this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2023
69 points (86.3% liked)

World News

32296 readers
861 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] gosling@lemmy.world 40 points 1 year ago

Elon is a genius! He removed the bird, symbolizing the loss of freedom for its user and his company's inability to soar to great heights.

The bird leaving indicates an impeding catastrophe about to hit his company and the new symbol "X" is just as clever, because that's the sign people will click on when they go uninstall the app. Soon, the relationship between Twitter and its users will be nonexistent, just like Musk and his "X" wives

[–] taylus@lemmy.ml 33 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I’m so glad we got this instead of solving global warming

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Ennuigo@lemm.ee 32 points 1 year ago (5 children)

What is with this guy and his hardon for adding “X” to everything? He’s like a teenager that thinks that adding flame decals to anything makes them “cooler”.

[–] masquenox@lemmy.ml 23 points 1 year ago

It's halfway to a swastika.

[–] instamat@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

He’s obsessed with it. His version of PayPal before he merged with the company that became PayPal was x.com and everyone hated it.

[–] ech@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Teslax - Ask your pharmacist today what Teslax can do for you.

[–] Default_Defect@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Teslax gives you erectile dysfunction.

[–] SturgiesYrFase@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

May give you erectile dysfunction....in about 98% of cases.

[–] glacier@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 1 year ago

The x stands for xtremely shitty.

[–] Hextic@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Literally stuck in the 90s.

[–] airdi1@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Musk think the problem is the logo. Only if he knew, the logo is fine it is him that people dont like.

[–] Rhaedas@kbin.social 19 points 1 year ago (10 children)

The logo has been very successful in branding the company, as well as the companion verb "tweet". I think a company has reached peak when its name or something connected is used as an action verb. If he had taken over McDs he'd be tossing out the arches and even Big Mac with claims that they are the problem.

Twitter may have not been in great shape financially when he took over, but at least it had somewhat of an image. Musk is the contractor you called to fix a leak in the roof, and he burns the house down. He fixed the leak alright.

[–] blivet@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes, the name of the company, the logo, and the idea of “tweets” are all a charming evocation of a world filled with brief messages. Twitter has problems, but branding isn’t one of them.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] root@socialmedia.fail 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Twitter was doing fine financially before Musk bought it. He paid more than twice what it was worth and he used loans to do it, that's what this is all about.

[–] atomWood@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Twitter has never really been a financially viable company. They were losing money year after year. That’s not what I would call financially stable. There’s a reason they did everything they could to force Musk to buy it when he tried to back out.

[–] root@socialmedia.fail 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yeah there is a reason, the reason is because his dumbass offered more than twice what the company was worth.

Lots of tech companies operate at slightly under profitability. They were doing fine.

[–] UnverifiedAPK@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

Twitter was doing fine financially before Musk bought it.

No it wasn't 😂

He just lit a sinking ship on fire, yes it's worse but it was bad before too.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] sensibilidades@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What's the new word for microblogging on X corp? "Musk x-ed this morning that ..."

Funny, because "x-ing out" is what I do whenever I accidentally click on a twitter link nowadays!

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] matthewmercury@reddthat.com 3 points 1 year ago

If he wants to get rid of the bird why is he changing the name to Eggs?

[–] Gregorech@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

He wants to replace it with an X, an x with bent arms in a nice red and white background people will love that it'll just pop.

[–] Aurix@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Many social apps use blue. Having your suggested colour applied would make sure Twitter is supremely above the others.

[–] Gregorech@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

He needs to buy Uber next....

[–] Jmr@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

X Transport

[–] oxjox@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I've been using a moniker containing two Xs for over two decades. Speaking on behalf of my early-20s self, how fucking edgy do you believe yourself to be as one of the world's richest persons embracing a single letter as the epitome of logos to represent your umbrella corporation? Hire a branding team, you pathetically dull gen-x neckbeard edgelord manchild.

Seriously, the '90s called a they want their X back.

[–] xSPYXEx@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Elon is the kind of guy who picked a goofy xbox gamertag when he was a kid and never stopped using it. I wouldn't know.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HolidayGreed@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Just wait until he comes after you for infringing on his trademark 😬

The alphabet will never be the same again. Sesame Street better lawyer up.

[–] Simulation6@sopuli.xyz 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Do we need to stop calling them tweets then?

[–] Akasazh@feddit.nl 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The new word will be 'twats', after it's owner

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Years ago I used the word "twat" around my girlfriend and she said "you're pronouncing that wrong". WTF? I thought she was going to tell me to pronounce it like the English do ("twatt" instead of "twott") but she said it was actually pronounced "twah" - without the t on the end. Turns out she thought people were trying to use the French word toit. No idea why she thought people were going around calling each other roofs.

[–] Akasazh@feddit.nl 2 points 1 year ago
[–] quicken@aussie.zone 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Xeet - one better than yeet.

[–] appel@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 year ago

That man's got no god damn sense.

[–] qwertyqwertyqwerty@lemmy.one 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Getting rid of the last remaining identifiable part of the company. Genius move.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Daydreamer@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It is entirely possible that he just wrecks companies for fun.

[–] CalamityJoe@aussie.zone 4 points 1 year ago

Or on purpose, in this case.

Rebranding at this level sounds very much like purposeful destruction of an existing resource and company, rather than an attempt to make the company any better, successful, or more profitable.

I'm starting to wonder if the Saudis have told him they'll reimburse any of his personal losses from his stock buy, in return for sinking and destroying the company.

It just seems like the Musk buy, once it happened, has been too effective a means of destroying a platform that was previously used extensively by protestors and activists to organise mass group activity against governments and authorities.

It would certainly be my answer now to those regular Reddit questions like "what's the one conspiracy theory you actually believe is true?"

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago

Pay $44 billion for a well known and popular company, ditch the name and the logo for something totally new and unknown.

So smart.

[–] Auzy@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Great, so they're going to replace it with a logo with no personality and which is less marketable.

[–] arefx@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DarthYoshiBoy@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

I choose to believe he's just doing this for memes at this point. I can't accept humans are capable of these depths through inadvertent action, it's just too dumb.

[–] Carighan@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Wrong community tbh, this is solid nottheonion material. I don't understand this world any more to be honest. 😅

[–] JIMMERZ@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

It’s almost like he’s intentionally trying to tank this company. What would be the benefit for him? A massive tax write-off?

load more comments
view more: next ›