this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2024
1363 points (98.4% liked)

Microblog Memes

5670 readers
1812 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 28 points 5 days ago

Many of us see the problem, Mr. Reich. We just feel powerless to do anything about it.

[–] N0body@lemmy.dbzer0.com 117 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Wait until you find out who helped him buy Twitter.

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 45 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Yah, the Saudis own the other half.

[–] tired_n_bored@lemmy.world 11 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Yes the problem is Kamala Harris who once didn't pass the California bar test (which then she passed in a second attempt). She is ineligible! /s

[–] glitch1985@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago

I heard she never even worked at McDonald's! Scandal!

[–] graycube@lemmy.world 94 points 6 days ago (4 children)

Isn't he also an immigrant?

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 64 points 6 days ago

No, he's rich

[–] moriquende@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago

You must be confused - he's white, so the proper term is "expat".

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 9 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Musk was born in Pretoria, South Africa, to Maye (née Haldeman), a model, and Errol Musk, a businessman and engineer. Musk briefly attended the University of Pretoria before immigrating to Canada at the age of 18, acquiring citizenship through his Canadian-born mother.

Yep, and then he moved to the states I assume.

[–] YurkshireLad@lemmy.ca 16 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Canada says sorry, by the way.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] hihi24522@lemm.ee 58 points 6 days ago (2 children)

The state (as defined by Engles, Marx, Lenin, etc.) is the problem. Like this is exactly what it does by definition.

If the government forms an alliance with the market it becomes a slave to the market.

There are more homes than homeless, more food than starving kids. Life saving medicines can be extremely cheap to produce but are sold for fortunes. Everywhere you look, the bourgeoisie are literally holding people’s lives for ransom… and the government does nothing.

In fact the government does less than nothing. It is the government that facilitates the hoarding of these resources. It is the government that enforces patent laws that allow life saving medicines to be kept from those in need. It is the government that enables and legalizes this racketeering by the rich.

When you live in a society where politicians talk equally (or more) about how they’ll help the market as they talk about how they’ll help their citizens—which is what their job is supposed to be—are you really surprised?

Are you really surprised that a government which chooses to let its people go unhoused just to keep the real estate market up is a government in which wealth holds the power? Are you surprised that a government that shuts down worker strikes and forces compromise on the side of the exploited rather than solely on the side of exploitative corporations is a government that can be manipulated by the owner of multiple massive companies?

There is nothing surprising here. The system is working exactly as it is intended to. The problem is not a few members of the bourgeoisie colluding to manipulate the state because that’s how the state always works. The problem is the state.

If you would like to learn more about “the state” I suggest you read State and Revolution. That’s what made me switch from “oh we just need to tax the rich” to “the rich should not exist.” It also is just kind of impressive how Lenin describes many things that are very relevant today despite the fact he wrote this short book over a century ago.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 18 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

To quote myself:

"Not so fun fact: The absolute richest dragons in all of fantasy, excluding Smaug, only have a net worth of several hundred million dollars. A Red Elder Wyrm will have, on average, around 2.5-3 million gold pieces of wealth, with an absolute maximum of 5 million gold pieces. That means that the absolute greediest, and richest type of dragon, by far, only has between 100,000 to 500,000 oz worth of gold.

Smaug being the absolute outlier because he had somewhere between 5 to 10 billion dollars worth of gold.

Now if you are wondering why I'm making a big deal about this, it is because 500,000 oz of gold is only worth about 1.1 billion US dollars. But that is the absolute outlier of the greediest type of dragon that there is. Still only looking at Chaotic Evil Red Elder Wyrms, the average would only be about 3.5 million gold pieces, or a mere 350,000 oz of gold. That's only about $850,000,000 and that is just the most average of the absolute greediest manefestations of greed that our limited minds could imagine. Most dragons would be absolutely fine with between $1,000,000 to $10,000,000. The literal manefestations of greed don't need more than $10,000,000 according to every treasure table.

Those people that have more than 100 million dollars have already passed the greed alignment chart into Chaotic Evil. They are damn near caricatures of dragons at this point."

Marx and Engles saw these "worse than dragons" manifested in their time in the form of Rockefeller and Carnegie. I'm certain that they believed that we would never allow ourselves to be subjegated and stolen to the extent that there would be thousands of individuals whos fortunes would make Rockefeller and Carnegie blush with shame at not being as exploitative as their contemporaries.

[–] OpenStars@piefed.social 4 points 5 days ago

That's a really good illustration but also I wanted to point out that it's not merely some people choosing to be exploitative - though there is no doubt that the likes of Zuckerberg and Bezos and the Musk are that way, ofc - but rather the system being geared to allow or even encourage thus.

e.g. Donald Trump failed at everything he did in life, and according to one analysis would have "made" 8x more money 💰 if he had simply left it in the bank 🤑 untouched by all his various bankruptcies, including somehow casinos that are basically money printers 🖨️.

They played the game sure, but someone made the game, and we all choose to watch it happen and do next to nothing about it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] darthelmet@lemmy.world 61 points 6 days ago

The problem is not seeing a problem with any of that before the bit about talking to spooky foreigners.

The rich and powerful having this much control over our government, communications, and our economic lives in general is THE problem. Full stop. What they decide to do with that power is beside the point. There’s no such thing as a good king.

[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 50 points 6 days ago (2 children)

At this point ... the problem is not the billionaire or the idiots that rise to power ... the problem is everyone everywhere looking at all this and just accepting it all as normal.

I'm not saying we should have a revolution ... everyone should just be more vocal and critical about how they don't accept any of this.

Journalists whether they are under a corporation or not should also stand up more often to either say they don't support this or just refuse to report on all this idiocy without a critical voice.

[–] GuyDudeman@lemmy.world 46 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I'm saying we should have a revolution.

[–] Cruxifux@feddit.nl 16 points 6 days ago
[–] morrowind@lemmy.ml 7 points 6 days ago

The journalists that do don't get the platform of big corporations. It's a systemic issue there as well

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 13 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

you gotta admit its funny as fuck that the us is so greedy its selling itself to one of their biggest rivals rn

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago (14 children)

I guess I don't see the humor in giving a genocidal dictator a military advantage while fighting an offensive war.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Elon Musk doesn't represent the United States. He's just some rich fuck with his fingers in too many pies.

[–] UrPartnerInCrime@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Some of those pies literally being American pie though

[–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago

Hey, if I was the dictator of the United States, he'd be standing trial for treason right about now, but I'm not.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ntma@lemm.ee 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Biden and Harris need to arrest large swaths of the conservative party. Call it a rico charge or whatever. They need to do it before the general public starts rioting and gets out of control.

[–] bamfic@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago (2 children)

They can't because Trump has threatened to do that to them and everyone who supports them. So it would look like revenge.

Of course, his accusing his opponents of being criminal traitors is pure projection. As usual.

[–] NocturnalEngineer@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

They can't do it because a wannabe dictator, who managed to get the supreme court to vote that the president can do whatever the fuck they want as long as its labelled "an official act", whose violent & "enemy within" rhetoric as escalated exponentially in recent months, whose attempted coup failed the last time... They can't do it because it'll look like 'revenge'?

Do you think Trump won't abuse the power of office the moment he's elected again, regardless how he's perceived?

[–] bamfic@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago

Of course he will

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io 21 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Ya know, I DO see a problem with that.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago

i would imagine more wealthy wankers walk with putin on the regular

[–] OpenStars@piefed.social 12 points 6 days ago

img

-conservatives

[–] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 13 points 6 days ago (1 children)

remember back before elon was a outed as a sack of shit and he sent starlinks to ukraine?

turns out russia's got more expertise in the turning people russian dept

[–] draneceusrex@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Eh, he was already kind of a sack of shit even then...was a big SpaceX fan and I watched his decline over the past 10 years in real time.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 10 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Elon wants to hop into politics? I'll vote for him. Elon for Prison 2024.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] IceHouse@lemmy.zip 2 points 4 days ago

I had a problem within 5 words. The Russia scare doesn't make this worse than it already is.

[–] whotookkarl@lemmy.world 10 points 6 days ago (4 children)

Oligarchy and democracy are incompatible

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] TriflingToad@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

and the conspiracy tabloids say nothing.

[–] Prandom_returns@lemm.ee 7 points 6 days ago

Only shows how easy it would be to "Take" the US by someone with at least half a brain.

Luckily, both Trump and Musk aren't the sharpest hoes in the shed.

load more comments
view more: next ›