this post was submitted on 09 Oct 2024
514 points (97.9% liked)

Science Memes

11091 readers
915 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] HonoraryMancunian@lemmy.world 78 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] fossilesque@mander.xyz 37 points 1 month ago
[–] criitz@reddthat.com 20 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 36 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Technically you’re not wrong. Mainly because there’s no agreed upon technical definition of what does or doesn’t constitute a tree.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

the definition of tree is literally just something that looks like a tree: a woody trunk with branches.

[–] Yondoza@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

TIL that trees are the same as vegetables and weeds, arbitrary cultural groupings. We should make an arbitrary cultural group name for arbitrary cultural grouped things!

So far the group is: -Trees -Vegetables -Weeds -Pets -Continents -The culinary use of fruit

[–] Robust_Mirror@aussie.zone 5 points 1 month ago

I feel like sports could fit into that pretty well.

[–] Szyler@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)
[–] Yondoza@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I think both of those have rigid scientific definitions.

[–] Szyler@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Oh yeah. I thought you meant how they are used culturally. Because we have many nok-berries with berry in their name.

[–] lugal@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Most won't consider it a tree but who am I to judge

[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Most are wrong then. If you can make toothpicks out of it, it's a tree.

[–] flicker@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago

You can make toothpicks out of anything if you're willing to find a hard bit in it that can be sharpened or whittled.

Holds up a chicken. Behold! A tree!

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

So... Everything is a tree? 🤔

[–] shneancy@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

bones are trees? o_o

[–] flora_explora@beehaw.org 2 points 1 month ago

Nope, that's not how the definition of a tree works. Look at swednek's definition in the comments: it is a woody trunk with branches. There are many other plants you could make toothpicks out of (e.g. that are woody) that aren't trees. For example, shrubs and lianas.

[–] Gladaed@feddit.org 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Because there is no such thing ad a tree. A tree is just a way some plants like to grow.

[–] Vatowine@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

My favorite slightly different perspective today

[–] rickyrigatoni@lemm.ee 4 points 1 month ago

Every lawn would look like a forest if grass were as tall as bamboo. Every forest would look like grasslands if trees were as tall as grass.

[–] ghterve@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Why would she be mad about her partner thinking about other women? Is she insecure?

[–] nathanjent@programming.dev 2 points 1 month ago

He can't see the forest for the grass.

[–] Glitterbomb@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

For me personally it's this damn neighborhood I came across once called Woodfield. Which one is it??! Woods or a field?! I lie awake at night, guys.

[–] Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago

Schrodinger's landscape

[–] TastyWheat@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

She's got a point