So basically Planet X: 2024 is what youβre saying π§
this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2023
4 points (100.0% liked)
Space
8724 readers
4 users here now
Share & discuss informative content on: Astrophysics, Cosmology, Space Exploration, Planetary Science and Astrobiology.
Rules
- Be respectful and inclusive.
- No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
- Engage in constructive discussions.
- Share relevant content.
- Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
- Use appropriate language and tone.
- Report violations.
- Foster a continuous learning environment.
Picture of the Day
The Busy Center of the Lagoon Nebula
Related Communities
π Science
- !astronomy@mander.xyz
- !curiosityrover@lemmy.world
- !earthscience@mander.xyz
- !esa@feddit.nl
- !nasa@lemmy.world
- !perseverancerover@lemmy.world
- !physics@mander.xyz
- !space@beehaw.org
- !space@lemmy.world
π Engineering
π Art and Photography
Other Cool Links
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Does anyone have an idea if this is anywhere near the mass needed to account for "dark matter"? It sounds like something that (if true) would at least change the math a bit... ?
Does anyone have an idea if this is anywhere near the mass needed to account for "dark matter"?
It's not, unfortunately. In the context of dark matter, objects like this are referred to as "MACHOs" (or Massive Compact Halo Objects). These have been considered as a possible solution to the dark matter problem for decades, but sky surveys have failed to find them in sufficient numbers to account for even a fraction of the missing mass.
Another important consideration is where these object are in the galaxy. We know that dark matter mostly exists in an extended shell (usually referred to as a halo β hence the H in MACHO) that surrounds the galaxy, rather than being embedded inside it. Rogue planets are expected to be intermixed with the rest of the "light matter" in the galaxy, rather than distributed in this extended halo region.