this post was submitted on 30 Nov 2024
832 points (99.2% liked)

Science Memes

11399 readers
1275 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] niktemadur@lemmy.world 98 points 2 weeks ago (7 children)

...and we only did it because there was a dick-waving contest between two nations.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 54 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Considering the relative speed of literally everything we can experience as humans, and that light ranks at the tippy top of every single one of them as INSTANT in pretty much any context other than math homework, it's honestly pretty fucking wild that we not only got humans 1.3 light-seconds away from Earth, but got them back alive to tell about it.

That is straight up amazing.

[–] el_abuelo@programming.dev 13 points 2 weeks ago

Yes and no. I get the point and do actually agree whole heartedly but I think it obscures the reality that we've been observing solar systems as they existed millions of years ago.

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

We ain't hardly been nowhere in the 'verse yet.

[–] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 35 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

And those objects that are now 46 billion light years away move away from us faster than light.

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 20 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

They are not moving faster than light.

The distance between us and them is increasing at a rate than means light leaving earth now could not ever reach them. Such is the impact of an expanding universe.

[–] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 14 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 8 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Your point of view is 46 billion years out of date.

...but I like the meme.

[–] Donkter@lemmy.world 27 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

You're right, let's send 1 person into the fuck of space just to say we did it.

I'm not being sarcastic.

[–] Hossenfeffer@feddit.uk 10 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)
[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Let's invent teleportation, then use the teleporter to merge them into a homunculus flesh beast, and then launch that thing into the sun.

Unrelated, but I thought it would be a good idea.

[–] P00ptart@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Homunculus is a little person that is proportional. You cant merge two tall, fat fucks and get one little person. 4 or 5 homunculi, maybe. But not one.

[–] ebolapie@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

What if the homunculus argues that it, as a new and distinct being, has committed no crimes, and deserves to live? What if it begs for its life as you load it into the teleporter to ~~split it back up into your science officer and annoying morale officer~~ shoot it into the sun?

[–] rooroo@feddit.org 2 points 2 weeks ago

We’ll just get Cate Mulgrew to argue that point.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] RandomVideos@programming.dev 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Dont eat the rich

Throw them into space to see who goes the farthest

[–] InnerScientist@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

"I trust them as far as I can throw them"
"Bet"

[–] SynopsisTantilize@lemm.ee 5 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Like build one really really big space trabuchet, loaded with a space hotel with all the amenities possible for basically a one way generational ship. Then blast those fuckers towards alpha centari and call it a decade.

Oh, and just for fun, give them one life pod but it only holds 20 people.

But the real kicker? ...they never left the ground And it's all televised.

The launch sequence? Really fast merry go round.

The "artificial gravity"? Lol

The infinite food sources vending machines? Catering.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 4 points 2 weeks ago

Elon on top of a super-heavy. He can be like Solomon Epstein.

[–] Robust_Mirror@aussie.zone 3 points 2 weeks ago

Sure but even if we had stuck someone on voyager 1, it's only 23 light hours away and has been going almost 50 years.

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 20 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

And we go no further for the next 4 years

[–] KomfortablesKissen@discuss.tchncs.de 14 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Might be longer if Musk really guts the NASA

[–] dev_null@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

If Musk guts NASA, then surely it would be in an attempt to benefit SpaceX and himself, e.g. by removing regulations or funneling more money to SpaceX, and with that accelerating his Moon landing program, not pushing it back.

[–] superkret@feddit.org 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

You assume his goal is actually to get to Mars, not just dangle that as a dream in front of people while siphoning off billions of tax dollars.

[–] dev_null@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I didn't say anything about Mars, I only meant the Moon mission, which I assume would slightly push the record further just because the longer duration would give more opportunity for the wobble of the Moon's orbit to get the astronauts further than before.

Granted, SpaceX could also just fail to get to the Moon.

Considering his successes with Tesla I doubt it would get the desired results. But spacex does have some very smart cookies, so you might be on to something.

[–] Bahnd@lemmy.world 19 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

And a statistically large number of those people that we sent up there were from Ohio, one can assume because they were trying to get as far away from Ohio as possible.

[–] ZMoney@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

I think this is true of US presidents too.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Zerush@lemmy.ml 11 points 2 weeks ago

With a spaceship which reach a huge percent of lightspeed, the occupants can reach in short time many of the exoplanets in the Milky Way, only for the observer on Earth it last thousends of years. But this isn't important, after the rich people in the Spaceship had destroyed the Earth.

[–] passiveaggressivesonar@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] Quadhammer@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

You can fit all the planets in the solar system between earth and the moon

[–] passiveaggressivesonar@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Please don't, I believe you

[–] Quadhammer@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah no one ever mentions if you did do that it likely would not go well for earth

[–] zephorah@lemm.ee 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

We’re really just photographers right now.

[–] zante@slrpnk.net 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

No problem once we build the improbability drive engine.

[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

The ultimate townies, on a universal scale.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Probably a little heavy for a meme community, but why do images rendered of the observable universe appear symmetrical?

[–] FabledAepitaph@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Not an expert, but an enthusiast. The universe can typically be considered homogeneous and isotropic on a large scale (it looks the same in all areas, and also looks similar no matter which direction you happen to be looking) for the sake of understanding and performing physical calculations. The beach may also be considered homogeneous and isototropic, but we know that if we dig down, we'll find interesting materials, organisms, and even various grades of sand (for context).

The universe is roughly symmetrical even though there are structures and features of great complexity when you look close enough (such as atoms, you, me, horses, and icebergs). This is probably because the universe originated from a single infinitely dense point where there wasn't room for much diversity or clumping of matter. As the universe expanded, random quantum fluctuations and coalescence, perhaps due to gravity and the various electrical and atomic forces, is to thank for the formation of elements, stars, and galaxies, over the last 14 billion years (or however old the Universe is supposed to be).

Anyways. It's represented as symmetrical because it's convenient and true on a large scale, but its always more complicated the deeper you look.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

The symmetry is the interesting part. It’s Earth-centric symmetry. I don’t know if it’s a failure on the artist’s part, but the age appears to increase equally in all directions from the center point of the field. That’s why the question. One would think that it would be uneven, no “center”.

[–] Canis_76@feddit.nl 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

So this isn't a joke? Wouldn't that make the universe 46.5B years old? Very big bang.

The observed objects 46.5 giga ly away are about the same age as the age of the universe, but they have gotten further away from us in the time since they emitted the photons we're now observing.

[–] zante@slrpnk.net 2 points 2 weeks ago
[–] rotkehlchen@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago

You have to start somewhere.

[–] Draconic_NEO@mander.xyz 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

What are you talking about, we all know the lunar landings were faked to bankrupt the soviets /j

Seriously though, best bet for long distance space exploration just like they said in that movie is to find a wormhole. It's probably the only real way to travel across the universe in any reasonable amount of time.

Edit: Do people not get the movie reference to Interstellar?

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Why would it bankrupt the them when the Soviets were never going to the moon?

At least, that's what some people seem to believe.

[–] Draconic_NEO@mander.xyz 1 points 2 weeks ago

Not sure, I guess the idea is that in the film they were saying they faked the space race to get the Soviets to work harder and waste money, but it doesn't really make sense and I think that's the whole point. It's meant to be absurd propaganda.

spoilerWhich is why in the movie, cooper isn't at all mad that his daughter got into a fist fight with some kids over them believing and denying the original real textbooks which explain how man did actually land on the moon.

load more comments
view more: next ›