About as close as we are to nuclear fusion. AI generation of shit will always be one step ahead of AI detection
this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2024
27 points (80.0% liked)
Technology
59415 readers
2808 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
couldn't matter less apparently
"As long as the news makes me angry about the things I like being angry about, I dun't really cares that it's fake"
-America
Interesting approach—to detect fake news by simulating humans’ reaction to it rather than judging the content itself.
Peak "AI" grifting.
Do we need AI for this? It's already super easy to tell fake news from real.
Is it on BBC/CBC/Routers/AP? It's probably real.
Is it on Forbes/Facebook/Xitter? It's probably garbage.
Cool. A new subscription to pay , an anti fake news suite. Another interesting subject would be how to deal with the licensing/ subscription we are facing which I think is even more problematic
Who decides whats fake. Objective reality doesnt exist especially in news.