this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2024
61 points (85.9% liked)

politics

19126 readers
2371 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SuperCub@sh.itjust.works 31 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Tim Walz is an excellent choice for the working class. I'm excited and will be all in for a Harris-Walz ticket.

Tim Walz's accomplishments as Governor:

  • Universal free school lunches
  • Paid sick and medical leave
  • Banned non-compete agreements
  • Expanded protections for workers at Amazon warehouses
  • Increased wages for Uber and Lyft workers
  • Legalization of cannabis
  • Achieved substantial police reform including bans on chokeholds, peace officers and deescalation training, and an independent Bureau of Criminal Apprehension
  • 100% clean energy by 2040
[–] Dkarma@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It will be Shapiro or Kelly. I'm leaning Shapiro cuz they want to lock up PA, but I really like Kelly.

[–] return2ozma@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

I'm thinking it'll be Shapiro also because of Pennsylvania.

[–] Sidewalker@lemm.ee 14 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Please don’t take my Mark Kelly dream from me 😢

[–] return2ozma@lemmy.world 20 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] Wiz@midwest.social 2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I'm trying to wrap my head around:

Doesn't Alienate any part of the coalition

What does that even mean?

[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

Appeals to the left side of the party without pissing off the centrists.

[–] Makhno@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

Nothing. It means absolutely nothing

[–] friend_of_satan@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

Old white man may pacify older generation of voters.

[–] JaymesRS 25 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

Be careful of writing him off as just an “old white man”. He’s done pretty great with a tiny majority in MN and he’s been a great communicator.

[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 25 points 3 months ago (1 children)

school teacher for 20 years, 24 serving in the guard. stellar public service record. definitely ticks all the boxes.

[–] friend_of_satan@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago

Sounds great! He pacifies the folks who just want an old white man, and also brings a lot of important characteristics to the table. Good by me!

[–] SuperCub@sh.itjust.works 18 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Tim Walz's accomplishments as Governor:

  • Universal free school lunches
  • Paid sick and medical leave
  • Banned non-compete agreements
  • Expanded protections for workers at Amazon warehouses
  • Increased wages for Uber and Lyft workers
  • Legalization of cannabis
  • Achieved substantial police reform including bans on chokeholds, peace officers and deescalation training, and an independent Bureau of Criminal Apprehension
  • 100% clean energy by 2040
[–] eldavi@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 months ago

sounds like another tim kaine moment.

[–] EchoCT@lemmy.ml 7 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Sounds like a great guy who would do well, but is needed in his state more than as VP.

[–] MrMcGasion@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

Katie Porter isn't doing anything now that she lost her Senate bid to Schiff, and has made some fans even in conservative circles for her whiteboard explanations and takedowns of pharma CEOs and pentagon overspending.

I know a bunch of people say Kamala needs a white man for VP, but I'm not sure that tracks logically, sexists aren't going to suddenly be okay with a woman just because she has a man as VP.

[–] FanciestPants@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I go back and forth on Raphael Warnock for the same reason. He's definitely needed in Georgia, but wouldn't it be great for a presidential candidate to be able to say the last person they talk to before any major decision as president will be a pastor?

[–] JaymesRS 2 points 3 months ago

Honestly, we’ll manage just fine with Peggy Flanagan. She’s pretty great too.

[–] medgremlin@midwest.social 2 points 3 months ago

I came here to say, as a Minnesotan: "NO. HE'S OURS. HECK OFF, WE'RE KEEPING HIM!"

[–] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 4 points 3 months ago

I believe that people are ready to leave Red State/Blue State behind.

[–] Phenomephrene@thebrainbin.org 3 points 3 months ago

I'd be ecstatic if Walz ends up being chosen. He's not without a couple of cons that I could think of right of the top of my head, but if I'm going purely on the basis of what I'd like to see in a VP, he's at the very top of the list of those who I've seen get mentioned as in the running.

[–] blazera@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Yeah he seems alright

[–] archomrade@midwest.social 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Waltz is a dream VP pick

He might be the only pick that would make me enthusiastically vote instead of begrudgingly