this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2024
139 points (97.9% liked)

Technology

59438 readers
3334 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Note: Original report by Bloomberg, article by Reuters proxied by Neuters to bypass paywall.

top 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Rogue@feddit.uk 16 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Google will bribe trump and this'll be undone immediately

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 9 points 57 minutes ago (1 children)

Google is such a good company, one the best. Everybody says it. I was just talking to John Google the other day, and he tells me, no really he did, he tells me we're going to do amazing things together. Oogles of googles. That's what we'll sell. Everybody will know about google by this time next year. It's true.

[–] errer@lemmy.world 2 points 11 minutes ago

God damnit.

[–] MCasq_qsaCJ_234@lemmy.zip 2 points 27 minutes ago (1 children)

What if Linux foundation buys Chrome?

[–] Joker@sh.itjust.works 1 points 23 minutes ago

They already have Servo.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 1 points 12 minutes ago

HA!

What a joke.

[–] barkingspiders@infosec.pub 48 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

Lit. It's a good ask although it's not clear what separation means here. Not going to hold my breath, the big corpos seem to usually win these kind of games.

[–] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Chrome is now owned by a separate conpany with the same major stock holders.

[–] Eldritch@lemmy.world 16 points 1 hour ago

It's like they're a company pretending to be another company, disguised as another company. Tropic Thunder all the way down.

[–] Arkouda@lemmy.ca 31 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Chrome is now owned by a company, owned by a company, owned by another company, that is owned by Google.

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 11 points 51 minutes ago

And even in the case where there is actual separation, and competition, it will only be temporary!

see history of telco consolidation after a monopoly breakup in 1984

[–] very_well_lost@lemmy.world 22 points 2 hours ago (2 children)
[–] Twitches@lemm.ee 7 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

If you're talking about edge browser, edge is chrome.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 1 points 59 minutes ago (1 children)

Ew. So if someone likes their girlfriend to tie them up and edge them, that means they enjoy a breach of privacy, and getting google involved?

[–] Twitches@lemm.ee 4 points 48 minutes ago

Google does like to watch.

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 4 points 2 hours ago (3 children)

What's to stop them just making another browser?

[–] grue@lemmy.world 1 points 3 minutes ago

They didn't make the first one! They got it from Apple, who themselves got it from KDE.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 3 points 55 minutes ago (1 children)

Not needed. Internet Explorer existed for years after the 90s. It wasn't killed by the courts. It was killed by the fact that it's only function was to install a better browser on first boot.

[–] cdf12345@lemm.ee 1 points 7 minutes ago

I think you are severely underestimating how many people don’t even understand the difference between windows, explorer, a web browser and even the Internet itself during the 90’s well into the 2000’s even 2010’s.

That’s who kept IE alive

[–] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 5 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

With blackjack and hookers?

[–] AdamEatsAss@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

I'm 40% internet browser.

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee -1 points 1 hour ago

Potentially.

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

This is probably the real reason corporate America had no interest in endorsing Harris.

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 4 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Ugh. Just link to Reuters.

[–] Joker@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 hours ago (2 children)
[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 8 points 2 hours ago

It has a soft paywall.

I think the common practice is to link to the original in the URL bar and then use the body text to do paywall/loginwall removals.