this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2023
41 points (97.7% liked)

Formula 1

9068 readers
52 users here now

Welcome to Formula1 @ Lemmy.world Lemmy's largest community for Formula 1 and related racing series


Rules


  1. Be respectful to everyone; drivers, lemmings, redditors etc
  2. No gambling, crypto or NFTs
  3. Spoilers are allowed
  4. Non English articles should include a translation in the comments by deepl.com or similar
  5. Paywalled articles should include at least a brief summary in the comments, the wording of the article should not be altered
  6. Social media posts should be posted as screenshots with a link for those who want to view it
  7. Memes are allowed on Monday only as we all do like a laugh or 2, but don’t want to become formuladank.

Up next


F1 Calendar

2024 Calendar

Location Date
🇺🇸 United States 21-23 Nov
🇶🇦 Qatar 29 Nov-01 Dec
🇦🇪 Abu Dhabi 06-08 Dec

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
all 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jalda@sopuli.xyz 13 points 1 year ago

At this point I think I prefer when Red Bull has a dominant car, so at least we can have a minimum semblance of respect for the rulebook. The minute things don't go their way, and FIA goes full 2021 to favor their golden boy.

This is not inconsistency in decision making. They are 100% consistent when Max is involved.

[–] herc@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't know how I feel about this

[–] BowserDelta@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago (1 children)

To quote Seb, "Well I think it's complete bullshit to be honest 🙄" but that's me sitting here as a casual viewer not stewards knowledge/access.

To me it just feels like another classic inconsistency in decision making.

[–] herc@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Absolutely mate, I think it's a bad call but the stewards have access to more video feeds so we have to trust them.

What I will say is that seargant and Williams was fined EUR5000 for something less egregious

[–] damirK@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Alpha Tauri didn’t show up to the stewards room so got off that one on a technicality.

[–] Sentau@lemmy.one 2 points 1 year ago

Wait what. This is ridiculous. One how can AT just skip a FIA summons without repercussions. Amd two why is max exempt if AT does not report. It's not like AT have filed a complaint and have to be there to justify their complaint. The footage of the impeding is their for all to see. Man all this is bullshit.

[–] herc@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's a fair outcome of that's the case

[–] evanuggetpi@lemmy.nz 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How is that in any way fair? Alpha Tauri, owned by Red Bull, declined to send a representative to the hearing that would have seen Max penalised for impeding. Any other driver would have had a grid drop.

[–] danielfgom@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Exactly. Red Bull jnr had to just drop it in favour of Red Bull Sr. Sucks but what you gonna do? 🤷

[–] ilega_dh@feddit.nl 2 points 1 year ago

The stewards very clearly explain why they did not give a penalty, but still it’s the “FIA golden boy” comments at the top.

Are we forgetting when FIA was called “Ferrari international assistance” because people felt like they were favoring Ferrari all the time?

Stop trying to give meaning to individual decisions. Sometimes things go one way, sometimes the other. It’s not a conspiracy, it’s our goldfish-like memory span.

[–] GeneralEmergency@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

God the amount of salty conspiracy theorists here is depressing.