this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2024
391 points (98.3% liked)

World News

38969 readers
2540 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

The UK has introduced the Tobacco and Vapes Bill, aiming to make it illegal for future generations to buy cigarettes. The bill proposes gradually raising the minimum smoking age, so those born after January 1, 2009, will never be able to purchase tobacco legally.

It also includes restrictions on vape flavors and packaging to prevent youth addiction and bans smoking in certain outdoor spaces, though pub beer gardens are exempt.

Supported by the Labour Party's majority, the legislation seeks to create a “smoke-free U.K.” and combat smoking-related deaths.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] cynar@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

I personally support this plan. Smoking in the UK has already plummeted. A lot of smokers have moved to vaping. Unfortunately, those left are often the ruder ones. Limiting where they cam smoke, or reduce expire for everyone else is a big dead for me.

Additionally, it's not banning nicotine, it's banning cigarettes. Vapes have changes the balance on that one. They are less damaging, and cause far less issues with passive smoking. This acts as a pressure relief valve, rather than a blanket nicotine ban. Also, at no point will an existing (legal) smoker go from legal to illegal.

The vape issue definitely needs fixing. A number have found advertising to younger users is a good money maker. Limiting the options here l, without an outright ban would help reduce the harm to children. It wouldn't significantly affect ex smokers who moved to vaping.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Prohibition has been such a huge success. The only option is expanding it! \s

[–] viralJ@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

I guess the difference between the prohibition in the US and this bill, is that the alcohol prohibition banned it to everyone at once. People who were used to drinking or down right alcoholics had a strong incentive to obtain alcohol from somewhere, so there was a market for the underground moonshine producers. This bill isn't targeting people who are already addicted to nicotine, but rather aims at preventing people developing the addiction in the first place, so I can imagine the market for underground tobacco growers or smugglers will be much smaller and less profitable. I am optimistic that this approach will be more successful than the 20s in America, but I guess we'll have to wait and see.

[–] watty@lemm.ee 13 points 1 day ago

This is literally an idea I had when I was 16 years old. I was pretty dumb when I was 16.

[–] andrewrgross@slrpnk.net 72 points 2 days ago (15 children)

Do you know what I'd like to see?

Instead of banning them, ban the extraction of profit on producing and selling them. Turn them into an entirely recreational market. I'd love to see the outcome of trying that.

[–] john89@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 days ago

I like the way you think.

Capitalists would rather there be a ban so that proles don't realize how much they're getting f**ked.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] CaptainBasculin@lemmy.ml 57 points 2 days ago (10 children)

Pushing an entire business into black market over time... Who in their right mind approved this?

[–] PlasticLove@lemmy.today 30 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Won’t somebody think of the poor struggling businesses.

Where would society be without those good old death stick sellers who hid decades of research into health risks and marketed to children. Cornerstone of society and they’re trying to ban it? Savages.

[–] Feyd@programming.dev 43 points 2 days ago (1 children)

More like prohibition doesn't work

[–] GetOffMyLan@programming.dev 26 points 2 days ago (3 children)

It'll work for the majority of people. You won't be able to do it out in public.

If you want to get cancer in your own house go ahead.

The truth is they put a huge burden on public services. Mainly the health service but also they create insane amounts of litter.

If vaping is still an option then most people will just do that.

[–] Feyd@programming.dev 10 points 2 days ago (2 children)

If you want to get cancer in your own house go ahead.

I agree with the sentiment of both you and the person I originally applied to. Smoking is a blight and I wish it would go away. I simply don't think prohibition is the way to do it.

Mainly the health service but also they create insane amounts of litter

Vaping also creates an insane amount of litter. I wish vaping would go away just as much as I do cigarettes.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] john89@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 days ago

Are you stupid? It's not about the "businesses" and their well-being. It's about the effect that black markets have on society.

People are going to get their drugs whether they're legal or not. If you paid attention in history class and reality, you'd know that prohibition and the war on drugs does not solve the issue.

[–] CmdrShepard42@lemm.ee 27 points 2 days ago (7 children)

Exactly. Smoking was dying off due to vaping until all these countries got a stick up their ass over it and decided to either outright ban vapes or put ridiculous regulations on them. This is why everyone uses disposables in the US now and toss their lithium batteries in the trash every couple days.

[–] MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works 19 points 2 days ago (14 children)

vaping was much worse because people blatantly use them indoors and wherever else they shouldn't. And due to them not needing to light up they just constantly puff on them between every three breaths. It's fucking awful being in a queue or walking behind someone vaping.

load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] GetOffMyLan@programming.dev 12 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

People who don't like cancer and want to take the insane pressure these death sticks put on the health service.

Who in their right mind supports mega corps selling addictive cancer causing products to young people?

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 days ago (6 children)

The point is prohibition doesn't work. I would prefer no young person ever try cigarettes, or nicotine in any form. But I don't think that's realistic.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] john89@lemmy.ca 16 points 2 days ago

🥱

More black markets aren't the solution.

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 22 points 2 days ago

Yah, banning drugs works great. And doing it in the most cowardly way possible really elevates that.

[–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Not here in the USA! With Trump, we're going to recycle cigarettes into baby clothes and we'll be using PTFE to bond the fibers together for a strong cancer healthcare company.

[–] olympicyes@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Sort of related but I saw that black plastic spatulas and other black plastic items contain toxic flame retardants because black plastic items are made from recycled e-waste.

[–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

It's the gallium dopants that get me excited for more. 😂

MACA - Make America Cancer Again

load more comments
view more: next ›