this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2024
117 points (98.3% liked)

Unixporn

15174 readers
3 users here now

Unixporn

Submit screenshots of all your *NIX desktops, themes, and nifty configurations, or submit anything else that will make themers happy. Maybe a server running on an Amiga, or a Thinkpad signed by Bjarne Stroustrup? Show the world how pretty your computer can be!

Rules

  1. Post On-Topic
  2. No Defaults
  3. Busy Screenshots
  4. Use High-Quality Images
  5. Include a Details Comment
  6. No NSFW
  7. No Racism or use of racist terms

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Why River over Hyprland?

  • Stable
  • Faster
  • Tag system - I was dwm user on x, so it felt comfy.
  • Minimal - I don't like rounded corners or confusing animations

Details

Dots: https://github.com/bitterhalt/dots-river

all 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] houseofleft@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Never heard of river but looks really cool! Come to think of it, I haven't heard or a bunch of this stuff- yazi looks really neat

[–] bthalt@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It is very solid WM. If you have used dwm before, you feel like home. Yazi is like modernized lf/ranger clone written in Rust, it is very fast and comes with sane defaults.

[–] houseofleft@slrpnk.net 1 points 16 hours ago

Yazi sounds ideal! Does river involve as much set up as dwm? I really love the ideas behind suckless tools but they normally involve a lot or set up to configure hoe I like.

[–] GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml 13 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Void is getting some attention recently. Nice.

[–] JetpackJackson@feddit.org 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Ive been thinking about switching to it :3

[–] GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I can only say "good luck". It is not an easy distro. Though if the apps you use are available as flatpaks, you may be fine.

[–] JetpackJackson@feddit.org 4 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Not easy to install or not easy to maintain? Or do you mean like a lack of packages

[–] GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Installation is pretty easy if you choose the Xfce version. The system is stable but many things in it (such as the init system) are unpopular which makes the learning curve very steep. The repo doesn't have that many packages so you have to rely on Flatpak (or Snap but idk if it works on Void) for software support. Hardware support and drivers may be an issue because of that as well.

[–] JetpackJackson@feddit.org 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Ah ok gotcha. My plan was to try dual booting so i still have a working arch system in case something doesn't work. Thanks for the tips!

[–] Hawk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I love Void, but the small repo did make me change to Artix with Runit.

Honestly, Void is pretty straightforward, great distro.

[–] JetpackJackson@feddit.org 1 points 3 days ago

I keep forgetting artix can do runit, I'll have to tinker with that

[–] yrmitz@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

I think Void is much easier to maintain than Arch. And I was on Arch for 4 years. Runit is super simple too.

[–] JetpackJackson@feddit.org 1 points 3 days ago

I'm glad to hear it!

[–] yrmitz@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 days ago

Void has been great. I was using Arch for the last 3-4 years, then I tried Void just out of boredom and found myself liking it so much that I left it as a daily driver.

[–] hellofriend@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Nah man, that's not a river