this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2024
100 points (96.3% liked)

Selfhosted

39893 readers
350 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

These small little handy-dandy devices seem to get more and more popular. Anyone here chipped in for a JetKVM yet? Looks and sounds pretty solid. Are there a lot of you that have aquired a nanoKVM?

top 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] xia@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

We really need to get past the 1080p barrier. AFAICS there is one economical KVM solution for that, and several costly enterprise kits. Surely the actual hardware cost/difference per-unit would be quite small now?

[–] 486@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Why? Even 1080p is more than what is usually needed for such a KVM solution. It is not like this is meant for doing remote work on a computer or anything like that.

[–] xia@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Because sometimes I would rather things be slow than blurry, and my workstation monitor is >1080p.

[–] Schmeckinger@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

You aren't supposed to do serious work over these things. They should be a last resort imo.

[–] recursive_recursion@lemmy.ca 37 points 3 days ago (2 children)

hmm they claim it's open source but their repo:
This organization has no public repositories.

I'd advise against preordering unless you understand and you're ok with taking the leap of faith that is tied with preorders~

They state the code will be released after the first orders ship, which makes a certain kind of sense given this is a competitive space suddenly.

Though, I 10000% agree that there's no reason to take a leap of faith when you can just wait like, uh, a month, and see what they do after release. It's not like they won't still be selling these or something.

[–] Sunny@slrpnk.net 7 points 2 days ago

Hm, good of you to point out. I hope and assume they will post the code for this as soon as they launch this.

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 25 points 2 days ago (2 children)

First project created, only want $50k, delivery is basically as soon as the project ends.

I would be surprised if the backers of this project receive anything.

[–] qupada@fedia.io 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

While I have a personal general rule against backing electronics on Kickstarter and would likely wait for it to be available at retail, I wouldn't necessarily immediately discount this one.

It's probably worth noting - mentioned in Jeff Geerling's video - they had a MOQ of 1500 on the metal case, which likely forced them to be significantly further through the process than a lot of Kickstarters are at launch.

[–] vinnymac@lemmy.world 1 points 15 hours ago

In his article Jeff said:

They add a copper plating, and give it a polished gunmetal grey finish.

Apparently to do all that, they had to order a batch of 5,000 cases, which I hope means they also have a ton of these ready to go.

[–] Sunny@slrpnk.net 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'd be very surprised if this was some sort of sham. At least both Jeff Geerling and Raid Owl have posted about getting these; though like sent to them without them backing them directly.

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'm not saying it's a scam necessarily, but the schedule and budget seem optimistic enough to make me question wether the folks running it have any prior experience with manufacturing.

[–] vinnymac@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago

BuildJet is a YCombinator backed startup with a ton of attention, and a million extra to burn on top of what investors have already given them. They would have to royally fuck this up at this point, most people would be so lucky to have the opportunity they have here.

[–] non_burglar@lemmy.world 14 points 3 days ago

Jeff Geerling and Craft Computing have recently reviewer these units on YouTube and they're fairly optimistic about them.

[–] muzzle@lemm.ee 4 points 2 days ago

I Need a device like this that I can buy through an actual store, as I need to buy them for my office. Do you know any?

It does not even matter if it has ip connection, just usb is fine, but i need to be able to buy it from an "official" source.

[–] lnxtx@feddit.nl 7 points 2 days ago (2 children)

No way it will cost $ 69.

See for example PiKVM prices.

[–] ShortN0te@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 days ago

It is based on completely different hardware. A Raspberry Pi CPU is much more expensive than the CPU that is used here.

[–] navi@lemmy.tespia.org 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

NanoKVM is going for around $50

[–] GameGod@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 days ago

yeah, but it'll be hard to make those Y Combinator vultures rich at that price

[–] femtech@midwest.social 4 points 2 days ago

I backed so I'll see what happens.

[–] deergon@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Yes. I'm excited to try it out :)

[–] ReginaPhalange@lemmy.world -5 points 2 days ago (3 children)

OK, I've read the wiki entry but I still don't understand what KVM is, or why it's needed. The last time I visited a data center - every server rack came with a laptop-esque looking control unit. What problem does KVM comes to solve? What does this invention improve upon a traditional KVM?

[–] ShortN0te@lemmy.ml 12 points 2 days ago

This is not the invention of an IP KVM, those are old. This product just offers the functionality of an IP KVM for very little money.

[–] 486@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

It lets you remotely control a server as if you were sitting in front of a screen and keyboard directly attached to it.

[–] qaz@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Afaik this is for servers without a built-in KVM like e.g. self built servers or repurposed workstations.