this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2024
186 points (98.4% liked)

News

23367 readers
3328 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.

2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.

3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.

4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.

5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.

6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.

7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.

8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.

9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.

10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
rjc@lemmy.world
Thekingoflorda@lemmy.world
Tenthrow@lemmy.world
JonsJava@lemmy.world
gedaliyah@lemmy.world
little_cow@lemmy.world
jeffw@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
186
Nebraska Reverts to 19th-Century Voting Restrictions, Clouding Rights for Thousands (boltsmag.org)
submitted 2 months ago by gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
8 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

The Nebraska Voting Rights Restoration Coalition was ready for July 19. A new state law, Legislative Bill 20, would take effect that day, instantly granting voting rights to some 7,000 people with past felony convictions.

...

[But] two Republican elected officials in Nebraska—Attorney General Mike Hilgers and Secretary of State Bob Evnen—halted implementation of the new law, shutting down new registrations for people with past felonies and throwing into question the voting rights of tens of thousands of other Nebraskans who, until last month, were legally, unambiguously eligible to vote.

...

On July 17, less than 48 hours before LB 20 was to take effect, Hilgers issued an advisory opinion stating that the new law was unconstitutional. But Hilgers didn’t stop there; he also declared unconstitutional a 2005 reform law ending lifetime disenfranchisement of anyone convicted of any felony; the 2005 law, Legislative Bill 53, allowed Nebraskans to vote two years after completing their sentences, a waiting period that LB 20 was set to eliminate.

Archived at https://web.archive.org/web/20240828114456/https://boltsmag.org/nebraska-voting-rights-restoration/

top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 59 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I've had it up to here with these fucking activist judges who think they can unilaterally rewrite laws.

[–] Labtec6@lemmy.world 33 points 2 months ago

True, but in this case, it was an AG's opinion (that doesn't hold legal weight) and another Republican who just use that as a legal argument to not do something that both parties agreed to. Even the previous Republican AG for Nebraska says this issue is stupid and LB 20 should go ahead.

[–] Buelldozer@lemmy.today 15 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The Nebraska State Supreme Court is going to bitch slap this so hard that it lands in Sioux City, Iowa.

[–] phdepressed@sh.itjust.works 19 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Doesn't matter if the outcome is after registration deadlines.

[–] Buelldozer@lemmy.today 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

The NSSC already took the case and the Registration Deadline is October 11th. There's plenty of time for them to make a ruling.

[–] Buelldozer@lemmy.today 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Good News...it's done. They also extended the registration deadline to October 25th so that people impacted by the decision can still vote.

https://www.publicnewsservice.org/2024-10-21/social-justice/court-clears-way-for-nebraskans-with-past-felony-convictions-to-register-vote/a93050-1

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 2 months ago

Wouldn't want the people to have their pesky say in how we do things 'round here. /s