberry@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 hours ago

This is kinda the OG definition of terrorism actually. Back when 19th century anarchists invented this hot new direct action political tactic called terrorism. It was all the rage, for a while, but it backfired and increased public sympathy towards the bourgeoisie and the nobility.

[–] MountingSuspicion@reddthat.com 8 points 5 hours ago

For what it's worth, we do have hate crime laws that are supposed to be used in cases where racism is at play. I'm not saying it's always used, but we do have additional penalties for it.

[–] NutWrench@lemmy.ml 34 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, trying to upcharge this from murder to "terrorism" is going to backfire spectacularly in the prosecutor's face.

[–] Olgratin_Magmatoe@lemmy.world 17 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Let's hope. But as we all know truth is financially dictated in our "justice" system, so it is a gamble.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 21 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I love how they media seems shocked whenever they find Americans who have been radicalized, when one of their counterparts have been radicalized Americans for the last handful of decades.

[–] HeartyOfGlass@lemm.ee 17 points 5 hours ago

That's on purpose - by acting shocked they expect viewers to react the same way. It's essentially telling their audience how to feel about the story without outright saying "you should feel like this".

[–] vga@sopuli.xyz 8 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (2 children)

That might be a good thing, because making a terrorism charge stick ~~is going to be~~ should in a just world be really really difficult.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago

Is it a separate charge?

He can still be convicted for 1st degree.

[–] tempest@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 hours ago

I thought you could just mutter terrorism under your breath and then say 9/11 and stick them in a cell forever.

[–] atro_city@fedia.io 70 points 11 hours ago (13 children)
load more comments (13 replies)
[–] sumguyonline@lemmy.world 42 points 11 hours ago

Who do we charge with terrorism for people being forced to watch their loved ones die from preventable causes that were denied treatment and cures by insurance companies? Asking for some revolutionaries I might or might not know.

[–] robocall@lemmy.world 37 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

Rumor has it, if you say, "deny, defend, depose" in your phone 3 times, you'll get charged with terrorism too. Hopefully you're an American citizen or else it's off to Guantanamo bay for you.

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 10 points 8 hours ago

If you say "Gitmo Bay" three times in the mirror, a dark universe Obama appears and snatches you.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 33 points 11 hours ago (4 children)

The unconstitutional Patriot Act says they can do that to citizens too, as long as they're suspected of terrorism. That's why everything is "terrorism" these days, because under that accusation they'll strip you of your constitutional rights and do whatever the fuck they want. It's tyranny.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›