Rad. Keep voting for free market, deregulation policies. What's the worst that could happen to your land and livelihood?
this post was submitted on 31 Aug 2024
61 points (100.0% liked)
New York Times gift articles
558 readers
32 users here now
Share your New York Times gift articles links here.
Rules:
- Only post New York Times gift article links.
Info:
- The NYT Open Team. (2021-06-23). “A New Way to Share New York Times Stories”. open.nytimes.com.
- “Gift Articles for New York Times Subscribers”. (n.d.). help.nytimes.com.
Tip:
- Google "unlocked_article_code" and limit search results to the past week.
- Mastodon: Use control-F or ⌘-F to search this page. (ref)
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Hard to have any sympathy for anyone when the problem is one caused by their own voting choices when an alternative exist and they refuse it.
Feels good to blame victims at a distance, doesn’t it
They aren't victims. That's my point.
I'm sure it fells good for you to feel that they are and that you're out there defending them.
I don’t know any American farmers, but I suspect they have limited options of who to vote for, and even when they diligently vote correctly at every opportunity, their candidates are incentivized to betray them the moment they take office. The more important truth, however, is this:
When some misfortune befalls your fellow man, this instinct to bury pity with contempt hurts you more than it hurts them.
I live around a ton of farmers. They all vote the same.
Still I’m inclined to feel for them, the way I felt for people in the UK during Brexit, Canadians when their labor rights are eroded, Russians when their government rigs their elections and media, Chinese when their government persecutes them, and so forth.
I suspect it’s often not a majority of citizens pushing through these harmful policies. Even when it is, I blame lack of education and larger hostile actors who wage war against the masses with misinformation campaigns, election interference, etc.
The point is not that people themselves are entirely free of blame. It’s that human suffering always merits sympathy, and looking for reasons to disregard or rejoice in their just desserts isn’t a helpful impulse.
Good point
🫂
Lack of sympathy is not a form of contempt. Lack of sympathy is form of apathy. Contempt cannot exist where there is apathy.
Your ignorance and suspicions are yours alone and do not transferable to me.
It's silly and weird for you to make up this story in your head about me and then attack that imagined person.
problem is one caused by their own voting choices
Blame. Contempt. Not attacking. Showing you your self.
Holding someone accountable for their choices isn't blaming them nor is it attacking them.
Us
Spongebob was right, in the future everything is ~~chrome~~ plastic