this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2024
109 points (92.9% liked)

vegan

2622 readers
6 users here now

Please also check out vegantheoryclub.org for a great set of well-run communities for vegan news, cooking, gardening, and art. It is not federated with LW, but it is a nice, cozy, all-in-one space for vegans.


We ask that the you have an understanding on what veganism is before engaging in this community.

If you think you have been banned erroneously, please get in contact with one of the other mods for appeals.

Moderator reports may not federate properly and may delay moderator action. Please DM an active mod if an abusive comment remains after reporting it.


Welcome

Welcome to c/vegan@lemmy.world. Broadly, this community is a place to discuss veganism. Discussion on intersectional topics related to the animal rights movement are also encouraged.

What is Veganism?

'Veganism is a philosophy and way of living which seeks to exclude—as far as is possible and practicable—all forms of exploitation of, and cruelty to, animals ...'

— abridged definition from The Vegan Society

Rules

The rules are subject to change, especially upon community feedback.

  1. Discrimination is not tolerated. This includes speciesism.
  2. Topics not relating to veganism are subject to removal.
  3. Posts are to be as accessible as practicable:
    • pictures of text require alt-text;
    • paywalled articles must have an accessible non-paywalled link;
    • use the original source whenever possible for a news article.
  4. Content warnings are required for triggering content.
  5. Bad-faith carnist rhetoric & anti-veganism are not allowed, as this is not a space to debate the merits of veganism. Anyone is welcome here, however, and so good-faith efforts to ask questions about veganism may be given their own weekly stickied post in the future.
    • before jumping into the community, we encourage you to read examples of common fallacies here.
    • if you're asking questions about veganism, be mindful that the person on the other end is trying to be helpful by answering you and treat them with at least as much respect as they give you.
  6. Posts and comments whose contents – text, images, etc. – are largely created by a generative AI model are subject to removal. We want you to be a part of the vegan community, not a multi-head attention layer running on a server farm.
  7. Misinformation, particularly that which is dangerous or has malicious intent, is subject to removal.

Resources on Veganism

A compilation of many vegan resources/sites in a Google spreadsheet:

Here are some documentaries that are recommended to watch if planning to or have recently become vegan:

Vegan Fediverse

Lemmy: vegantheoryclub.org

Mastodon: veganism.social

Other Vegan Communities

General Vegan Comms

!vegan@vegantheoryclub.org

!vegan@slrpnk.net

Circlejerk Comms

!vegancirclejerk@lemmy.world

!vegancirclejerk@lemmy.vg

Vegan Food / Cooking

!homecooks@vegantheoryclub.org

!veganrecipes@sh.itjust.works

!recipes@vegantheoryclub.org

Attribution

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
109
Recent happenings (lemmy.world)
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by TheTechnician27@lemmy.world to c/vegan@lemmy.world
 

Hi, everyone. A lot has happened here over the last couple days, and I'll try to explain both what has been happening and what I'm doing to hopefully fix some of the damage that's been done. Hopefully these actions can restore even a fraction of the goodwill that we previously had with the wider Lemmy community.

What's happened

Beaver was recently reinstated as a moderator after finding herself at the center of the recent controversy where Lemmy administrator Rooki unjustly and unilaterally interfered with /c/vegan over a discussion surrounding cat food. I was made a moderator after that same controversy when naeva resigned and went to VeganTheoryClub, an instance defederated from Lemmy.World which is designed to be a haven for discussion of vegan food, activism, art, etc. Things were generally cooling down from that over the last week.

A couple days ago, Beaver began posting to /c/vegan with remarkable frequency (~15 posts/day). Not long after, /u/ccunning contacted me asking about why they had been banned for Rule 5, which is our rule against bad-faith arguments against veganism. ccunning is a member of this community, they might even be vegan, and I've never seen them to be anything but mild-mannered and supportive of veganism here. Because I could find no violation, I assumed it was an accident and unbanned them. Very shortly thereafter, ccunning informed me that they had been banned again, and Beaver messaged me in private stating that ccunning had been banned for downvoting vegan comments but encouraging me not to mention that fact publicly. A post on /c/unpopularopinion soon made it apparent that many people were being banned here for this same reason, and taking a look at the mod log, I saw dozens of bans by Beaver whose only stated reason was "Rule 5".

Beaver continued posting and continued banning, and I messaged them asking if the /c/vegan moderators could have a team-wide discussion and vote concerning this interpretation of Rule 5. I made it clear to them that I felt uncomfortable with their behavior and felt it was doing harm to the community. Beaver ignored this request and simply responded to something else I'd said. 12 hours ago, they stickied a post to the top of /c/vegan daring the admins to interfere, a reference to the previous incident involving Rooki.

What's being done

  • Beaver has been removed as a moderator for the community by me with no interference whatsoever from any of the Lemmy.World administrators. I believe her rash, unilateral actions over the last couple of days have done immense damage to the community under the (I believe misguided) pretense that it's effective and disruptive activism. Based on the actions previously summarized, I feel strongly that she cannot presently be trusted to moderate cooperatively, to competently assess what's best for the community, or to be transparent to our users. Although seemingly unlikely at this point, Beaver is encouraged to stay here as a welcome member of the community.
  • Anyone who was banned for downvoting will be unbanned effective immediately. This was completely out of line, and to my understanding, the moderation team was not consulted about this rogue interpretation of Rule 5. Because I don't think you can tie specific comments to a ban, this will be something that could happen over a period of hours while I try to pin down the actual justification for each ban, and anyone currently banned is encouraged to appeal. Rule 5 is still in effect as it has always been, so please continue to participate in good faith.
  • Individual users will temporarily be limited to creating a certain number of posts per day. I'll have to discuss with the rest of the moderation team if they would like this long-term and if so, what a reasonable limit is, but I think this needs to be done at least right now to cool things off. Beaver's extremely frequent posts have completely drowned out posts made by other users and artificially inflated the activity of this community. The two posts stickied by Beaver will be unstickied, but none of her existing posts will be removed.

I was made a moderator here extremely recently, and so I didn't feel comfortable intervening because I felt I'd be overstepping and betraying trust I'd been given. However, I see widespread distrust of Beaver as a moderator even among vegans (myself included) and feel that this is an emergency that I need to put a stop to.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net 39 points 2 months ago

Went off on the deep end.

Anybody who posts 15 times a day in the same community needs to go outside. Even worse is if it's a mod.

[–] rbn@sopuli.xyz 21 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I think that's an adequate reaction. Thank you for taking action and being transparant about it.

As a member of this community for quite some time, the past couple of days felt really weird to me. Instead of peaceful and (from my perspective) valuable communication between vegans and non-vegans, the mood changed to a radical, almost war-like athmosphere. I was not among those being banned but I had several discussions where suddenly loads of other, completely normal posts were deleted.

I think this community should be open for other opinions. Everyone who'd like to engage in a respectful way - vegan or not - should be welcomed. I think the target should be to have a 'pro-vegan community' and not a 'hardline anti everything that is even remotely non-vegan'.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca -4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Was de-modding two other moderators because of paranoid fantasies about a conspiracy part of the adequate reaction?

[–] stormesp@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Cant believe you are a mod here again after crying and insulting your way out lmao.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 19 points 2 months ago

Not a Vegan, but as a mod elsewhere on lemmy.world, I'm often in the modlog, so when I saw all the "Rule 5" bans, well, my spidey sense was tingling. :)

I'm glad you got to the bottom of it and took action.

I was torn on the whole cat food thing, my four kitties will fight you for pepperoni sticks, but my opinion on modding would have been "anyone coming to a Vegan community going 'uhm aktually - cats!' is trolling", same as anyone going into an electric vehicle group going "but what about four stroke internal combustion engines?" would be trolling.

I wish you luck going forward! Modding is a rough gig and not for everyone!

[–] ramble81@lemm.ee 18 points 2 months ago

I’ve been seeing a lot of this as a result of posts making it to all without being subscribed. This feels like a good measured response to restore some semblance of order to the community. I don’t mind seeing the occasional vegan related post as it’s an interesting topic I can occasionally learn something from, but I do agree that the constant posting coupled with the capricious bans put me very close to just blocking the community and moving on with life.

[–] Affidavit@lemm.ee 15 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I think I've reached my limit of drama here. I'm more interested in vegan recipes and vegan news than the clashing of egos between people who just so happen to be vegan. Reckon it's high time to block this community.

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 20 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It should hopefully get better from here, and this should hopefully be the last drama post. Vegan news and recipes will be back very shortly, but it's understandable if you don't trust that after this.

[–] jelloeater85@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago (4 children)

I definitely like the food you folks come up with, vegetarian myself.

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 18 points 2 months ago

In fact, if you read this post backwards, you'll see a recipe for a really ripping lentil soup.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Which reminds me, I need to eat. BRB making 10 minute farro just for you guys. :)

https://traderjoesrants.com/2022/04/20/trader-joes-10-minute-farro-whole-grain/

+ dried cranberries, not sure if those are technically vegan or not. I hear spiders are all over cranberry bogs.

https://indie88.com/bog-spiders/

(2/4 kitties loved the farro, not down with the cranberries.)

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

plus dried cranberries

Excuse me? You can't just open up my world to the flavor combination of "nutty and tart" without giving me time to prepare.

(That sounds amazing)

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Nutty and tart and a little bit sweet... but I put dried cranberries on/in everything. Dried black currants too!

(Non-Vegan) Banana Bread (1/2 stick of butter, 1 egg):

[–] Affidavit@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I've been humming and harring about whether to block this community over the past week, but the sheer orangeness of your post has me convinced. Orange is the best.

I will remain for now.

Edit: do you usually keep your salt and pepper shakers on the stove???

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

They're both grinders and it really depends on what I'm doing. If its for a finished meal, yeah, but if I need volume for a recipe? No.

Family photo, the pot in the middle is my grandmothers from the 1950s, I inherited it from her and built out the rest when I discovered we had an outlet store. :)

[–] toasteecup@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Anything eater here, fucking love some vegan recipes.

[–] 5714@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 2 months ago

Blocked Beaver for myself for spamming just hours ago too. I knew all the low quality vegan memes already and many of them are overly self-boasting. Veganism is not for humans first.

Years of watching Ed Winters taught me that overly angry arguments will not be understood or reflected through the filter of rage. Confrontation as a means for civil reflection (ie Asking Questions) works, but one has to know how. Beaver did not.

[–] Blaze@sopuli.xyz 12 points 2 months ago

Interesting course of events

[–] Rose@lemmy.zip 11 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Though I never would have thought to do this in my community, I don't think it's unacceptable to ban people over voting behaviors if there is good evidence of brigading or persistence, however, using that specific rule to justify it is a bit of a stretch. It would help to see Beaver's explanation and what the rest of the moderators make of the events.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca -4 points 2 months ago

When I shared what I thought of events as one of those moderators, I was de-modded. It's clear what is really happening here.

[–] JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago

From the write-up, this looks like another example in microcosm of the Anglosphere's culture clash over the issue of speech. Namely, openness vs censoriousness, or safety vs harm, depending on one's point of view - and probably generation.

I am not (quite) vegan but since I seem to spend my time defending vegans I thought I'd try hanging out with a few and perhaps even sharing polite tips on how to be more convincing with omnivores. Risky plan! But I have not yet been canceled. Seems like that is partly to your credit. So thanks for being so thoughtful and open-minded, it really reflects well on this community.

[–] YarrMatey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 months ago

Holy shit. Well, I hope the community can move forward from this.

[–] ResoluteCatnap@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 months ago

Posting just to see if i was banned for being critical in that other thread. But yeah i also moved to that other instance.

Glad to hear some of you are trying to clean things up so this community isn't the laughing stock lemmy though. I mean it, thank you.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 months ago

In light of rising tempers and what I consider emotional abuses of power against fellow moderators, I am going to take a break from this thread.

[–] geography082@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago

Vegan drama! Would you fight with Branches of trees?

[–] veganpizza69@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I don't appreciate the policy of enforcing reversion to mediocrity, as if we're supposed to tolerate the influx of confused and ignorant users who stumble upon some post on the main page.

The same dynamic happens with ®️/all and it's pain in the ass there too.

The Lemmy platform requires a lot more features, either as sorting the lists of posts with better algorithms, or tools to block the "drive-by hater" phenomenon. There should be no apologies.

[–] lalo@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 month ago

There's already a scaled sort, that will boost the ranking of communities you follow ;). I hated (not) seeing downvoted posts on vegan communities.

[–] phoneymouse@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Thanks for taking care of that

load more comments
view more: next ›