this post was submitted on 12 Nov 2024
186 points (98.9% liked)

World News

39032 readers
2460 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Russian lawmakers passed a controversial bill banning “child-free propaganda” to reverse a demographic slump and promote traditional family values.

The bill targets materials that promote a conscious rejection of having children and includes fines and deportation provisions.

It comes alongside existing bans on LGBTQ+ relationships and gender reassignment.

all 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] tiefling@lemmy.blahaj.zone 73 points 5 days ago

Coming soon to an American state near you!

[–] breadsmasher@lemmy.world 59 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Took me a moment to understand this headline wasnt banning “propaganda that doesn’t include children”

[–] UsernameHere@lemmy.world 14 points 5 days ago (1 children)

China and Russia are pushing their people to have more kids and increase their numbers while amplifying the sentiment that people from enemy nations shouldn’t have kids.

[–] riskable@programming.dev 20 points 5 days ago

Because nothing says, "I should have children" than living under an overbearing autocratic government trying to control your life!

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Children are future workers, soldiers and parents.

These countries see that birth rates are dropping in the west and are looking to become dominant in numbers.

[–] MartianSands@sh.itjust.works 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I'm pretty sure their concern is their own birth rate dropping, actually. Have you seen the demographics graph for Russia? They're facing a complete collapse of their working-age population in a decade or two

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 1 points 1 day ago

I haven't to be fair.

Doesn't help when you send the men to war.

[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 4 days ago

~~promote traditional family values~~ *produce more meat for the imperial meatgrinder

[–] fluxion@lemmy.world 21 points 5 days ago

Russia giving JD Vance some great new policy ideas

[–] solomon42069@lemmy.world 11 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

The only thing more pathetic and limp than this law is the men who wrote it.

[–] eran_morad@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago (1 children)

LOL. Fuck the blyats. The war will just accelerate their demographic crisis.

[–] boreengreen@lemm.ee 4 points 5 days ago

I have a feeling that they are planning to use the survivng ukranian women and children for something.

[–] Pjonathan@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Putin enacting a law that wont affect him in his life time…

That is not the problem. Politicians should often be forward-thinking. In the US, failure to plan more than 2 years ahead is a huge detriment to infrastructure funding. Of course, central long-term planning à la USSR that does not consider market developments is an example of how wrong the opposite extreme can go.

[–] scottmeme@sh.itjust.works 7 points 5 days ago

Lmao, not like anyone is gonna want to have kids there anyway

[–] Roflmasterbigpimp@lemmy.world 0 points 4 days ago

CAN something like this really works? Because its not like he did anything at all to make life for familys easier.

[–] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee -2 points 5 days ago

Ƿ get it, Y hæv ė brıdıŋ fetic.

spoilerWe get it, you have a breeding fetish.

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 0 points 5 days ago

Oh thank Moses I was wondering when all the flood of people telling me to not have kids was gonna stop! /s