this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2024
705 points (96.4% liked)

memes

9971 readers
2797 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
705
Deprecated (lemmy.zip)
submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by dch82@lemmy.zip to c/memes@lemmy.world
top 44 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] weker01@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

That's not the definition of the singularity...

[–] vxx@lemmy.world 2 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

The technological singularity—or simply the singularity[1]—is a hypothetical future point in time at which technological growth becomes uncontrollable and irreversible, resulting in unforeseeable consequences for human civilization.[2][3] According to the most popular version of the singularity hypothesis, I. J. Good's intelligence explosion model of 1965, an upgradable intelligent agent could eventually enter a positive feedback loop of self-improvement cycles, each successive; and more intelligent generation appearing more and more rapidly, causing a rapid increase ("explosion") in intelligence which would ultimately result in a powerful superintelligence, qualitatively far surpassing all human intelligence.[4]

[–] Dozzi92@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago

I feel like the Bobiverse handled this well, in that any super intelligent computer would immediately look at us and desire to fuck right off to outer space.

[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 30 points 1 day ago (1 children)

AI "revolutionizes" everyday life...

You: "AI, how do you make pizza?"

AI: [Said confidently] "Use glue"

[–] bluewing@lemm.ee 1 points 18 hours ago

Well, technically.......Between the crust and cheese.

[–] hazardous_area@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

Also weirdly loss with robots

[–] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 130 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Literally the plot of Wall-E

[–] xenoclast@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The setting. The plot revolves around a robot helping humans trying to rediscover themselves. Just being pedantic

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 31 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I mean, minus the ecological collapse we cause by sucking and being a worthless species

[–] WolfLink@sh.itjust.works 23 points 2 days ago

That part’s real though

[–] dudinax@programming.dev 3 points 2 days ago

They should have just made more trash robots.

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub -2 points 2 days ago

Damn man, doomscrolling hard huh?

[–] Annoyed_Crabby@monyet.cc 8 points 2 days ago

Wall-E or Idiocracy

[–] jpreston2005@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

Oh god, what's in the steaming tray in the last panel?? It's a microwave meal, right?

...RIGHT?

[–] ech@lemm.ee 69 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

A fundamental misunderstanding of what the AI Singularity is, or AI in general.

[–] mindaika@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

This is a Lemmy’s sir

[–] JayDee@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

For those wondering, the AI singularity is a concept in which an AI becomes intelligent enough to improve its own intelligence and does so. The idea is that it continually improves itself over and over until it reaches the highest level of intelligence possible.

It is a potential Deus Ex Machina scenario - a God from a machine.

Edit: to be clear, this is not a scientific idea, it's not really proveable, falsifiable, or even testable in any straightforward fashion. It's mostly a philosophical thought experiment. A hypothetical.

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 16 points 2 days ago (3 children)
[–] CrayonRosary@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

It's not a meme. It's a comic, and a bad one.

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

All the more reason to not take it too seriously

[–] CrayonRosary@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago

I don't take it seriously. I just don't see why people would want to share an unfunny comic based on a complete misunderstanding of what the singularity is.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 16 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] Jiggle_Physics@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

My meme is your mom.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)
[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Whats the difference between an old comic and a current one? Did she retire or get cancelled or something?

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 days ago (2 children)

A comic isn't really a meme. This isn't a comics community

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

I was making a joke about a comic (profession) as it relates to your mother.

[–] lime@feddit.nu 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

a meme is a concept that spreads and mutates. this comic is a spin on the wide-spread idea that AI will surpass humans. hence, this comic is a meme.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 day ago

This comic looks like it fell out of the 90s

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 20 points 2 days ago

This is so wrong for so many reasons

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

headed toward Wall-E world at a slow trot

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 days ago (2 children)

The future is more like Cloud Atlas than Wall-E. This us simply far too optimistic.

[–] TheObviousSolution@lemm.ee 6 points 1 day ago

The problem with dystopias is that they usually focus on taking one line of thought to the extreme while we are moving down multiple ones.

[–] bcgm3@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Now dat's da true-true, I seen it in a viddy

[–] Xanthrax@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

No one will be fat in 2050 unless they're not on ozempic. Every dude will be taking growth hormones. People will work out in a small gym and only go outside when they want to show off their body at the beach or trail. At least, that's my prediction for Socal.

[–] Wanderer@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Tell me more about growth hormones

[–] Xanthrax@lemmy.world 1 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

It's what turned Joe Rogan and Elon Musk into potatoes.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Growth_hormone

It's common for rich men to take that or testosterone to recapture their youth. There's also a good chance they'll travel to turkey and get hair implants.

[–] Wanderer@lemm.ee 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

There is no way they went to Turkey. They rich enough to get it done at home.

[–] Xanthrax@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Fair. But I'd argue they got rich by being cheap, somewhat . They'll come from privilege, but get cheap. I'm a little biased because I live in socal, but rich people like brag to poor people about how they went to a foreign country to get work done. It's supposed to encourage the "grind set." They could've gone here, but mexico or turkey is cheaper, regardless of personal safety or health standards. It's their version of "diversity," but they're just saving money at their own risk. If you NEED work done, go for it. But nah, there's a whole thing here going in socal. I'm not trying to talk about where I live too much, I just think socal is one of the most influential cultural epicenter of the world. Californication.

[–] davidgro@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago

I think predicting the end of money is extremely optimistic.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

Ozempic is cool but it isn't the end-all therapy for weight and weight loss. A more profound control of metabolites, betametabolites, body growth and development gene expression, and general dietary options will be the future for sure, though.

[–] unreachable@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

~~im~~unpossible

[–] OpenStars@discuss.online -4 points 2 days ago

^This

translationi iz 2 dubm ot liev