this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2024
59 points (89.3% liked)

Firefox

17849 readers
70 users here now

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] kalkulat@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

After many years of using FFox, I just tried a Zen install on Linux. It did not turn out as well as I hoped.

I did not have FFoxesr installed in the way the OS would have installed it (though it was still in the user folder). This meant that Zen did/could not see my bookmarks, extensions or passwords ... and the options it offered didn't work out. (It wanted an HTML bookmarks file ... I had them saved as JSON ... and a 'CSV' (??) passwords file ... wherever that is ... and it found no extensions folder.) So, for starters, years of customizations had to be manually restored.

But, fair shake, I did manually re-install bookmarks AND a few extensions that had saved databases (e.g. UBO, NoScript, Block site). (It ignored the sub-folders in the JSON bookmarks folders, dumping all bookmarks into the top-levels.) And I had to re-create all the settings. (Most of which exist in the .mozilla folder on Linux ... easy to find.)

I played for an hour with what I put there (without a menu bar ... or a tab bar, all URIs are shoved together -by name- in a sidebar ... I did figure out how to see a bookmark bar). I could discern no -truly useful- advantages to it. None. That was not offset by some pretty cosmetics. So even if you do get all of your customizations past the one-size-fits-all install, for long-time FF users I see no substantial advantages to the Zen browser.

[–] mitrosus@discuss.tchncs.de 14 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I am sure the article is written by chatGPT

[–] brrt@sh.itjust.works 7 points 4 days ago

I expected so much more from a website called “techwavearena” /s

[–] phorq@lemmy.ml 5 points 4 days ago

Yeah, reads more like a wikipedia article than a news article, like someone took several sources and told ai to combine the info. Facts are great, but they don't make for a captivating read on their own. There's a sweet spot for opinion/reflection without too much bias that makes news sources worth reading.

Check out the official website, it explains many more features https://zen-browser.app/

[–] qweertz@programming.dev 6 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Is there any reason to use this over Librewolf?

[–] kalkulat@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

Practically speaking, probably not.

[–] Soliprem@lemmy.ml 10 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

The UI/UX. Nothing else, to be fair. They have some nice features (like 'glance'), too

[–] furzegulo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 4 days ago

no, if you don't care about vertical tab bar. also you can apply the betterfox scripts into your librewolf user.js.

[–] kalkulat@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (4 children)

One thing that seems to be missing from most Zen promotion is that Firefox has a huge collection of add-on options/extentions. Hard to beat of you're reliant on several of them. Keeps me from even trying it.

[–] czl@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 4 days ago

Zen supports the add-ons and extensions from FF. (Source: been using it for about a month)

[–] voracitude@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago

Zen is a fork of Firefox, supports Firefox extensions, and retains the built-in access to the Mozilla extension/theme stores from vanilla Firefox. If you go to install an addon, it even gives a popup to "Add to Firefox".

It's a good browser with only minor issues. I'm on Win10; automatic updates don't always succeed, and it seems like it blocks some communication between the 1password desktop app and the browser extension because I have to sign into each separately. Otherwise, I prefer it to Firefox in pretty much every way.

It would be good for them to make sure it's clear that it's a fork of Firefox and supports addons in their marketing! Right now it's quite a ways down the home page.

[–] MonkCanatella@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 days ago

While like other have said, extensions do work, I wouldn't expect zen to prioritize extension compatibility. I've been following development and it seems like a personal project