this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2024
12 points (100.0% liked)

literature.cafe chat

376 readers
1 users here now

Local off topic chat for literature.cafe, any and all are welcome. For discussions of books and beyond! Please follow instance rules. Although focused for literature.cafe users, any and all are welcome!

To find more communities on this instance, go to: !411@literature.cafe

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CaptObvious 4 points 2 weeks ago

I wasn’t aware that they’re now a nonprofit. What do they spend money on?

Do a thing because it’s the right thing to do. Or don’t. But using -isms to justify a controversial position makes my teeth hurt.

[–] Uncle_Abbie 2 points 1 week ago

They're kind of vague on what they mean when they say "AI." Are they asking a chatbot for a synonym, or feeding it a prompt and sitting back while it creates a manuscript from whole cloth?

Either way, it's none of my business. There's no prize to be won, the gains are all personal. For the first in my life, my teacher's words ring true: "You're only cheating yourself."

[–] alex@jlai.lu 1 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah idk, I feel like last year's statement was good and if they said something more... questionable this year, probably some people were just being really pushy about "please shit on AI". As far as I'm concerned everyone looks pretty bad here.