opponents argue the new policy will limit researchers’ ability to maintain control of their published work
From what I understand, researchers already aren't able to maintain control of their published work because of the publishers.
For talk of all things related to libraries!
Please follow this instances rules.
opponents argue the new policy will limit researchers’ ability to maintain control of their published work
From what I understand, researchers already aren't able to maintain control of their published work because of the publishers.
Typically your work belongs to the person who pays you for it. So it seems to me that if it's paid for by the public, then it's owned by the public.
The whole article's worth reading.
Currently, the academic publishing industry’s business model relies largely on an author’s willingness to submit work for free—or even pay to publish it—and the publisher’s ability to turn around and sell that research to academic libraries through expensive journal subscriptions. Libraries at doctoral-granting institutions spend about 80 percent of their materials budgets on such subscriptions ...
Sounds like an industry that doesn't deserve to exist.
Oh nooooooo. Anyways...