this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2024
98 points (97.1% liked)

CassetteFuturism

2383 readers
430 users here now

this is a space for Cassette Futurism -- retro images, media, design and technology from the 70s and 80s

*reposts to get started, mods welcome

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The entire movie embodies Cassette Futurism, but IMO the self-destruct sequence is particularly great. The entire process looks so satisfying that I probably wouldn't be able to stop myself from running it if I were one of the crew.

More of it here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J9CqREun_Bg

top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee 12 points 16 hours ago

Thats was complicated like that just because they didn't want Jones to activate it by "accident".

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 23 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

This is how a self-destruction system ought to be. An extremely long, and somewhat complicated series of hoops. Because you seriously don't want to just accidentally flip a plastic cap and hit a button or even require a key or two.

And the only movie to depict one this way is the one where you want the ship to blow up and not be miraculously stopped at the final seconds. The tension!

[–] WanderingVentra@lemm.ee 6 points 18 hours ago

Mmmm... Look at that satisfying gif

[–] GammaGames@beehaw.org 8 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Alien Isolation is awesome if you want to walk around in a space like this, the animations and environment are really well done. Even the save system has this whole punch card and timer, it can be tense when you know the alien is nearby!

[–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I played it in VR. But not for very long

[–] addie@feddit.uk 5 points 12 hours ago

By the time you've paid for the game, a headset, a suitable graphics card, and about two dozen pairs of trousers to ruin for every hour of gameplay, then that sounds a pretty expensive hobby.

[–] witty_username@feddit.nl 4 points 17 hours ago

Reminds me of this video about real world mechanisms that are used for arming nukes:
https://youtu.be/F1LPmAF2eNA

[–] sag@lemm.ee 10 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

This and Bladerunner is on my watchlist.

[–] BertramDitore@lemm.ee 10 points 20 hours ago

This is one of those movies that sticks with you. The aesthetic blows me away every time, from the very beginning. The sets are incredibly cassette-ey while super sleek and modern for the time, and obviously fully practical. Quite possibly my favorite movie in terms of set design. You can tell the overall design is timeless because it changes very little across the decades that they’ve been making Alien movies.

[–] m_f@midwest.social 11 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, Blade Runner is also amazing at capturing the aesthetic. I watched the final cut version of it, which is the only one that Ridley Scott got complete creative control over. Haven't watched the other cuts but did check out the monologue voiceovers on youtube that are on some of the other cuts, and I didn't care for them. The happy ending on some of them also seemed silly. There's a whole Wikipedia article about the various versions lol.

Haven't yet watched Blade Runner 2049 yet, but I've heard it's worth watching. Not quite as good as the original, but not much worse.

[–] sag@lemm.ee 2 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

Is there any difference between different cuts in Story and Aesthetics? Or Is it same?

[–] m_f@midwest.social 3 points 9 hours ago

Other than the happy ending on some cuts providing a different tone for the ending, I don't think there's any difference in the story/aesthetics

[–] moonlight@fedia.io 5 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Yes. The original was butchered by studio execs that didn't understand the film. I've only seen clips of it, but it's pretty bad.

The final cut is what I and most people recommend. It's a small aesthetic and pacing change over the "directors" cut.

And definitely watch Alien too!

[–] sag@lemm.ee 3 points 10 hours ago

(ˊᗜˋ)/ᵗᑋᵃᐢᵏ ᵞᵒᵘ*