this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2024
113 points (90.6% liked)

Green Energy

2172 readers
143 users here now

everything about energy production

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I'm all for putting solar panels all over the place, but won't these get dusty and oily and need loads of cleaning after trains pass over?

Also, costing €623,000 over three years sounds rather expensive for just 100m (although that roughly equates to 11KW).

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] eleitl@lemm.ee 14 points 4 days ago

An idiotic idea which will go nowhere just the one about putting PV modules on road surfaces was.

[–] lnxtx@feddit.nl 65 points 5 days ago (7 children)

Jeez, solar freaking railways.

Railways are dirty, brake dust, oil and lube leaking, human waste (from a car toilet if there is no tank).

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 24 points 5 days ago (24 children)

This is Switzerland, not India. Also, it's a test. It's designed to find out exactly how serious those problems are and if they prevent the system from being effective.

[–] Disaster@sh.itjust.works 8 points 5 days ago

Is this the same bunch of people that wanted to make solar roads/bike lanes too?

I could see a solar road working with some kind of passive heating medium circulated underneath but even then, the maintenance on that would be a nightmare. We can barely maintain all the roads we have already, and that's just goopy rocks and grading.

load more comments (23 replies)
[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 18 points 5 days ago (1 children)

They make a better roof over the tracks that the train passes under than being on the ground. They could even be tilted to better face the sun.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] 4am@lemm.ee 9 points 5 days ago

There are “defect detectors” on railways to warn engineers when their train has a chain, air hose, etc dangling and dragging along the ground - which is a potential for accidents of many varieties.

I guess now you can replace that with trains that automatically stop when the Katamari of dislodged solar panels eventually builds enough mass to force a car off the rails.

[–] Mitchie151@lemmy.world 9 points 5 days ago

Surely the maintenance of such problems would be very easy though, given it's already on rails you could run a carriage with washing machinery underneath to clean these occasionally. Interested to see how serious the deterioration over time is due to the grime.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 26 points 5 days ago (1 children)

have we run out of convenient places to put panels? that's news to me, last i checked we still had a hilarious amount of free roof space and stuff like parking lots where we can just slap up the panels.

[–] qupada@fedia.io 13 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Putting a solar roofs over any open-air carpark you happen to own is just a hilariously easier option. Hell, you could erect these OVER the train tracks.

https://greenox-group.de/photovoltaik-carport/ (Article is in German, but it's really more around the picture)

According to a completely un-sourced picture I found online, one carpark (in the USA) is typically around 5.5 x 2.6m, so if you had even 50 carparks on your site you could have ~715 square metres of panels. More, if you figure a way to cover the aisles between the rows of carparks too.

At the top end of all applicable figures (panel efficiency, solar irradiance, inverter efficiency), that could net you ~160kW at solar midday.

Now on the other side, standard-gauge railway is around 1.4m wide, and maybe you could cram a 1m width of panels between the rails.

That sounds like a lot - 1000 square metres per kilometre, and there are thousands of kilometres of railway lines out there - but it's harder to install, harder to service, gets dirty faster, is liable to get damaged, and now you have to figure out how to extract power from somehing a kilometre long, instead of an area that could be a square only around 35m (~115') on a side (for the above 50 carparks).

I know which one of those I'd want to run the cables for.

As has been pointed out many times when this dumb-ass idea comes up, only once you've exhausted every other possibility (carparks, rooftops, putting panels ABOVE roads/rivers/canals/cycleways/railways) and have literally no other viable installation locations, then we can talk.

[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 day ago

solar canopys are actually quite expensive. Needs a very sturdy structure to hold panels high up and deal with wind loads. Solar panels are getting so cheap, that it becomes very reasonable to lay them on the ground instead of optimal angles, higher up.

[–] kokopelli@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago

My dad worked with a guy who is designing a system like this and it makes all the sense.

  1. you shade the parking spaces

  2. you absorb less heat into the ground than tarmac

  3. free energy

  4. direct panel-to-car charging for EVs

[–] ben_dover@lemmy.ml 36 points 5 days ago (8 children)

you have to keep the panels clean in order to work. this is not a great position to do so

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] cron@feddit.org 28 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Why not on the sides of the railroad? Often, there is significant free space on both sides of the track.

[–] CouncilOfFriends@slrpnk.net 12 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

I was about to comment that it makes more sense to put panels in open space, but looking into it does appear some numbers crunchers did the math on efficiency gains from being able to swap old panels with a dedicated machine on the rails, versus the other option.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 22 points 5 days ago

Solar freaking railways

[–] m_f@midwest.social 21 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)
[–] oo1@lemmings.world 13 points 4 days ago (3 children)

i think they'll crack from the vibrations, or to avoid that they'll need to be built a lot sturdier than normal.

In which case just make the cheap version put them on top of buildings, in cities, near to demand; like everyone with a quarter of a brain has known since their invention.

Don't install sensitive/ fragile equiipment in dangerous places near massive energetic machines uness it's neccesay for those machines or there is really no where else to put it.

Can I get 60 grand to shove a solar panel up my arse as an "experiment"? Maybe some of these dumb experiments will help figure out a way to manage all the challenges of idiots who have more money than sense - that might be worth it.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Boomkop3@reddthat.com 4 points 4 days ago

Even if not between the tracks, aside the tracks there is quite a bit of empty space. That space gets a lot less of a hard time from the trains rolling by

[–] perestroika@slrpnk.net 4 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Also, costing €623,000 over three years sounds rather expensive for just 100m

It's hugely expensive, but I expect most of the cost to be in the wagon that lays panels down and picks them up - and could hopefully service a big stretch of railway (if it works). That kind of systems will cost a pretty big penny.

I doubt if this project will "fly", however. A totally horizontal solar panel at ground level is a far cry from producing energy efficiently.

[–] Hirom@beehaw.org 11 points 5 days ago

It seems like it a bad place. It would probably shorten the panels' lifetime, and maintenance would be tricky without interrupting train traffic.

Let's work on putting more solar panels on schools, malls, parking lots, train stations, and any structure with a large roof.

[–] Coreidan@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

What’s the plan for when people start stealing the solar panels? Good luck trying to stop people

The plan is the same for people stealing spikes and rail to sell as scrap: Railroad police don't fuck around.

[–] houseofleft@slrpnk.net 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

A lot of the comments here are, pretty fairly, sceptical of whether this is a viable idea.

My question is, what's the advantage meant to be over just having an electrical railway and seperately some solar panels plugged into the grid? Especially since the article mentions the solar railway would be grid connected?

[–] Successful_Try543@feddit.org 8 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

The 600000 € probably include the development cost. Thus, on a larger scale, the cost per unit length will decrease significantly.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›