this post was submitted on 08 Aug 2024
311 points (95.3% liked)

Technology

59300 readers
5064 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] db2@lemmy.world 113 points 3 months ago (3 children)

The frivolous lawsuit worked then.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 42 points 3 months ago (1 children)

More economically to shut down and reincorporate than to spend a bunch of money on lawyers.

But I doubt Musk is going to see a flood of new ad revenue out of this.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 34 points 3 months ago

new ad revenue

I'm no marketing guy, and all other things aside, signing an advertising agreement with X would be a hard "NO" after this suit.

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 20 points 3 months ago

Maybe it's a Win win. Less advertisers and Elon looks like a psychopath and disuades further ad income for his hate platform

[–] Zak@lemmy.world 103 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Musk: starts allowing Nazi shit on Xitter

Advertiisers: Hey, we don't like Nazi shit. We might stop advertising if that keeps happening.

Musk: Go fuck yourself. Is that clear? I hope it is.

Advertisers: stop doing business with the guy who told them to go fuck themselves

[–] felixwhynot@lemmy.world 15 points 3 months ago
[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 12 points 3 months ago

Elon then sues them for listening to his advice

[–] TheDarksteel94@sopuli.xyz 4 points 3 months ago

Who could've ever seen this coming? lol

[–] themurphy@lemmy.ml 70 points 3 months ago

He literally bullied a non-profit organisation set in the world to use advertisement money responsible into ceasing operations.

Loss for the world once again, and the article even says that Republicans celebrated. That country is sick.

[–] norimee@lemmy.world 66 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

THIS IS NOT A GOOD THING.
He didn't shut down advertisers, he shut down an organisation for best practices in advertising.

Wiki World Federation of Advertisers

WFA's aim is to champion effective and sustainable marketing communications worldwide. ..

...WFA formed the Global Alliance for Responsible Media (GARM), a global cross-industry alliance which aims to improve digital safety and eliminate harmful online content....The alliance has introduced guidelines concerning misinformation and new standards on ad placements...

...WFA is a founding member of the Unstereotype Alliance, UN Women's flagship partnership with the marketing industry to eradicate harmful gender stereotypes in advertising...It is also a founding member of the Coalition for Better Ads, a cross-industry initiative to improve consumers’ experience with online advertising.

WFA holds Global Marketer Week, a series of events bringing together brand marketers to learn about the latest public affairs issues and best practice in marketing.

[–] schema@lemmy.world 66 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Even if this group shuts down completely, all this does is waste twitter's money while it also tells advertisers to stay the fuck away from ever do any business on Twitter.

[–] SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world 25 points 3 months ago

And now he has to sue the advertisers individually if he wants to continue this idiotic plan. That'll surely convince people to spend money on X

[–] vanontom@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago

I read this similarly. Most significantly, advertisers in the group are probably less likely to spend on tweeter now. The complete opposite of Elen's goal. The advertisers simply "deleted" the group (not any actual ad agencies), because it was calculated to cost the least. The group, GARM, was an attempt to collectively manage harm to their brands, which they will obviously continue to do in other ways.

[–] Red_October@lemmy.world 47 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Sounds to me like all advertisers should just assume that on Xitter, their ads will show alongside Nazi/Alt-Right/Hateful content. GARM, the project that Elmo just killed, used to inform them when that sort of thing happened. So with the warning system down, Ad companies should revert to a fail-safe state and abandon the platform completely.

And the rest of us should ABSOLUTELY make a habit of blasting out screenshots of ads next to heinous shit, and ask the company why they support that kind of content.

[–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 16 points 3 months ago

And the rest of us should ABSOLUTELY make a habit of blasting out screenshots of ads next to heinous shit, and ask the company why they support that kind of content.

This is the way

[–] axh@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

And the rest of us should ABSOLUTELY make a habit of blasting out screenshots

Good idea, but stopping using xitter completely would be even better.

[–] DrunkenPirate@feddit.org 44 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Note to myself: Whenever I do contracts or somehow being responsible, I‘ll put a proxy company in between. If things go bad, I just shut down that responsible proxy and am out of duty.

Just an interesting observation about business behavior.

How it would work in real life?

Like how can you advertise on Xitter via a proxy?

[–] EatMyPixelDust@lemmy.blahaj.zone 39 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I feel like this will only hurt him in the long term, advertisers in general are probably more likely to avoid X in the future. I know I would.

[–] BleatingZombie@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

"Hey, come over here. And when you do, I won't let you leave"

[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 38 points 3 months ago (2 children)

jk rowling, elon musk.. what is it with billionaires suing people to silence criticism

[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 27 points 3 months ago (1 children)

They are all the biggest snowflakes. The slightest criticism breaks their fragile egos. Billionaires really require a safe space.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 months ago

TBH the whole planet is a safe space for billionaires, not so much for everybody else.

[–] Gsus4@mander.xyz 4 points 3 months ago

It's cheap to them and bankrupts their victims or forces them to settle. There should be a way to punish frivolous lawsuits by %income/assets.

[–] harrys_balzac@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 3 months ago

Do what other businesses do - just reincorporate under a different name

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 22 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] Thebular@lemmy.world 25 points 3 months ago

It definitely is, but they filed in Texas which doesn't have anti-SLAPP laws for federal cases

[–] YeetPics@mander.xyz 17 points 3 months ago

I wish Elon treated the whole planet like his children.

He would just jet off and never communicate again, we would be free of this cancer for good.

[–] Simulation6@sopuli.xyz 15 points 3 months ago

They are getting all this great free press about why to avoid Musk, must have figured their job is done.

[–] afivedaystorm@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago

Why can’t he shut down already?

[–] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I heard the new club is going to be called thenoelons and Elon Lindenstrauss is going to be a member.

[–] __Lost__@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 3 months ago

It says "no ElonS" We're allowed to have one

[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago
[–] AlteredEgo@lemmy.ml -1 points 3 months ago (2 children)

On the one hand I hate Elon Musk. On the other hand I also hate advertisement.

So.... win / win?

[–] YeetPics@mander.xyz 18 points 3 months ago

Idk, advertisers didn't get shut down, a group promoting best practices in advertising got shut down.

You're about to dislike ads even more.

[–] gearheart@lemm.ee 7 points 3 months ago

Lose/lose situation here unfortunately.

Basically he threw a fit. It worked.

It affected something that it should not have.

load more comments
view more: next ›