this post was submitted on 24 Nov 2024
65 points (88.2% liked)

Asklemmy

43962 readers
1242 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Depending on how the next four years go I'm on the fence between Bush Jr. and Trump but I'd like to hear from you

Edit:

Top 10 suggestions so far (unordered):

  • Andrew Jackson
  • Andrew Johnson
  • George W. Bush Jr
  • Ronald Reagan
  • Richard Nixon
  • James K. Polk
  • Woodrow Wilson
  • James Buchanan
  • Franklin Pierce
  • Donald J. Trump
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 21 points 18 hours ago
[โ€“] NeoToasty@kbin.melroy.org 17 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

George W Bush Jr.

Yes I am handing him the worst president title, even over Trump.

Because, it was his mishandled War on Terror, that plunged the country into massive national debt. He crashed the housing market. He literally had waged a war on obese people, minorities and other things as distractions from his failure to capture Osama. He allowed American Surveillance with Patriot Act I and II. His cabinet were all crooks and he was just a dumb puppet.

He is essentially the ripple effect of everything we're dealing with today and Trump is merely the symptom of that.

[โ€“] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 6 points 3 hours ago

He allowed American Surveillance with Patriot Act I and II.

People at the time were begging for that. There were a very, very few civil libertarians that realized just how dangerous those acts would be, but the people, as a whole, were really behind them. Just like the people went in gung-ho for the start of GWoT.

He is essentially the ripple effect of everything weโ€™re dealing with today and Trump is merely the symptom of that.

I'd put that at the feet of Reagan first. Reagan was the one that cozied up to the 'moral majority', which was based in racism and misogyny, what with Bob Jones University being forced to desegregate. That's where the birth of the alt-right (which I guess is now just mainstream Republicans) happened.

[โ€“] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 10 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

Trump is definitely in the bottom quintile, but also anyone putting him in the bottom 5 is just recency bias.

[โ€“] zyratoxx@lemm.ee 8 points 20 hours ago

Most people who argued for Trump said it's because of Jan 6th and his other felonies and that he was allowed to run again and became reelected (even tho a partition of the us citizens are to blame for the latter). I also think people already value him lower because of Project 2025 and out of fear what will happen during his 2nd term.

[โ€“] watson387@sopuli.xyz 84 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Ronald Reagan did more damage to this country than any president before or after him.

[โ€“] Treczoks@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

Just wait until the turd tanks the economy 1920s style.

[โ€“] AndrasKrigare@beehaw.org 23 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I'm continually shocked by how often I learn of some structural systemic issue, pull the thread to see where it started and- oh, surprise, it was once again Reagan.

[โ€“] Sauerkraut@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Most of Reagan's agenda came from the heritage foundation: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8eeCPRD0Hgg&t=0

The capital class controls the heritage foundation and through their countless think tanks, lobbyist, donations, SuperPACs, etc they control the Republican party and even a large part of the Democratic party.

Marx was correct when he argued that economic democracy was necessary for political democracy. When the wealthy get to own the economy they have the entire country by the balls.

[โ€“] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Marx was correct when he argued that economic democracy was necessary for political democracy. When the wealthy get to own the economy they have the entire country by the balls.

Funnily enough even Adam Smith warned about that even before capitalism went in full swing.

[โ€“] Cube6392@beehaw.org 1 points 1 hour ago

Adam Smith: you gotta bust up monopolies because competition drive's innovation

the rich: you heard the man! all the wealth has to be consolidated with us! greed is good!

[โ€“] digdilem@lemmy.ml 13 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

It's no coincidence that Reagan and Margaret Thatcher had such a close relationship - they thought alike.

In Britain, Thatcher is still reviled by many for sweeping changes. Killed the coal industry without giving support to the many thousands employed there and put the North into recession, took milk away from children, depowered the unions (which were too powerful at the time, tbf) and generally put the Tory Party on the London & Banks first mantra that they've been on ever since.

[โ€“] tiefling@lemmy.blahaj.zone 47 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Before or after him so far

I feel like the "so far" is implied...unless you've somehow figured out how to 100% accurately predict the future and you haven't told anyone.

...By the way, if that's the case, rude.

[โ€“] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Wasn't it Nixon who sold the americans out? Or Truman?

[โ€“] Today@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I would hire nucular George every day for the next 4 years to get rid of the orange dipshit.

[โ€“] undercrust@lemmy.ca 8 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

It is absolutely fuckin bonkers that Trump is so bad that a person can say they yearn for the good old days with Dubya without a hint of sarcasm

[โ€“] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 0 points 3 hours ago

Dubya at least had a face of 'compassionate' conservatism, and believed in the rule of law. Yeah, he bent the law a lot, but he never outright broke it. He was incompetent--or, he was at least not up to the task of being a president--but not apparently malicious.

Pity that SCOTUS stepped in with the Florida recount, since it was eventually found that Gore should have won. I wonder where we'd be on climate change now if Gore had won? Oh well Florida, enjoy your flooding and hurricanes.

[โ€“] kersploosh@sh.itjust.works 51 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (14 children)

While W. sucked in many ways, there is no way he is the worst. Off the top of my head I can easily think of four better contenders: Franklin Pierce, James Buchanan (both guilty of pro-slavery fuckery before the Civil War), Andrew Johnson (fought to let the Confederates off the hook after the war and opposed the 14th amendment), and Donald Trump (first president to be impeached twice, first to be convicted of a felony, and may be remembered by future historians as the spark that ignites the next Civil War).

[โ€“] NoIWontPickAName@kbin.earth 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[โ€“] kersploosh@sh.itjust.works 4 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

Andrew Jackson was also a bastard, especially for his treatment of natives. But I meant Johnson.

[โ€“] NoIWontPickAName@kbin.earth 4 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

I know you did, I was just adding 1

[โ€“] kersploosh@sh.itjust.works 3 points 20 hours ago

Ah, gotcha. I misunderstood.

load more comments (13 replies)
[โ€“] Nemo@slrpnk.net 41 points 1 day ago (11 children)

It's tempting to pick someone recent, but the real answer is probably Andrew Jackson. He successfully engineered a genocide, trampled the Constitution and human rights, and was actively hostile to limits on Presidential power.

load more comments (11 replies)
[โ€“] Taalnazi@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Plenty of choice. In my view, most presidents were rambling reeking right wingers in some way or other, save for FDR and Teddy Roosevelt, who were the two presidents I'd actually call capable and outspoken on civil rights (rather than just pragmatical like Lincoln). They did have their blemishes, but less than e.g. Andrew Jackson.

So many presidents were terrible for one people or another.

Andrew Jackson? Held hundreds of slaves and quite literally led an ethnic expulsion against Native Americans (the Trail of Tears).

Lincoln? Mostly good, but did not forbid slavery in the form of penal labour. If one were to abolish slavery, why not go the full mile?

Wilson? Rabid antisemite, pretty much.

Hoover? Might've tried to tackle the Great Depression -- but did so by allying with large coorporations, effectively being corrupt and choosing bribery.

Truman? Dropped nukes and set the stage for "we support any government that hates people being remotely leftist".

Nixon - corrupt and wanted to sidestep the rule of law, all for his own profit: to stay in power. Other than thaf, decent, but that's a big "other than that".

Reagan - enough said. Ultracapitalist, misleading, made the US economy far worse by accruing debt like there's no tomorrow, and shoving it onto the poor -- typical oligarch behaviour! Militaristic, power-hungry. And no, he did not end the Cold War: Gorbachov did.

JFK: socially pretty good, actually. But economically, the cutting of the top rates made the richest keep more money. At least it wasn't down below 50%, but still. Had that happened, I think the tax rates would've allowed wealth accumulation.

And so on.

So, in my view, it's hard to focus on who is the worse, and better to rather focus on what is the best. Ted would be my candidate. Not only social progress, but also economical, and in a way that favour the worker -- and he also was environmentally aware. That is a good president.

[โ€“] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 3 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

FDR and Teddy Roosevelt, who were the two presidents I'd actually call capable and outspoken on civil rights (rather than just pragmatical like Lincoln). They did have their blemishes

Blemishes? FDR seized the property of 200,000 Americans and threw them into concentration camps because of their race. The guy's bottom 10 if not bottom 5. He's easily the worst Democrat of the last 100 years.

[โ€“] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

lol trump is bad but not like Andrew Jackaon bad.

Probably

  1. Andrew Jackson - Crimes against native people
  2. Andrew Johnson - Fucked up reconstruction
  3. Ronald Reagan - Trickle down economics
  4. 45/47 ๐Ÿคฎ - We all know why...
  5. Richard Nixon - The Infamous Crook

Might have some memory gaps, but these are what I can remember from the top of my head.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next โ€บ