this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2024
194 points (99.0% liked)

World News

39000 readers
2313 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Taiwan’s government is closely monitoring reports that SpaceX has requested its Taiwanese suppliers to relocate manufacturing to countries like Vietnam and Thailand due to “geopolitical” concerns, specifically potential conflict with China.

Taiwan's Economic Affairs Minister JW Kuo expressed confidence in Taiwan’s resilient supply chain but acknowledged the situation.

The request has sparked anger in Taiwan, with some accusing Musk of being ungrateful for local suppliers. The incident has also garnered attention in China, with some praising Musk’s foresight regarding China’s unification goals.

all 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] thefluffiest@feddit.nl 77 points 5 days ago (1 children)

So Elon knows Trump will throw Taiwan to the Chinese lions. Noted.

[–] ChocoboRocket@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)

But doesn't Trump hate China?

Obviously he's extremely succeptable to bribery/flattery etc so he could easily "art of the deal" Taiwan off to China.

Personally I feel like he's definitely having a vindictive king renaissance so I'm expecting a lot of inflexible decisions made entirely on impulse - because that's exactly what the people want.

Don't know if I see him going to war with China as getting bribed is better than fighting and potentially losing. Plus, fighting implies you don't have enough power/influence to win without fighting and Trump is all about projecting power.

If he does want war, I wouldn't be surprised to see an American foreign legion formed out of the 20 million immigrants he wants to deport

[–] alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

A war with China would not be good for American business interests in Taiwan.

[–] RangerJosie@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The only business interests Chump is concerned with are those with his name on them.

[–] alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml -1 points 3 days ago

We are analyzing why Musk would get his business out of Taiwan. One possible reason is that Elon expects Trump to defend Taiwan, since either China not attacking or a very quick Chinese victory leave businesses largely intact.

[–] JeffKerman1999@sopuli.xyz 71 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Yeah so musk knows that trump will roll over and china do whatever

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 30 points 5 days ago (2 children)

People are saying Trump will cause WWIII. I don't think so. I think Trump will create Oceania, Eurasia and Eastasia. No point in having a war with each other if you can just take whatever territory the other two don't want and the other two won't interfere.

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 9 points 5 days ago (1 children)

WWIII was already about to happen, now the spinning plates are being handed to the closest thing we've got to the antichrist. Sorry for sounding bothered

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)

But with who? Trump isn't going to go up against Putin and Putin and Xi are allies, so he won't go up against Xi either.

Much easier for all of them to turn a blind eye to each other for the foreseeable future with three authoritarians in charge.

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago (1 children)

So you're imagining a stable power vacuum as the greatest superpower in history willfully shrinks due to the leadership of a foreign asset?

Respectfully, why?

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

No, I said what I was imagining:

I think Trump will create Oceania, Eurasia and Eastasia. No point in having a war with each other if you can just take whatever territory the other two don’t want and the other two won’t interfere.

There is no power vacuum there.

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I just don't see how that translates to the game board as it stands without a world war ensuing. There are enough nuclear powers in the world that someone is popping off before we get there.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Not interfering with each other would mean no war with each other.

[–] Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago

A three-sided Cold War that stays cold has been the goal for a while. America has agreed.

Three bullies dragging the world along while they control their people and other nations with fear and the promise of economy.

[–] fluxion@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Imagine deporting all immigrants and then waging war to bring their countries under your control. It's just insane enough that I could see MAGA doing it.

[–] billiam0202@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I mean, once all the work that immigrants do now stops getting done, someone is gonna have to do it. And slaves are cheaper than Americans who might demand a livable wage.

[–] JeffKerman1999@sopuli.xyz 10 points 5 days ago

Don't worry, Americans right now don't have a livable wage

[–] fluxion@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Why look elsewhere when we have perfectly healthy children that could fill in some of the gaps?

[–] DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 4 days ago

Or prisoners. Just might need to conveniently jail a lot of dissidents soon.

[–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 29 points 5 days ago (1 children)

This is honestly the most terrying thing I’ve read all day. What have Putin and Trump told Musk that led to this decision?

[–] Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world 14 points 4 days ago (1 children)

That they have no intention of defending Taiwan would be my guess.

Probably because Donald thinks Elon can spin up competitive manufacturing by jumping three times fast.

[–] alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml -3 points 4 days ago

That they have no intention of defending Taiwan would be my guess.

You're reading this backwards; war would cut US interests in Taiwan. If anything, this is preparing for the US to try to defend Taiwan.

[–] Pacattack57@lemmy.world 20 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Why the fuck would they do that? Those plants are the only things keeping US interests with Taiwan. Does anyone actually believe the US would guard them so heavily if they didn’t have resources we needed?

So china is praising musk for running from taiwan because of the horribleness that it might become part of china?

[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

That was quick. Maybe he should become head of efficiency. /s

[–] sylver_dragon@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

It's a dick move, but I can kinda understand why SpaceX would make it. There has been a push to "de-risk" supply chains, after the disruptions caused by Covid, Russia's invasion of Ukranie, and other world events. This type of de-risking was partly responsible for the CHIPS and Science Act. The US Government has a strategic incentive to have a stable and resilient supply chain for semiconductors.

For SpaceX, having critical components be only available from fabs in Taiwan is a risk to business. China has been more and more vocal about it's desire to annex Taiwan. With Trump taking office, one can imagine that the US commitment to protect Taiwan may not be quite as iron clad as it has been in the past. It's not hard to imagine a future where China launches an invasion of Taiwan and the US does little more than shrug. At that point, any business which is solely reliant on Taiwan for semiconductors is going to see major disruptions.

So ya, it's a complete dick move. But, I suspect SpaceX will be far from the last company looking to build a supply chain outside Taiwan.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Someone tell him Barron's Xbox gets it's chips from Taiwan I don't care if it's true

[–] sylver_dragon@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Do you really want Musk starting a game console company?

If it distracts him, yes?

[–] RestrictedAccount@lemmy.world -2 points 4 days ago

Not a Musk fan. I haven’t been on shitter for over a year.

This is not necessarily a bad thing from a US perspective.

Starlink is a strategic asset for the United States.

It shouldn’t be in danger of being destroyed by an attack by China.