this post was submitted on 14 Nov 2024
42 points (92.0% liked)

World News

246 readers
544 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be a decent person
  2. No spam
  3. Add the byline, or write a line or two in the body about the article.

founded 1 month ago
MODERATORS
Deceptichum@quokk.au
Grainne@lemmy.dbzer0.com
PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat
42
Australia backs UN resolution recognising ‘permanent sovereignty’ of Palestinians in major departure (www.theguardian.com)
submitted 3 days ago by Deceptichum@quokk.au to c/world@quokk.au
4 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

At a UN committee vote on Thursday, Australia voted with 158 other countries, including the UK and New Zealand, on a resolution to recognise the “permanent sovereignty of the Palestinian people in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, and of the Arab population in the occupied Syrian Golan over their natural resources”.

top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Sundial@lemm.ee 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Seven, including the US, Israel and Canada, voted against the resolution while 11 others abstained. The vote will now proceed to the UN general assembly.

Isn't this the kind of thing America vetoes? Or is this another process?

[–] abff08f4813c@j4vcdedmiokf56h3ho4t62mlku.srv.us 8 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

It's a separate process as per https://news.un.org/en/story/2022/04/1116982 and https://news.un.org/en/story/2024/04/1148896 - this resolution is in the UN General Assembly, whereas vetos apply to things that get sent to the UN Security Council.

When the USSR tried to use it's veto to end the Korean war, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_General_Assembly_Resolution_377_(V got passed to provide authorization to allow the UN members to continue fighting in support of South Korea.

Also see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emergency_special_session_of_the_United_Nations_General_Assembly

[–] Sundial@lemm.ee 3 points 3 days ago

Thanks for the reads.

[–] small44@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

Isn't voting against this literally mean that they think Israel already annexed the West bank?