this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2023
12 points (100.0% liked)

Gaming

4 readers
2 users here now

founded 2 years ago
 

Unity Technologies has stated that PlayStation, Xbox, and Nintendo will pay the company's new runtime fee on behalf of game developers.

top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] WHYAREWEALLCAPS@kbin.social 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Jesus. This is just a circus of incompetence. Doesn't matter who is footing the bill. If you push the bill on the distributor/install service it means those streams will be less likely to embrace indie devs and especially new indie devs without a hit under their belt. So same chilling result.

[–] HarkMahlberg@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Did they not learn from watching Sony delist Cyberpunk after CD Projekt Red told consumers that Sony would give them a refund?

[–] Madison_rogue@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

The answer seems to be no. I'm anticipating Sony, MS, and Nintendo's response on this. Did they even know about it? I'm very curious to see how this pans out because at this viewpoint it seems like an entire shit show.

[–] MJBrune@beehaw.org 11 points 1 year ago

I wonder what work Unity is living in. Must be nice to pretend you could get anyone to just pay whatever fee you make up.

[–] shininghero@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago
[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 7 points 1 year ago

Does Nintendo, Microsoft and Sony know?

[–] conciselyverbose@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I really hope they try this.

Because it would be hilarious to see all the platforms say fuck it and ban Unity games over this ridiculous cash grab they're very obviously not entitled to.

[–] apemint@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

Unity is so ubiquitous that it would have unimaginable consequences.
For example, 90% of vr games are made in Unity. So that's one segment of gaming completely wiped off the map.

Things are not much better in desktop and mobile gaming either, as Unity has close to 50% market share.
It would be a literal Thanos snap.

[–] germanatlas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 year ago

How it will go down:

[–] vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 year ago

yeah the console manufacturers are just gonna say "no, we don't owe you anything, we have never dealt with you before. Sue us"

[–] wolfshadowheart@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

Does this include Valve? I imagine that Valve is a huge part of Unity's sales...

[–] Raji_Lev@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

Man, I hope the lawyers at the Big Three are getting ready to send Christmas cards to Riccitielo cause, uh, he's pretty much going to be signing their paychecks if he keeps going

[–] sirico@feddit.uk 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Makes sense hosting could be standard 25% revenue share 45% if your game is based on unity

[–] ripcord@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I've tried parsing this sentence 3 times and failed. Could someone help out and add/fix whatever words and punctuation are broken here?

[–] derin@lemmy.beru.co 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Makes sense; hosting someone else's game could be a standard 25% revenue share, but then 45% if your game is based on Unity.

[–] ripcord@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago
[–] Itsamelemmy@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 year ago

Devs pay Sony Microsoft etc 25% of the price paid for the game. Unless it's unity, then it's 45%.

[–] sirico@feddit.uk 1 points 1 year ago

se hosting could be standard 25% revenue sha

so sorry man, dyslexic with no knowledge of commas