this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2024
35 points (67.7% liked)

Today I Learned

17813 readers
347 users here now

What did you learn today? Share it with us!

We learn something new every day. This is a community dedicated to informing each other and helping to spread knowledge.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must begin with TIL. Linking to a source of info is optional, but highly recommended as it helps to spark discussion.

** Posts must be about an actual fact that you have learned, but it doesn't matter if you learned it today. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.**



Rule 2- Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding non-TIL posts.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-TIL posts using the [META] tag on your post title.



Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.

If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.

For further explanation, clarification and feedback about this rule, you may follow this link.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.

Unless included in our Whitelist for Bots, your bot will not be allowed to participate in this community. To have your bot whitelisted, please contact the moderators for a short review.



Partnered Communities

You can view our partnered communities list by following this link. To partner with our community and be included, you are free to message the moderators or comment on a pinned post.

Community Moderation

For inquiry on becoming a moderator of this community, you may comment on the pinned post of the time, or simply shoot a message to the current moderators.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] hendrik@palaver.p3x.de 92 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Yeah, Homeopathy is pseudoscience and a lot of diluting and banging things on a table and false claims. The placebo effect is proper science.

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 61 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Fun fact, Samuel Hahnemann was a pioneer in medical research. He was absolutely a quack, but in the absence of actual knowledge and understanding of physiology, his methods were at least rigorous. At the time, the practice of bloodletting was common, and he accurately decried the practice as doing more harm than good.

In his efforts to advance medical knowledge, the guy would ingest known poisons in small quantities and document how it made him feel. "This upsets my stomach, it must be good for indigestion, that one makes me cough, so it must be good for tuberculosis." He was willing to injure himself to learn medicine. He also poisoned his colleagues, students, and healthy test subjects to further his research without killing himself.

The concept that like treats like was revolutionary. It was completely wrong, but it was not entirely irrational and it led to several important discoveries. The most famous example of a homeopathic success story is nitroglycerin. It causes heart palpitations, and has been one of the most successful heart attack interventions ever discovered.

Of course, we now have the scientific method, medical ethics, informed consent, and a much clearer understanding of human physiology and biology. We now know that homeopathy is crap. Even wt the time, dilution and succussion were entirely irrational, and anyone selling homeopathic remedies today ought to be charged with fraud. But still, it's an interesting bit of medical and scientific history that most people dismiss entirely.

[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 22 points 2 months ago

People think a lot of things

[–] Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz 20 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Placebos only work if the people think they'll work. Funnily enough, it is possible to be aware something is a placebo and still expect it to work, but generally placebos involve some deception where the person thinks they're receiving real treatment.

So yes, people selling homeopathic remedies are going to claim they're real treatments, both to convince people to buy them, and because they'll be most effective if people think they're real. And the people buying them will also be the people who believe they're actually effective, causing them to actually have an effect.

[–] hsdkfr734r@feddit.nl 25 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Placebos only work if the people think they'll work. Funnily enough, it is possible to be aware something is a placebo and still expect it to work,

Even if you know that it is a placebo, it still works. https://hms.harvard.edu/news/placebos-work-even-without-deception

I don't know if you have to believe in the placebo effect for it to have an effect. :)

Homeopathy... do the sugar balls have a better effect if they are very expensive? Who knows.

[–] Ephera@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, it would be a fine thing to sell to people, given that:

  • they don't charge ridiculous prices for it, and
  • they never claim to be a treatment for any ailment that actually needs real treatment.
[–] Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz 3 points 2 months ago

Yeah, not saying it's not scummy business. It probably can be a decent treatment for non-serious conditions if the placebo effect gives the patient relief, but any serious condition will need real treatment.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (2 children)

but generally placebos involve some deception where the person thinks they’re receiving real treatment.

That's literally what a placebo is...

Being aware that the placebo effect exists, and even being aware that someone is about to hand you something that may or may not be a placebo still doesn't effect the chances of a placebo effect.

Like....

Do you think when placebos are used in studies that the patients aren't aware that they may get an inactive treatment?

They literally have to sign contracts acknowledging that they're aware of that fact in every medicinal trial...

Why doors such blatantly wrong information keep getting upvoted on Lemmy?

This is far from the first time I've seen this happen.

[–] Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz 3 points 2 months ago

People know that they can get a placebo treatment, but they don't know if they actually got a placebo or the real treatment. They're also generally hoping both that they got the real treatment, and that the real treatment will make things better.

Maybe calling it deception isn't fully accurate, but the the point is that they're given something they hope is medicine, but in reality it's the placebo treatment.

[–] tomi000@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I think you misunderstood what you are replying to. Also you misunderstood the placebo effect (or maybe you think 50/50 placebo control group studies are the only application)

[–] vermyndax@lemmy.world 17 points 2 months ago

My father and stepmother were full tilt into this quackery. Today they don't talk about it as much, but they do talk about politics an awful lot. I'll let you figure out where they fall on the political spectrum.

[–] Moobythegoldensock@lemm.ee 13 points 2 months ago

It’s placebo in any practical sense. As mixtures become more dilute they essentially become pure water: anything over 23 dilutions becomes statistically unlikely to have even a single atom of the original substance in it at all. And the trials on it are indistinguishable from placebo.

[–] Carighan@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago

Yeah well, that's how the grift gets you. You know what a purely placebo sugar pill is called that everyone agrees is a placebo? Well... a placebo!

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago

Here is the required YouTube link for every thread about homeopathy: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HMGIbOGu8q0

[–] Red_October@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

"People think there is a non placebo effect." Of course "people" do, the same people who think homeopathy works. They are wrong. Full stop, wrong.

[–] Tehdastehdas@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Funny thing, hormesis is what homeopathy was looking for: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hormesis

Did someone found hormeopathy?

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

We dont think theres a "non placebo effect"

We know there's a nocebo effect. Which is the opposite of placebo, meaning you can have a negative effective from something that's inactive.

The real crazy part is if before an experiment to measure the effects, explaining the nocebo effect pretty much elimates it. Explaining the placebo effect doesn't change the results.

Meaning we have a fundamental disposition to being optimists.

[–] Skua@kbin.earth 5 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I think you're misunderstanding the title. It's saying that homeopathists believe that homeopathy has an effect beyond the placebo effect

[–] nickwitha_k@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 2 months ago

They can believe all they want. Legitimate medicine requires evidence.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

Yep, that happened.

Thanks for clearing it up

[–] tobogganablaze@lemmus.org 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

~~Your link does not contain a source for your title~~ fixed

[–] RmDebArc_5@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago

My bad, fixed it. I learned it from the Wikipedia article, and when looking for the link I just copied the first link with wiki but that was wiktionary not Wikipedia

[–] Jean_le_Flambeur@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I envy you. Had to discuss with esos way to much

[–] Demdaru@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

I am so conflicted on this. My partner, as a child, had bad case of asthma. She went to normal doctor...which almost killed her by being overzealos with antibiotics (That doc also almost killed my best friend...). Her mother, a proper believer that natural healing is the way to go, took her then to a homeopath.

And it worked.

It bloody worked. Shit backed off enough that she's having a normal life. Granted, that homeopath also had doctorate in medicine and was long time practicing doctor, but shit.

Edit: Note to self, people dislike even actual real histories because homeopathy bad. Heh.

[–] Bacano@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I read somewhere that one of the effects is abstention from treatment. Essentially the idea that, sometimes, to do nothing is better than blasting the body with macro doses of foreign chemicals. This seems to be the case here.

[–] hex@programming.dev 1 points 2 months ago

Yeah, i imagine it really depends on the case and the person.