this post was submitted on 14 Sep 2023
303 points (98.1% liked)

News

30859 readers
2846 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 018118055@sopuli.xyz 61 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Crash the housing market to save the office building market

[–] Wrench@lemmy.world 23 points 2 years ago (5 children)

The housing market needs to crash. Prices nationwide are insane. Bubble needs to pop

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Badass_panda@lemmy.world 17 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I'm OK with that, the housing market is in a giant bubble and it needs to crash. I say that as someone who bought a house at the lowest price point right at the start of the pandemic, combined with an incredibly low interest rate. Theoretically my home is worth almost 50% more now, 4 years later.

Thaaaaat's a bubble.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] GillyGumbo@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago

tbf, this is probably suburban / rural areas to move back into urban areas that are already having crises. Won't fix any of the housing markets in high population centers.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 46 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (8 children)

"My sellers both work at the same company, which told them they have to be in the office three days a week or they'll lose their jobs. They have six months to make the move. They'll probably have to take a $100,000 loss on their home," Pendleton said.

Pretty sure I would rent out the home instead of taking a $100,000 loss? Rent something to live in where you're moving to until it's more favorable to sell.

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 64 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Six months is plenty of time to find a new job these days.

[–] n2burns@lemmy.ca 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

In a lot of these WFH communities, the rental market softened with the rest of the housing market, so you might not have renters or have to take a hit on the rent. Also, being a landlord more than a commute-able distance away from your property sounds like asking for trouble, unless you hire a property manager, but that's another hit to your income.

[–] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 5 points 2 years ago

Even if the market in some of these more remote areas softened a bit, I think taking a $100,000 hit over one year is crazy, though. Even if you lose $100 or $200 per month renting it out, that's a long ways from $100,000. Meanwhile, you're paying off the mortgage and building equity.

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 8 points 2 years ago

Yeah, that's nuts. Also, as a couple you both probably shouldn't be working for the same company from a risk reduction POV.

[–] Clent@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Rent to own is also an option.

That assumes you can get a back to ground be you two mortgages though.

This is an excellent opportunity for corporations to buy up homes.

The rich will only get richer until we stand up.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 41 points 2 years ago (1 children)

After seeing the headline, I thought it would be people moving farther away to be outside of the RTO radius. Instead its people moving closer to work because they are cities/states away with WFH.

[–] Odelay42@lemmy.world 22 points 2 years ago (1 children)

A lot of companies (Amazon) don't have a radius. It's RTO or nothing.

[–] yyyesss@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago

nothing it is, then

[–] krellor@kbin.social 36 points 2 years ago (6 children)

I know lots of companies are handling the wfh and return to office situation poorly. But to provide a counterpoint, at the start of covid, I led all the engineering teams in a large organization with dozens of sites. When we went to wfh we made it clear that we were authorizing remote work with the contingent that the team could be called in as needed, not to move outside of the area, and not to travel more than two hours away when on call (1 week every two months) etc. Sometimes things break bad enough you need the team's to be physically present at a location, or doing major border device work, etc.

Either the organizations didn't message properly, or a lot of people moved despite being told that the wfh wasn't a permanent remote work accommodation. I'm all for remote work and hybrid, etc, but on a personal level buying a house outside your commute range while knowing you might get called in someday and being brown to your job... just poor decision making.

Fwiw, I approved permanent remote with for all my staff who didn't have any physical responsibilities. For those whose jobs involved any physical infrastructure, the best a could do was hybrid with no minimum number of days in office, just come in as required for the work.

[–] n2burns@lemmy.ca 39 points 2 years ago

Either the organizations didn’t message properly, or a lot of people moved despite being told that the wfh wasn’t a permanent remote work accommodation.

A lot of employers straight up lied. In some situations, management said employees would be permanent WFH but they didn't have that authority. In other situations, employers changed their mind and the employees have no recourse other than trying to call the employers bluff.

[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 26 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yours is a sane and reasonable approach. Sometimes you need to drive down to the datacenter and push a button, or there's special equipment you need that is cheaper to have in one place. These jobs should be in person when necessary.

Pushing people to commute outside of this framework puts unnecessary strain on transportation networks and useless emissions in the environment.

[–] 0110010001100010@lemmy.world 19 points 2 years ago

At my previous role, I ALWAYS wanted to be onsite at the datacenter if I was doing upgrades of critical systems. I'd sit in the lobby where it was quiet instead of on the datacenter floor but there was comfort knowing that if a button needed pushed I didn't have to drive 30 minutes to do it.

[–] Wrench@lemmy.world 18 points 2 years ago

They definitely moved with the intent to be fired if called on-site permanently again. There were tons of comments to that degree during that time (and now).

Essentially, there's more than enough demand for tech skills. They can easily find another job that allows WFH.

It's fair. Shitty to honest managers trying to accommodate where plausible, but honestly, tiny violin vibes there.

[–] Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

That wasn't poor decision making. That was knowing their worth. They knew if the company demanded a return to office they could simply continue working remote for a different company, likely with an increase in pay. Only a fool would alter their life plans for some company that might require RTO. Now they're enjoying improved quality of life while living where they prefer.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world 29 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I told my boss the other day my upper limit for in office time is one a week. We were 3 days a week before COVID, 0 during COVID, 1 a month after COVID, and just this month they upped it to twice a month.

Hell, if I stopped coming in at all right now there is no way in hell they'd fire me anyway. We have too much stuff to do and not enough time to do it. I know people think that but we've got contractual obligations to fill and new regulations to follow. It'd cost them way more to fire me and miss those deadlines waiting for new hires to get up to speed.

[–] madcaesar@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Dude, just don't go. If you're doing your job from home, why are they asking you to burn fuel and your time on earth sitting in fucking traffic???

[–] alienanimals@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

If more people stood up for themselves, we wouldn't have this problem in the first place.

[–] Gerbler@lemmy.ml 12 points 2 years ago

If only more workers could stand up for themselves in unison. Like some united front. But what could we call it?

[–] solstice@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago

It would be a lot easier to sell RTO if rent weren't outrageously high anywhere near a downtown central business district. I prefer office personally and don't mind a 20 minute commute or so but any more than that is a real drag. It's real hard for me to tell someone to fight an hour and a half of rush hour traffic just to get to the office and be harassed for 8-12 hours and then do it all again at night.

load more comments
view more: next ›