Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
its about time people that dont secure their human killing devices be prosecuted when those devices are ultimately used to kill humans.
lets hope this is repeated every time we have to pay the 2nd amendment tax with dead childen.
It wasn't that he didn't secure the gun. It's that he gifted it to the teen directly.
does it matter? no it does not.
if you dont secure your human killing devices, and it ends up with dead/hurt humans you should be prosecuted.
e. and honestly, he absolutely failed to secure the device he was responsible for. the method he used is superfluous
It does matter. The teenager was the owner. Even if the gun was secure it would have been accessible to the teenager. The gun was gifted to the teenager and that is the problem. The teenager should not have position of a fire arm, that we both agree on. Stating that the gun should have been secure completely ignores the actual scenario here.
Oh bullshit. I bought my son a rifle when he was a minor. You know where "his" rifle was when we weren't actually using it? Locked up in my fucking gun safe.
Was the teenager the owner? Can a 14 year old legally possess a firearm like that independent of their parent(s)?
I always imagined it was similar to when a parent buys a car and “gifts” it to the child. The car still belongs to the parent, at least until the kid is old enough to take ownership of it.
It remained unclear how the shooter obtained the weapon.
id put money on the fact that teen did not buy an AR. The human killing remains the responsibility of the purchaser.
had the gift been to another adult, you might have an argument.
you should in absolutely no capacity be able to gift an AR to a 14 year old and claim no responsibility.
But that's why the father is being prosecuted. Because he ultimately gifted the firearm to his teenager. Your original statement was about unsecured firearms. I was pointing out this is not a case of "teenager breaks into house and gets a gun." This is about a father letting their 14 year old have a gun.
This is about a father letting their 14 year old have a gun.
this is a failure to secure
Afaik there is no state where an underage person is allowed to handle assault style fully automatic weapons without the supervision of a parent or legal guardian. So even if it is his gun, it falls under parental supervision until 18 years old.
Semi automatic or hunting rifle is a little more murky.
Anyway I think that your comment nailed it - a person under 18 was able to obtain and handle a gun without supervision is a failure to secure.
The gun was not full auto.
No it is not.
Thankfully he wasn't able to get a hold of any library books with a gay character.
As a Pro Life Republican trying to Protect The Children this is HORRIBLE! This INFRINGES on his Second Amendment RIGHTS!
Harder and harder to know when it’s implied these days. Is there a /s involved here?
Of course there's a /s.
Even for oblivious republicans, their comment history is on point.
Fucking good. It’s mostly this assholes fault giving this particular kid a gun.
Lol imagine going to jail cause of your kid
After beinv convicted, I want a Barbara Walters's style interview with him crying and begging for leniency. Play that shit on a loop after every NRA commercial, convention, interview etc. Make people understand this is shit and needs to change.
Finally, we are doing something about gun violence by arresting 1 or 2 extra people after it happens. Hurray.