this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2024
293 points (98.0% liked)

Technology

59415 readers
2881 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 2 points 1 hour ago

This is such a shame, I mean we could be putting those bots to good use.

Can I get a rule 34 on these robots?

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 1 points 2 hours ago

While the robotic dog seen at Mar-a-Lago is not armed, she says competitors appear to be experimenting with models that are.

“People are trying to weaponise these dogs,” Cummings adds, citing a Chinese model with an attached rifle which she learned about at a robotics meeting this week.

[–] scumola@sh.itjust.works 20 points 4 hours ago

All these AI detection sentry robots are all trained on the same AI datasets. Just wear a black see-through hood over your face with a stop sign on your front and back and they'll ignore you and probably stop walking when near you. You can waltz right in.

[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Coo at them. Pet them. Call them a good doggie. Drop a treat on them, all in defiance.

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

That's a unique approach to suicide-by-cop

[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 48 minutes ago* (last edited 47 minutes ago) (1 children)

The ones at Mar-A-Lago are unarmed.

My approach to the armed ones, particularly the TASER-equipped ones used by some US law enforcement departments, would be very different.

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 1 points 35 minutes ago

They are also not autonomous. They have armed secret service agents very nearby. If the sensors on the dog alert them, trigger happy armed guards will come.

[–] douglasg14b@lemmy.world 8 points 5 hours ago (3 children)

Isn't this a perfect foreign adversary opportunity for spying on U.S. political figures?

Just integrate your own robot dog, or compromise an existing one. And surveillance away.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 1 points 5 minutes ago

Foreign adversaries already had Trump installed. Why would they need to go through extra work.

Hell - the new Director of Intelligence is a Russian asset.

[–] perestroika@lemm.ee 3 points 2 hours ago

Level 3000 hack: compromise security with drone fleas that jump onto drone dogs.

Level 9000 hack: join the pack with a drone attack dog.

[–] RangerJosie@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I'm sure the secret service is absolutely thrilled.

[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 8 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

I'm sure the secret service is absolutely ~~thrilled~~ complicit with his horseshit

[–] RangerJosie@lemmy.world 4 points 4 hours ago

Probably.

I have zero faith in our institutions. They'll quietly do their jobs until the dictator has them purged.

[–] masquenox@lemmy.world 8 points 5 hours ago

I'd like to pet it with a .50 cal.

[–] AeonFelis@lemmy.world 4 points 4 hours ago

These are not good boys

[–] RaoulDook@lemmy.world 48 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Well here we are, with all the signs of everything going as badly as possible fully present. Goddamn evil robot sentries guarding the fascist dictator-wannabe's personal luxury habitat. At least down there, if one of those things malfunctions and hurts somebody it would have to be one of the worst people around.

This is certainly not the future I dreamed of as a child and young man.

[–] prof_wafflez@lemmy.world 9 points 6 hours ago

The adults sold us a future they were determined to destroy before it could ever come to fruition.

[–] Kekzkrieger@feddit.org 11 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

can you just approach them and turn them over so they cant get up themselves anymore,, would be some fun activism?

Or is that a crime already in such a free country

[–] LePoisson@lemmy.world 8 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

https://youtu.be/jEBELMDT6cE?t=262&si=dprkjYTi5nhRjbuK

You can't really keep them from getting back up, they won't stay on their sides perfectly balanced because of the curves on their legs. Even so they could "kick" their legs to push them to be able to get back up.

Just in case you're wondering in the future if that will work.

[–] CascadianGiraffe@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

This is how you start the Great Robot War.

[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 26 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

will it also say "move along citizen there is nothing to pet here" in a male robot voice?

[–] Stalinwolf@lemmy.ca 4 points 5 hours ago

It can, but it comes out more like "ROOVE ARONG RITIZEN!"

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 23 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Probably because Trump hates real dogs.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 3 points 6 hours ago

I think the bronzer has a bad effect on them.

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 39 points 13 hours ago (5 children)

This is one of my favorite Black Mirror episodes. God help us.

[–] Peter_Arbeitsloser@feddit.org 2 points 6 hours ago

The moment when you seem them and suddenly everything turns black & white. Oh no.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] fakeman_pretendname@feddit.uk 69 points 15 hours ago (11 children)

Oh, those are just to stop the kids escaping from the paedodungeon.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] AmidFuror@fedia.io 159 points 17 hours ago (4 children)

Because they're eating the dogs, the people that stay there, they're eating the cats. They're eating the pets of the people that live around there, and this is what's happening in our country, and it's a shame.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] etchinghillside@reddthat.com 4 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

It’s a golf coarse… it’d be perfect for the simplicity of wheels.

[–] HeneryHawk@reddthat.com 1 points 5 hours ago

They're robots, probably don't "rough"

load more comments
view more: next ›