this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2024
144 points (99.3% liked)

World News

39041 readers
2504 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Australia's government plans to introduce legislation banning social media for under-16s. The proposed laws aim to mitigate the harm social media inflicts on Australian children.

The government will consult with parents, social media platforms, and experts about the age limit.

The legislation will not apply to young people already on social media, and there will be no penalties for users.

top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Kidplayer_666@lemm.ee 16 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Y’all probably will be luckier if you try to give parents tools to decide and manage it, rather than doing a top down mandate…

[–] PriorityMotif@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Australian government is pretty hamfisted when it comes to this stuff.

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Testing ground for 5 eyes secret police mass surveillance

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 week ago

Their fists got hammy from genociding so many people.

[–] Mothra@mander.xyz 3 points 1 week ago

I agree with you but this article really reflects the australian way of handling things. Rules and regulations. It's good that they're going to ask first though.

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This one is for the mums and dads... They, like me, are worried sick about the safety of our kids

Evergreen. Becoming a parent makes people paranoid. Catering to that paranoia is not helpful.

The only way to enforce these types of laws is to verify age, which means providing ID, which is ridiculous.

[–] GreatBlueHeron@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I can't understand how someone hasn't explained to them that it's impossible to enforce. I can only see two possible ways:

  1. Require every social media platform operating in Australia to do rigorous ID checks on all users to ensure no-one is under the legal age, or

  2. Somehow lock down the whole Australian internet so that users must login and then validate the identity, and therefore age, of all users. Then maintain a huge filter table to restrict under age users from social media.

Both of these are clearly never going to happen. Have I missed a simpler way to do it?

[–] Rampsquatch@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago

The simpler way is hard. It requires parents to be present in the lives of their children.

[–] ATDA@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

Even if this were enforceable I guarantee kids will just go elsewhere.

I ran servers for dumb shit like this off various free hosts in the early 00's when most of my friends still had dialup ffs.

Chatgpt will have them setting up their own federations in minutes nowadays...

[–] thenextguy@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Danquebec@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago

Yeah, I don't feel well at all with the idea of letting newborns who may not even started suckling use social media. It's a bit too soon.

[–] vaionko@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 week ago

We have had a 13 minumum age for social media here for 15-ish years, and that's not working at all. It's unenforceable.

[–] dan1101@lemm.ee 3 points 1 week ago

That doesn't work kids will just lie about their age.