this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2024
221 points (98.3% liked)

Technology

59438 readers
3416 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Note: Original report by Bloomberg, article by Reuters proxied by Neuters to bypass paywall.

top 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] vortexal@sopuli.xyz 9 points 1 hour ago

If this happens, I'd be interested in seeing how this effects ChromeOS. I don't use it but my mom does.

Also, if you're confused as to why ChromeOS would be effected, while it's based on Gentoo Linux, ChromeOS uses a modified version of Chrome as it's Desktop Environment.

[–] ColdWater@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 hour ago

LoL they won't, even if they buy it for 1 trillion dollar

[–] Rogue@feddit.uk 39 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

Google will bribe trump and this'll be undone immediately

[–] 0xb@lemm.ee 2 points 47 minutes ago* (last edited 47 minutes ago)

That would be the logical thing according to common sense and probably according to pichai a few weeks ago, but trump just nominated an anti big tech and musk friend to the FCC. musk is behind almost everybody in ai and autonomous cars so he'll definitely push to hamper all competitors.

Sure, we don't know how far would they go or how long will musk keep having white house influence and I personally think breaking up google is now off the table, but I don't think they will get off the hook too easily.

So surely a very big bribe.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 28 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Google is such a good company, one the best. Everybody says it. I was just talking to John Google the other day, and he tells me, no really he did, he tells me we're going to do amazing things together. Oogles of googles. That's what we'll sell. Everybody will know about google by this time next year. It's true.

[–] errer@lemmy.world 9 points 2 hours ago

God damnit.

[–] barkingspiders@infosec.pub 70 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

Lit. It's a good ask although it's not clear what separation means here. Not going to hold my breath, the big corpos seem to usually win these kind of games.

[–] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 41 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Chrome is now owned by a separate conpany with the same major stock holders.

[–] Eldritch@lemmy.world 22 points 3 hours ago

It's like they're a company pretending to be another company, disguised as another company. Tropic Thunder all the way down.

[–] Arkouda@lemmy.ca 43 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Chrome is now owned by a company, owned by a company, owned by another company, that is owned by Google.

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 27 points 2 hours ago

And even in the case where there is actual separation, and competition, it will only be temporary!

see history of telco consolidation after a monopoly breakup in 1984

[–] MCasq_qsaCJ_234@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

What if Linux foundation buys Chrome?

[–] Joker@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 hours ago

They already have Servo.

[–] very_well_lost@lemmy.world 31 points 4 hours ago (2 children)
[–] Twitches@lemm.ee 10 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

If you're talking about edge browser, edge is chrome.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Ew. So if someone likes their girlfriend to tie them up and edge them, that means they enjoy a breach of privacy, and getting google involved?

[–] Twitches@lemm.ee 7 points 2 hours ago

Google does like to watch.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

HA!

What a joke.

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 6 points 4 hours ago (4 children)

What's to stop them just making another browser?

[–] btaf45@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

What’s to stop them just making another browser?

Nothing. Chromium is open source. So they could just fork it and declare a new "official" google browser and it would be a lot like Chrome.

I'm not sure why the govt thinks forcing google to give up a particular fork/branch of an open source browser is all that meaningful. It might make more sense if Chrome was a closed source one of a kind browser.

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 1 points 1 hour ago

That's exactly what I was thinking. It also makes Chrome essentially worthless to anyone except Google.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago

They didn't make the first one! They got it from Apple, who themselves got it from KDE.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 5 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Not needed. Internet Explorer existed for years after the 90s. It wasn't killed by the courts. It was killed by the fact that it's only function was to install a better browser on first boot.

[–] cdf12345@lemm.ee 5 points 2 hours ago

I think you are severely underestimating how many people don’t even understand the difference between windows, explorer, a web browser and even the Internet itself during the 90’s well into the 2000’s even 2010’s.

That’s who kept IE alive

[–] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 8 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

With blackjack and hookers?

[–] AdamEatsAss@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago

I'm 40% internet browser.

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee -2 points 3 hours ago

Potentially.

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 4 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Ugh. Just link to Reuters.

[–] Joker@sh.itjust.works 11 points 4 hours ago (2 children)
[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 9 points 4 hours ago

It has a soft paywall.

I think the common practice is to link to the original in the URL bar and then use the body text to do paywall/loginwall removals.

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 0 points 3 hours ago

This is probably the real reason corporate America had no interest in endorsing Harris.