this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2024
943 points (98.1% liked)

People Twitter

5226 readers
2302 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

You need to explain that, though they are generally rich, it's not unusual for unheard of princes to occasionally fall on hard times and have their fortunes compensated until they are able to pay a ransom to get a corrupt bank or government to release their vast wealth back to them AND that they are almost always grateful to anyone who assists them in paying that ransom.

Oh wait, sorry, wrong scam.

Wouldn't you find it useful to be able to prove that you paid for something? When you buy an NFT, you're buying just that: the ability to prove that you bought it. And sometimes it even comes with a copy of an image or a spaceship you might just be able to use in a video game or just hold on to until we develop the technology to live in video game spaceships and you sell it for massive profits!

[–] AVincentInSpace@pawb.social 23 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is bait. It's gotta be.

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 215 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Mom's new boyfriend is a smart fella, but her son seems to be a fart smella.

[–] Steamymoomilk@sh.itjust.works 35 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Modern day poetry, 👌👌👌👌

[–] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Most hilarious tongue twister for kids under 10:

One smart fella, he felt smart
Two smart fellas, they felt smart
Three smart fellas, they all felt smart

[–] Etterra@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago

How did this one not make the rounds when I was a kid? All we had was Claude Balls, Seymour Butts, and Jack Mehoff. Oh and super racist stuff about the Polish that stays dead.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] P4ulin_Kbana@lemmy.eco.br 15 points 1 day ago (2 children)

If this was Reddit this would be posted on a "CryptobrosLs" communities or something

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 day ago

Reddit has had a "Buttcoin" subreddit making fun of Bitcoin since 2011!

[–] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 158 points 2 days ago (8 children)

I’ve read that blockchain itself is a good technology. NFTs are a laughably absurd attempt to exploit that technology for profit.

Xitter op needs to shut up.

[–] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 145 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (49 children)

Blockchain is a solution in search of a problem. A way to establish trust while not trusting any party is a cool concept, but in the real world it's far easier to establish a source of trust.

[–] stebo02@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 2 days ago

It is a bad solution though, because it revolves around wasting tons of energy in solving made up problems no one actually needs the solution to. I know there's alternative cryptocurrency that use better methods or solve actual problems but 90% of it is bitcoin.

[–] taladar@sh.itjust.works 28 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Congratulations, now your trust relies on your subject never becoming important enough that someone bothers to run 50%+1 of the nodes in your network which means only very, very large subjects (or ones where trust wasn't very important in the first place) ever even have a chance of that not happening. What do you say? Your technology doesn't scale to very, very large subjects because of abysmal transaction rates?

[–] prototype_g2@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

now your trust relies on your subject never becoming important enough that someone bothers to run 50%+1 of the nodes in your network

Yup. Very well said. People don't realize the extent of wealth inequality (and how ridiculously resource intensive blockchain tech is). If anything important were to be decide by a blockchain, the top 1% would control the network.

More on wealth inequality here.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Today's inequality was created by the Cantillon effect.

[–] davidagain@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] uis@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago

Soviet Union launched Venus-8

load more comments (47 replies)
[–] djsoren19@yiffit.net 19 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It's one of those things where scientists discovered something interesting and novel, and then a bunch of dumb grifters came in to try and make it their new snake oil.

A very, very long time ago, back when Bitcoin was viewed as a currency instead of an "investment" platform, Bitcoin kinda fulfilled the ideal use case for the blockchain. I think now the general public is just too soured on them for that to ever be the case, unless Elon makes Bitcoin the new currency of the U.S...

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 51 points 2 days ago (40 children)

What problem does blockchain solve?

[–] cRazi_man@lemm.ee 112 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Having too much electricity and not enough CO2.

[–] taladar@sh.itjust.works 19 points 2 days ago

We recently developed AI for that purpose though which does the same thing but is useless in occasionally funny ways.

[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 25 points 2 days ago (12 children)

Apparently, it can be very secure. If “pieces” of a secure key are stored in multiple places, for example, only changing one link in the “chain” means it won’t match with the others. They ALL have to be changed at the same time, which is virtually impossible to do in secret.

Please note that I am far from an expert on the subject. I’m paraphrasing an article I read months ago.

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (38 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] vordalack@lemm.ee 5 points 1 day ago

Turn that into an NFT, nerd.

[–] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 51 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] knatschus@discuss.tchncs.de 18 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Isn't he on top of many of these pyramid chains?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 25 points 2 days ago (2 children)

My advice is for you to wipe my butt clean with your tongue my guy.

[–] SynopsisTantilize@lemm.ee 15 points 1 day ago

Ah fuck. I'm in a public stall and just giggle farted.

[–] Zink@programming.dev 6 points 1 day ago

I’m not your bidet, buddy!

[–] superkret@feddit.org 34 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Relationships are like the blockchain.
There's no trusted, central database of all relationships that determines what is or isn't cheating.
That trust is negotiated in each interaction.

Marriages follow the traditional method of a chain of trust. There is a central database that lies with the government or the church, and everyone decides which database they want to trust.

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago (2 children)

You must have an interesting social life that every time you hook up, all past relationships immediately contact each other and vote on whether you are a cheater.

[–] Sculptor9157@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 day ago

His real name is Scott Pilgrim.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 28 points 2 days ago

My advice would be "shut the fuck up and listen".

[–] Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world 36 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Open with…

Paste

Ok I’m done for now.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›