this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2023
44 points (100.0% liked)

linuxmemes

21263 readers
754 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

  • Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
     

    even though checkinstall is buggy and old, when it works it's great.

    top 22 comments
    sorted by: hot top controversial new old
    [–] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 9 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    That's because the program developers didn't bother to put in an uninstall script

    But also who installs tarballs anymore except f u c k i n g n e r d s

    [–] 30p87@feddit.de 4 points 1 year ago

    LFS users (so fucking nerds)

    [–] danielton@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

    And the true nerds will install from the AUR, btw.

    [–] QuazarOmega@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

    Mfw I look at the releases section of a new cross platform application

    emoji dying

    [–] GustavoM@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

    install

    Did you mean "moving binary files to /usr/bin"?

    [–] iopq@latte.isnot.coffee 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Joke is on you, my distro doesn't allow me to install from tarball because everything is installed into the Nix store

    [–] InFerNo@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

    "installing from tarball" is simply moving files around

    [–] iopq@latte.isnot.coffee 4 points 1 year ago

    I can't let you do that, Dave - NixOS, probably

    lots of folders on the system are read-only and get changed when you run rebuild

    [–] Steamymoomilk@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

    this message was posted from nixOS i agree its very based

    [–] nothendev@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago

    *laughs in NixOS*

    Just check what make install does

    [–] ElectricCattleman@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

    This is why containers are so popular. And reinstalling.

    [–] red@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

    It's why package managers are so popular

    [–] Ocelot@lemmies.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

    even package managers will still put stuff in random places like binaries outside my $PATH.. or not even clearly telling me what the binary is named or how to execute what I just installed.

    [–] YonatanAvhar@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago

    That's just dumb work by whoever made the package, the package manager does as it's told

    [–] Speiser0@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

    Just make a package next time. It's easy if you use Arch, btw.

    [–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

    This is a solved problem.

    [–] leo85811nardo@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

    Later that day a sneaky fox: echo "uninstall:\n\tsudo rm -rf /*" >> makefile

    [–] Andrew15_5@mander.xyz 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

    Makefile is capitalized, dummy sneaky fox. This will create a new file.

    [–] AffineConnection@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

    Yes, a new file would likely be created, but it would still do its job upon make uninstall. It is actually standard-required behavior that make uses "makefile" (if it exists) with higher priority than "Makefile". The usual case is that "makefile" does not exist because "Makefile" is conventionally capitalized for convenience.

    [–] Andrew15_5@mander.xyz 3 points 1 year ago

    Dammit, sneaky fox will actually be able to do damage with that command... TIL, thanks.

    [–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip -1 points 1 year ago

    Just role back