TL;DR people don’t update their shit
this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2024
37 points (95.1% liked)
Cybersecurity
5689 readers
165 users here now
c/cybersecurity is a community centered on the cybersecurity and information security profession. You can come here to discuss news, post something interesting, or just chat with others.
THE RULES
Instance Rules
- Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here.
- No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
- No Ads / Spamming.
- No pornography.
Community Rules
- Idk, keep it semi-professional?
- Nothing illegal. We're all ethical here.
- Rules will be added/redefined as necessary.
If you ask someone to hack your "friends" socials you're just going to get banned so don't do that.
Learn about hacking
Other security-related communities !databreaches@lemmy.zip !netsec@lemmy.world !cybersecurity@lemmy.capebreton.social !securitynews@infosec.pub !netsec@links.hackliberty.org !cybersecurity@infosec.pub !pulse_of_truth@infosec.pub
Notable mention to !cybersecuritymemes@lemmy.world
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
surprised Pikachu face
Also: vendors don't update their shit.
If you have a internet attached device and it isn't getting systematic and timely updates, you have a time bomb. Doesn't matter who made the device initially
Ubiquity has patched the issue identified in the article, people have these devices deployed and they are not patching them....
This is why I avoid opening up "service" devices to the broader internet.
My current work around is to access a computer with TeamViewer on a given local network and manage things from there. There are probably flaws with this approach too, but it seems like a more manageable solution than giving IoT-type devices access to the open internet.
I do wonder if protocol like Yggdrasil would be a good solution in the future.
That’s why I have firewalls 🤷🏻♂️