this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2024
306 points (99.7% liked)

Privacy

35244 readers
385 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] iturnedintoanewt@lemm.ee 70 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Can we have the names in the headlines of which MPs keeps consistently putting this crap on the agenda multiple times every year for the last couple of decades?

[–] Churbleyimyam@lemm.ee 6 points 3 months ago

I add my voice to this request. Cough up the names.

[–] Undertaker@feddit.org 52 points 3 months ago (4 children)

To clarify: eMail, web chats, gaming chats, Signal, Threema and so on are affected as well

[–] eleitl@lemm.ee 22 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Self-hosted Matrix is obviously unaffected.

[–] toastal@lemmy.ml 12 points 3 months ago (1 children)

You say this but Matrix is largely centralized so it would be easy to get the biggest node to comply. Servers are quite costly to run too which is a big problem.

[–] eleitl@lemm.ee 5 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Federated protocols are not centralized in principle. It might not scale to one user-one server (which probably even Lemmy can't handle) but if you're signing up for a central server, you're doing it wrong(tm). Don't do that. The nice thing about Matrix client is that it allows end to end encryption, including groups. So that greatly limits what Mallory can do in principle. As to servers being costly to run, given what documented Synapse requirements are, you're looking at less than 5 EUR/month for a single server. Which can be shared among several users, obviously. This is in the same range as costs for a monthly VPN.

[–] EngineerGaming@feddit.nl 9 points 3 months ago (2 children)

His point was the main Matrix.org server being way too prominent. In every given groupchat, chances are somebody is on this particular server. It is also the default for many clients.

[–] toastal@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 months ago

The default links many folks/projects share specifically log you into Element & on Matrix.org as well which advertizes more folks to be on that centralized node. Furthermore, Matrix provides hosting for some of the other big servers as well even if they are not using matrix.org in the address.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] toastal@lemmy.ml 6 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Synapse boasts about 50,000 concurrent users on a node. Ejabberd has been tuned to 2,000,000 concurrent users which shows how efficient & scalable the setup can be. €5/mo is a lot for many folks.

[–] EngineerGaming@feddit.nl 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Monero-paid VPSes cost more, and given this fact, my €5 VPS (with a few other services already running there) would apparently not be enough for Synapse... But an XMPP server runs perfectly.

[–] eleitl@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Poor people (who still can afford the end devices and an Internet plan) can of course share the costs in a community, or use one of the many free servers, as long as they are aware of the tradeoffs. Beigers not being choosers, and all that.

[–] toastal@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 months ago (7 children)

You can also choose to use technologies that aren’t such resource hogs. The eventual consistency model of Matrix alone & storage costs causud many medium-sized operations to shut their doors. Distroot.org for instance had to move to XMPP to deal with costs—& I have personally seen others.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] airikr@lemmy.ml 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Self-hosted XMPP using OMEMO included? OMEMO are based on Signal, hence my question.

[–] RubberElectrons@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

First I'd ever heard of OMEMO, thanks dude

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] muntedcrocodile@lemm.ee 25 points 3 months ago (2 children)

The americans seem to have figured out how to get change in relation to health insurance. Perhaps people might consider taking a page from the french history books to get some change on this issue.

[–] JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

The same French of whom more than a third want an authoritarian strongman in power? Personally I would prefer to copy the handful of boring countries where people actually trust their leaders and so don't feel they need to resort to bloody revolution at the drop of a hat.

[–] Hiro8811@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Alright I want all farmers on a 30km range to join our next "peaceful" protest

[–] Manzas@lemdro.id 20 points 3 months ago

Why are they still thinking they can justify this? People which do illegal stuff are just going to use old apps self-host or bypass it with another way.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 9 points 3 months ago

However they want to do it, it will undermine a key principle of democracy and a human right: the right to privacy and private communication.

[–] Dalaryous@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 months ago

Those damn Chinese and their censorship... oh wait

[–] x00z@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

Some suggestions: Scan, Privacy, Control

[–] kylian0087@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 months ago

Just watched a video of Low level: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tRATnT577Aw

Although this is about the US this is EXACTLY the shit that will happen to this whole chat scanning BS

load more comments
view more: next ›